Re: [xwiki-devs] Fwd: [xwiki/xwiki-commons] One of your dependencies may have a security vulnerability

FTR this is one feature of the FASTEN research project that XWiki SAS is going to participate to. Thanks -Vincent > On 16 Oct 2018, at 19:24, Vincent Massol wrote: > > nice… > > Even though we rolled back this upgrade since it has regressions ;) > > -Vincent > >> Begin forwarded message:

[xwiki-devs] Fwd: [xwiki/xwiki-commons] One of your dependencies may have a security vulnerability

nice… Even though we rolled back this upgrade since it has regressions ;) -Vincent > Begin forwarded message: > > From: GitHub > Subject: [xwiki/xwiki-commons] One of your dependencies may have a security > vulnerability > Date: 16 October 2018 at 19:02:58 CEST > To: xwiki/xwiki-commons >

[xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Change ObservationManager behaviour with CancelableEvents

Hi everyone, the current behaviour of the ObservationManager is to always triggers the listeners if it matches the events. Now regarding the CancelableEvents, the match is only done on the type of the event and some given filter rules, but never with its cancel status: if an event is

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Prevent users from renaming/move pages with XClass definition

Hello everyone, I'm coming back on this proposal as the work is going on, to basically propose to dropping the warning on copy action. I try to sum up why in the following. When implementing the proposal, I was adviced to use an event listener, observing the deleting event for informing the

Re: [xwiki-devs] [STAMP/Test] Metrics we need to improve + strategy

Hi there, We need some more DSpot results. Would be great if you could help out. See below for instructions. > On 29 Aug 2018, at 11:20, Vincent Massol wrote: > > Hi devs (and anyone else interested to improve the tests of XWiki), > > History > == > > It all started when I analyzed our