I've added the ReleaseNotes.Code.ReleaseNoteClass xobject to the 7.x - 10.x summary pages.
Thanks, Caty On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:13 AM Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: > Hi Caty, > > If you think it’s important to see all RN for a cycle, we could implement > what I mentioned, ie a second LT showing only cycles (and thus introduce a > new xobject). Let me know what you think and whether it’s overkill or not? > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > Le 18 déc. 2018 à 13:51, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> a écrit : > > > > Hi Caty, > > > >> On 18 Dec 2018, at 11:39, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <vali...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I don't want to drop it, since it helped me have a grouped release notes > >> per cycle. > > > > I really don’t see the need, could you explain? > > > >> Especially since it contains release from when the Release Notes app > didn't > >> existed (< 8.2). Also you cannot make the livetable "Version" filter > say: > >> "start with 8.", since you will also have results like "10.8" if you are > >> filtering for "8.x". So these pages list only the valid releases and in > the > >> correct order. > > > > Honestly this is overkill and I’m pretty sure that it’s ok for > users.They can type “8.” for ex and even if that would match “6.4.8”, it’s > very much usable IMO. > > > > Regarding RN for versions < 8.2, there’s already a RN Archives page here: > > https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/Archives > > > > So what you have put for 7.x, 8.x and 9.x is already a duplicate of what > we have at https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/Archives ;) > > > > My only point is that we shouldn’t reinvent the wheel. If you want to > improve the RN app then cool but please let’s not redo it! :) > > > > Thanks > > -Vincent > > > >> > >>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:21 PM Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Caty, > >>> > >>>>> On 17 Dec 2018, at 13:03, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) < > vali...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Sounds ok. > >>>> > >>>> I just want to let you know that regarding cycles, there are 2 pages: > >>>> * 1 archive page that has like a toc of links to all the releases in > the > >>>> cycle + link to summary, example: > >>>> > https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki7x/ > >>> > >>> Yes I’ve seen this page but I don’t feel it’s very interesting. I think > >>> it’s duplicating the existing LT and doesn’t add a lot of value. I’d > be in > >>> favor of dropping it. WDYT? > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> -Vincent > >>> > >>>> * 1 that contains the summary, example: > >>> > https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki7x/Summary > >>>> > >>>> If we were not to add this xobject, alternatively we could manually > list > >>>> the cycle archive page, but I guess the xobject is a more scalable > >>>> solution. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Caty > >>>> > >>>>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 1:30 PM Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi devs, > >>>>> > >>>>> This is especially for Caty who created: > >>>>> * > >>> > https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki7x/Summary > >>>>> * > >>> > https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki8x/Summary > >>>>> * > >>> > https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki9x/Summary > >>>>> * > >>> > https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki10x/Summary > >>>>> > >>>>> Right now these summaries don’t appear on > >>>>> https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ > >>>>> > >>>>> I’m proposing to simply add a ReleaseNotes.Code.ReleaseNoteClass > xobject > >>>>> to them so that they can appear in the RN LT, and to use the > following > >>>>> xproperty values: > >>>>> > >>>>> * Product: XWiki > >>>>> * Version: 7.x, 8.x, 9.x, 10.x > >>>>> * Is released: true > >>>>> * Release Date: 31/12/<year> > >>>>> > >>>>> The alternative is more complex and involves creating a new XClass > for > >>>>> Cycle Summaries and modifying the home page to list cycle summaries > in > >>> a LT > >>>>> (so that it can scale). Of course we could also do a lightweight > >>> version by > >>>>> simply having a link on the home page to a cycle summary page listing > >>> links > >>>>> to individual summaries. It would be less visible but could be > >>> acceptable. > >>>>> However, the best and easiest is for me to add the > >>>>> ReleaseNotes.Code.ReleaseNoteClass xobjects to Cycle RN pages. > >>>>> > >>>>> WDYT? > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks > >>>>> -Vincent > > >
