On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:36:45PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Here is an idea for improvement. Please check my idea is right or not.
> I am not familiar with this bootstrapping tricks. (What does
> means? If nocheck is defined, skip it for dependency?
Yes.
> Recent commits by Mattia Rizzolo
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 05:24:43PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Anyway, I took the liberty and implemented the following mostly-untested
> patch to uscan which uses your idea and executes debian/mk-origtargz (if
> it exists and is executable) instead of the system's mk-origtargz.
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 08:51:49PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Note that this Policy language is carefully written to make it perfectly
> > fine for uscan to support all the things it currently supports, since it
> > only talks
Hi,
Here is an idea for improvement. Please check my idea is right or not.
I am not familiar with this bootstrapping tricks. (What does
means? If nocheck is defined, skip it for dependency? Following script
may need to flip logic ifeq/ifneq)
Recent commits by Mattia Rizzolo made me wonder
Hi all,
Updated patch attached:
* Combines the "License" paragraphs. (Thanks James!)
* Drops the auto-generated "DO NOT MODIFY THIS FILE!" warning. (Thanks Paul!)
commit 07ee158e84dc41c567e6727adc488d01f8a70989
Author: Chris Lamb
Date: Mon Aug 28 08:43:58 2017