Re: [xwiki-devs] [Brainstorming] EvoCrash usage on XWiki?

2018-04-09 Thread Vincent Massol
> On 9 Apr 2018, at 15:34, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >>> On 6 Apr 2018, at 11:57, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >>> >>> Not sure what to think of those examples. >>> >>> The theory sounds nice and it probably produce nice res

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Brainstorming] EvoCrash usage on XWiki?

2018-04-09 Thread Thomas Mortagne
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: > Hi Thomas, > >> On 6 Apr 2018, at 11:57, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >> >> Not sure what to think of those examples. >> >> The theory sounds nice and it probably produce nice result when >> talking about one method with a few inputs and an output

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Brainstorming] EvoCrash usage on XWiki?

2018-04-09 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi Thomas, > On 6 Apr 2018, at 11:57, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > > Not sure what to think of those examples. > > The theory sounds nice and it probably produce nice result when > talking about one method with a few inputs and an output but for > anything more complex (like anything involving comp

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Brainstorming] EvoCrash usage on XWiki?

2018-04-06 Thread Thomas Mortagne
Not sure what to think of those examples. The theory sounds nice and it probably produce nice result when talking about one method with a few inputs and an output but for anything more complex (like anything involving components) I feel you end up with a generated test which is a lot harder to rea