> On 9 Apr 2018, at 15:34, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>>> On 6 Apr 2018, at 11:57, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>>>
>>> Not sure what to think of those examples.
>>>
>>> The theory sounds nice and it probably produce nice res
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>> On 6 Apr 2018, at 11:57, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>>
>> Not sure what to think of those examples.
>>
>> The theory sounds nice and it probably produce nice result when
>> talking about one method with a few inputs and an output
Hi Thomas,
> On 6 Apr 2018, at 11:57, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>
> Not sure what to think of those examples.
>
> The theory sounds nice and it probably produce nice result when
> talking about one method with a few inputs and an output but for
> anything more complex (like anything involving comp
Not sure what to think of those examples.
The theory sounds nice and it probably produce nice result when
talking about one method with a few inputs and an output but for
anything more complex (like anything involving components) I feel you
end up with a generated test which is a lot harder to rea
4 matches
Mail list logo