Hi Malaka,
Don't you need a xwiki syntax parser for this?
As you probably know I have written such a parser in the new rendering
module. Just make you don't reinvent one.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Jun 12, 2008, at 6:05 AM, malaka ekanayake wrote:
Hi fabio
Regarding the xwiki syntax I have some
Hi Venkatesh,
On Jun 12, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Venkatesh Nandakumar wrote:
[snip]
1. Syntax Highlighting, to a large extent, though there have been
problems, as pointed out by Malaka, *bold~~combined~~bold* doesn't
give
the required effect, and secondly, the complex use of '*' in the wiki
On 12 juin 08, at 10:48, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Venkatesh,
On Jun 12, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Venkatesh Nandakumar wrote:
[snip]
1. Syntax Highlighting, to a large extent, though there have been
problems, as pointed out by Malaka, *bold~~combined~~bold* doesn't
give
the required effect,
On Jun 12, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Fabio Mancinelli wrote:
On 12 juin 08, at 10:48, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Venkatesh,
On Jun 12, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Venkatesh Nandakumar wrote:
[snip]
1. Syntax Highlighting, to a large extent, though there have been
problems, as pointed out by Malaka,
Hi fabio
Regarding the xwiki syntax I have some questions. Up to now its
straightforward to implement the highlighting for syntaxes like
*bold*.
*bold* can be easily identified by a MultiLineRule as a single partition.
But it is possible for someone to write a *bold~~bold italics~~bold*.Right ?.
5 matches
Mail list logo
