Re: [xwiki-devs] XEclipse Off-Line

2007-10-11 Thread Fabio Mancinelli
On Oct 11, 2007, at 9:32 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote: Short message to say I've tried the standalone version (thx Asiri, Tharindu Fabio :-) and it works simply great! Just a few words about the standalone version. This is a version that I packaged by using a minimal set of plugins. Since

[xwiki-devs] XEclipse Navigation improvements ideas (was Re: XEclipse Off-Line)

2007-10-11 Thread Vincent Massol
It does rock! I've started trying to use it for real yesterday for managing xwiki.org and I found some usability issues on navigation (I have created jira issues for those), so these are things we should work on in the future to make it even greater. This is the process I use on xwiki.org

Re: [xwiki-devs] XEclipse Off-Line

2007-10-11 Thread Vincent Massol
Thanks Asiri, Will try this as soon as I succeed in building XEclipse again (not sure why but I cannot built it right now). Have some nice deserved holidays! Thanks -Vincent On Oct 10, 2007, at 11:41 PM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote: Hi Vincent and All, On 10/7/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Package plugin] Export documents with withVersions=false

2007-10-11 Thread Jerome Velociter
Hi Thomas, I agree, all those parameters should be reset if you specify you don't want history. In a way, you want a new document as if it never existed before, so dates shoulds be the import date, and so on. This is somehow the same as the copyDocument issue here :

[xwiki-devs] Reintroduce the Resolved state in JIRA

2007-10-11 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu
Hi, We should reintroduce the Resolved state in the issue workflow, and it should work like this: - When closing an issue, it will go in the Resolved state, which means that somebody provided a fix and it is committed in the repository. - Somebody else can test (manually) that the issue is