Sure that sounds great. Please feel free to sent the patch to Morten.
Regards,
Jason
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:53 PM, David Siang Fong Oh
wrote:
> Hi Jason, Morten,
>
> We took a look at the code for the fix:
>var startDate = this.calendar.newDate(year, 1, 1);
>
Hi Jason, Morten,
We took a look at the code for the fix:
var startDate = this.calendar.newDate(year, 1, 1);
// startDate.add(-(startDate.dayOfWeek() - 1), 'd'); // rewind to start
of week, might cross year boundary
var day = startDate.dayOfWeek();
if( day == 0 ) // Sunday (0),
Hi Marta and Papa,
We identified the bug (we think) and Morten has updated the code with a
fix, and backported it back to version 2.17. New builds are available here
http://ci.dhis2.org/ .
I have tested this on one instance, and it seems to work OK now. Let us
know if it works for you.
Best
Hi Jason,
we just started receiving emails from users reporting the same problem.
Will follow the evolution.
Cheers
On 4 January 2016 at 18:05, papa alioune Sokhna
wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> If that information can be useful I noticed that the dhis our Ministry of
> Health
Hi Papa,
Could you be more specific?
December 28th - Jan 3rd should be 2015W53. Usually years have 52 weeks, but
this happens from time to time, due to how ISO weeks are defined.
Are you seeing this in the analysis modules for last 52 weeks?
Regards,
Jason
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:18 PM, papa
Hello team
how to define the numbers of weeks on dhis2 because the marking is not
correct it there's a repitition of the week of December 28, 2015 to January
4, 2016.
Best regards.
--
Papa Alioune SOKHNA
*Informaticien *
Spécialité: développement d'application web, mobile et logiciels surs
Tel:
Hi Jason,
If that information can be useful I noticed that the dhis our Ministry of
Health does not have this problem and they have version 2.15.
2016-01-04 16:16 GMT+00:00 Jason Pickering :
> Hi Papa,
>
> I am able to reproduce this. It is clearly a bug.
>
> I think
the problem is that the date of December 28 2015 to January 3 2016 is
considered both 2015W53 and 2016W1 in dhis2.
2016-01-04 15:55 GMT+00:00 papa alioune Sokhna :
> I noticed in the function given before he repeated in the W53 2015 with W1
> 2016. When you try to enter
Hi Papa,
I am able to reproduce this. It is clearly a bug.
I think you should used 2015W53 for this period, but there could be a major
problem if the weeks for 2016 are off.
Jan/Lars, could you comment?
Regards,
Jason
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:55 PM, papa alioune Sokhna
9 matches
Mail list logo