On 3 October 2011 12:28, Bob Jolliffe bobjolli...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings
Back in the land of the little people and the bogs. I've just
returned from a week in Rwanda (which was much too short) where I had
the opportunity to work with Arthur Heywood and some good people in
the Rwanda MOH
Hi,
I think your data element/category definitions make sense in this
case. One should clearly not join the four category options you
mention into the same category here.
In Kenya we discovered that 90 % of the forms fit with the classic
data-elements-on-the-rows-and-categories-on-the-columns
2011/10/3 Lars Helge Øverland larshe...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I think your data element/category definitions make sense in this
case. One should clearly not join the four category options you
mention into the same category here.
In Kenya we discovered that 90 % of the forms fit with the classic
Yes the remembering is a pain. With a concept/category hierarchy
this will become easier, but for short term workaround it won't be too
bad and will be easier to convert existing data to updated design
later. Mind you, the pivot tables should be much better, not worse,
in terms of blank
4 matches
Mail list logo
