On 16 July 2012 17:38, Saptarshi Purkayastha wrote:
>
>
> On 16 July 2012 15:21, Bob Jolliffe wrote:
>>
>>
>> If you just want the specification for a single datavalueset template
>> then you really do just need the list of dataelements for that
>> datavalueset. Notice that you do already have t
On 16 July 2012 17:38, Saptarshi Purkayastha wrote:
>
>
> On 16 July 2012 15:21, Bob Jolliffe wrote:
>>
>>
>> If you just want the specification for a single datavalueset template
>> then you really do just need the list of dataelements for that
>> datavalueset. Notice that you do already have t
On 16 July 2012 15:21, Bob Jolliffe wrote:
>
>
> If you just want the specification for a single datavalueset template
> then you really do just need the list of dataelements for that
> datavalueset. Notice that you do already have that list of required
> dataelements in the dataset xml - unfortu
Including type ...
On 16 July 2012 14:21, Bob Jolliffe wrote:
> On 16 July 2012 13:46, Saptarshi Purkayastha wrote:
>> Hi Bob,
>>
>> This is very interesting.
>> Much closer to xforms where the form is sent without the dataValues and can
>> be filled with values and sent back.
>>
>> Some comment
On 16 July 2012 13:46, Saptarshi Purkayastha wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> This is very interesting.
> Much closer to xforms where the form is sent without the dataValues and can
> be filled with values and sent back.
>
> Some comments:
> 1.) I wonder though why you are sending all the dataElements in the
Hi Bob,
This is very interesting.
Much closer to xforms where the form is sent without the dataValues and can
be filled with values and sent back.
Some comments:
1.) I wonder though why you are sending all the dataElements in the xml??
Is that required or we should be able to generate only those
6 matches
Mail list logo
