On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi devs,
Roadmap time again for 4.1. Here's a proposal below. If you're a
committer/contributor and wish to propose doing something for 4.1 please
reply to this thread to have a complete roadmap.
For committers who
On Jun 1, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi devs,
This proposal is a restart of the thread I've sent, entitled [Proposal]
XWiki's Permanent Directory Strategy for Installations in which I wasn't
clear.
On Jun 2, 2012, at 4:06 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi devs,
This proposal is a restart of the thread I've sent, entitled [Proposal]
XWiki's Permanent Directory Strategy for Installations in which I wasn't
clear.
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose that we:
1) always add explanations in our pom.xml files when we add CLIRR excludes
(since we should have any based on our deprecation/legacy rule)
2) copy them in our release notes.
As an example I've just done that for
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose that we:
1) always add explanations in our pom.xml files when we add CLIRR excludes
(since we should have any based on our deprecation/legacy rule)
2) copy them in our release notes.
As
Hi devs,
The feature-diff-display branch provides a new diff module,
xwiki-commons-diff-display, with APIs to help displaying diffs.
Currently it supports two diff formats: unified (GitHub style, suited
for code) and inline (suited for free text). I'm using this module for
the merge conflict
Here's the link, in case you haven't found the branch already
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/compare/feature-diff-display
Thanks,
Marius
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi devs,
The feature-diff-display branch provides a
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
On Jun 2, 2012, at 4:06 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi devs,
This proposal is a restart of the thread I've sent, entitled [Proposal]
XWiki's
+1
In case it's not clear for some of you, it' s a display oriented API
on top of the new base diff API and not a different diff module ;)
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi devs,
The feature-diff-display branch provides a new diff
+1
Best Regards,
/Andreas
On 2012-06-04 10:24, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose that we:
1) always add explanations in our pom.xml files when we add CLIRR excludes
(since we should have any based on our deprecation/legacy rule)
2) copy them in our release notes.
As an
+1
Best Regards,
/Andreas
On 2012-06-01 15:30, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
This proposal is a restart of the thread I've sent, entitled [Proposal] XWiki's
Permanent Directory Strategy for Installations in which I wasn't clear.
Executive Summary
Define 2 XWiki
+1
Best Regards,
/Andreas
On 2012-06-04 10:38, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Hi devs,
The feature-diff-display branch provides a new diff module,
xwiki-commons-diff-display, with APIs to help displaying diffs.
Currently it supports two diff formats: unified (GitHub style, suited
for code) and
+1 btw
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Thomas Mortagne
thomas.morta...@xwiki.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
On Jun 2, 2012, at 4:06 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi devs,
This proposal is a restart of the thread I've sent, entitled [Proposal]
XWiki's Permanent Directory Strategy for Installations in which I wasn't
clear.
Executive Summary
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose that we:
1) always add explanations in our pom.xml files when we add CLIRR excludes
(since we should have any based on our deprecation/legacy rule)
2) copy them in our
Hi devs,
Just some heads up to let you know I'm planning to reorganize the Jetty tool
modules today as follows:
xwiki-patform-tool-jetty/
|_ xwiki-patform-tool-jetty-listener/ -- JAR
|_ xwiki-patform-tool-jetty-configuration/ -- JAR using Remote Resource
Bundle plugin
|_
On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
Just some heads up to let you know I'm planning to reorganize the Jetty tool
modules today as follows:
xwiki-patform-tool-jetty/
|_ xwiki-patform-tool-jetty-listener/ -- JAR
|_ xwiki-patform-tool-jetty-configuration/ -- JAR
You can't use server side components directly in a WYSIWYG editor
plugin which is client side code. You need to write a service and call
that service asynchronously from the client. The service can be
implemented as GWT-RPC, REST, wiki page, etc.
I don't understand the second problem.
Hope this
The source is by default wiki syntax and thus the HTML is converted to
wiki syntax when you save, but since there is no direct equivalent for
INPUT HTML element in wiki syntax (nor for any other form elements)
this information is lost during save. You need to use the HTML macro
but for this you
On Jun 4, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
Just some heads up to let you know I'm planning to reorganize the Jetty tool
modules today as follows:
xwiki-patform-tool-jetty/
|_ xwiki-patform-tool-jetty-listener/ --
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET
jeremie.bousq...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I really like the idea, and agree with you that it would
simplify upgrade process.
If I may, I would propose XWIKI_HOME as environment variable name, and
use it both to store permanent data and
Hi Sergiu,
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com wrote:
On 05/11/2012 10:22 AM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Vincent Massolvinc...@massol.net
wrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 2:28 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 04/25/2012 03:10 PM,
On Jun 4, 2012, at 2:04 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jun 4, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
Just some heads up to let you know I'm planning to reorganize the Jetty
tool modules today as follows:
Hi
It's try that a Wysiwyg Diff would be great. Now there are a few
issues when scripting is involved.
But now with syntax 2 we can detect the usage of velocity. So it would
make a lot of sense to:
1/ Detect usage of scripting in a field
- no usage: use HTML/Wysiwyg diff
- usage: use text
Hi,
I'm going to be starting the stable-4.1.x please tell me if you need to commit
against this branch
I would like to know what's going to be committed into this branch so we can
hopefully avoid the:
late commits - destabilize the build - delaying the release - allowing more
late commits
Hi Caleb,
On Jun 4, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to be starting the stable-4.1.x please tell me if you need to
commit against this branch
I would like to know what's going to be committed into this branch so we can
hopefully avoid the:
late commits -
On 06/04/2012 09:45 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Caleb,
On Jun 4, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to be starting the stable-4.1.x please tell me if you need to
commit against this branch
I would like to know what's going to be committed into this branch so
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Vincent Massolvinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Hi devs,
Roadmap time again for 4.1. Here's a proposal below. If you're a
committer/contributor and wish to propose doing something for 4.1 please
reply to this thread to have a complete roadmap.
For
Thank you again for your answers and insights!
Is there anything someone else would like to add to this? If you do,
please feel free to add anything that comes to mind, I can always use
more data! And if not (I know I have been bothering you for a while
now ;) ) I would like to take this
On Jun 4, 2012, at 4:57 PM, Martin Schönberger wrote:
Thank you again for your answers and insights!
Is there anything someone else would like to add to this? If you do,
please feel free to add anything that comes to mind, I can always use
more data! And if not (I know I have been
Hi,
On 2012-06-04 16:17, Marczisovszky Daniel wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Vincent Massolvinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Hi devs,
Roadmap time again for 4.1. Here's a proposal below. If you're a
committer/contributor and wish to propose doing something for 4.1
please reply to
Hi,
Do we now exactly in which version this bug showed up ?
Ludovic
2012/6/4 Andreas Jonsson a...@member.fsf.org:
Hi,
On 2012-06-04 16:17, Marczisovszky Daniel wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Vincent Massolvinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Hi devs,
Roadmap time again for
32 matches
Mail list logo
