[xwiki-devs] [XWiki Day] BFD#191

Hello devs, This Thursday is BFD#191: http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/XWikiDays#HBugfixingday Our current status is: * -54 bugs over 120 days (4 months), i.e. we need to close 54 bugs to have created bugs == closed bugs * -98 bugs over 365 days (1 year) * -154 bugs over 500 days (be

Re: [xwiki-devs] Proposal for Macro inline edition

Hi everyone, I've started implementing this on the WYSIWYG editor side and there are two constraints that we need to be aware: (1) Macro#supportsInlineMode() must be false The CKEditor handles macros as widgets and widgets

Re: [xwiki-devs] [WCAG] Reference validator

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:28 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote: > > Hi devs, > > I've started to analyze the 971 tests failing on webstandards related to > the WCAG validation. > I plan to create issues in order for us to fix the errors. The problem I > have is that we were validating against the

[xwiki-devs] [WCAG] Reference validator

Hi devs, I've started to analyze the 971 tests failing on webstandards related to the WCAG validation. I plan to create issues in order for us to fix the errors. The problem I have is that we were validating against the Dutch Guidelines validation tool (previously http://www.webrichtlijnen.nl/engl

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Improve our Test Coverage strategy (TAKE 2)

> On 3 Oct 2018, at 12:55, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote: > > +0 with the mention that the process needs to be documented well on the > Release Plan. Yes it would be the first step or one of the first steps. And to be done not on the release day (that’s too late) but during the month (same

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Improve our Test Coverage strategy (TAKE 2)

+0 with the mention that the process needs to be documented well on the Release Plan. As a RM I will need to know where and at what job / report to look at. Also our ci is very slow and the release process IMO gets harder and harder because of the long waiting times, sometimes waiting for 5 hours t

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Improve our Test Coverage strategy (TAKE 2)

Sounds good. +1 Thanks, Marius On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 11:56 AM Vincent Massol wrote: > Hi devs, > > We started discussing a first global test coverage strategy in > https://markmail.org/message/grphwta63pp5p4l7 > > I’d like to propose some updates and tuning now that we have a Clover > Jenkins

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Improve our Test Coverage strategy (TAKE 2)

Hi, I think it's a good idea and +1 to run the job during the night. I hope it won't be too long/difficult to take care of this during an XS release though :). Thanks, Adel On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 10:56 AM Vincent Massol wrote: > > Hi devs, > > We started discussing a first global test coverage

[xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Improve our Test Coverage strategy (TAKE 2)

Hi devs, We started discussing a first global test coverage strategy in https://markmail.org/message/grphwta63pp5p4l7 I’d like to propose some updates and tuning now that we have a Clover Jenkins pipeline working (brainstormed with Simon): Here’s the new proposal: * We run the Clover Jenkins p