Re: [Dhis2-users] [Dhis2-devs] release cycle: from 4 to 3 releases per year

2017-02-06 Thread Marta Vila
Hi Bob,

deployments like the ones in MSF with online/offline instances will
definitely benefit from the approach that you described.

cheers

Marta

Marta

On 3 February 2017 at 12:55, Bob Jolliffe  wrote:

> Lars, has there been any recent discussion over adopting an ubuntu-style
> approach of two types of release?
>
> I think a lot of people running large national setups with 1000's of users
> would be happy to see a long-term-service release maybe once a year with at
> least guaranteed security related backports for maybe two years.  Then
> maybe two more bleeding edge releases in the year for those who really need
> the latest functionality and have the agility to upgrade frequently.
>
> The numbers above can be different, but I think the idea of two types of
> release might have some merit.   I wonder what would be the main arguments
> for and against.  We want to continue to release-often-release-early to
> maintain momentum.  But also provide some stability.  These aims tend to
> work against each other :-)  Anyway I'd be interested to hear what people
> think.
>
> On 3 February 2017 at 09:40, Lars Helge Øverland  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> we would like to let you know that the release cycle for DHIS 2 will be
>> be shifting from 4 to 3 yearly releases. The upcoming releases look like
>> this:
>>
>> 2.27: June 1, 2017
>> 2.28: October 1, 2017
>> 2.29: February 1, 2018
>>
>>
>> A few observations led to this change:
>>
>> - The machinery around DHIS 2 of documentation, academy materials,
>> release notes, web pages and so on is getting larger and the overhead of
>> updating it for each release is becoming significant.
>>
>> - Implementing organizations seem to be lagging a few releases behind the
>> latest on average in terms of testing and roll-out. This leads to a large
>> demand for back-porting of fixes and even features, consuming a lot of
>> developer time.
>>
>>
>> So by reducing the number of releases by one we hope to reduce the
>> overhead and free more time for new development. We promise to remain agile
>> and user-driven in spite of this change.
>>
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> Lars
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lars Helge Øverland
>> Lead developer, DHIS 2
>> University of Oslo
>> Skype: larshelgeoverland
>> l...@dhis2.org
>> http://www.dhis2.org 
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>> Post to : dhis2-d...@lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
> Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Dhis2-users] [Dhis2-devs] release cycle: from 4 to 3 releases per year

2017-02-03 Thread Bob Jolliffe
Lars, has there been any recent discussion over adopting an ubuntu-style
approach of two types of release?

I think a lot of people running large national setups with 1000's of users
would be happy to see a long-term-service release maybe once a year with at
least guaranteed security related backports for maybe two years.  Then
maybe two more bleeding edge releases in the year for those who really need
the latest functionality and have the agility to upgrade frequently.

The numbers above can be different, but I think the idea of two types of
release might have some merit.   I wonder what would be the main arguments
for and against.  We want to continue to release-often-release-early to
maintain momentum.  But also provide some stability.  These aims tend to
work against each other :-)  Anyway I'd be interested to hear what people
think.

On 3 February 2017 at 09:40, Lars Helge Øverland  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> we would like to let you know that the release cycle for DHIS 2 will be be
> shifting from 4 to 3 yearly releases. The upcoming releases look like this:
>
> 2.27: June 1, 2017
> 2.28: October 1, 2017
> 2.29: February 1, 2018
>
>
> A few observations led to this change:
>
> - The machinery around DHIS 2 of documentation, academy materials, release
> notes, web pages and so on is getting larger and the overhead of updating
> it for each release is becoming significant.
>
> - Implementing organizations seem to be lagging a few releases behind the
> latest on average in terms of testing and roll-out. This leads to a large
> demand for back-porting of fixes and even features, consuming a lot of
> developer time.
>
>
> So by reducing the number of releases by one we hope to reduce the
> overhead and free more time for new development. We promise to remain agile
> and user-driven in spite of this change.
>
>
> best regards,
>
> Lars
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Lars Helge Øverland
> Lead developer, DHIS 2
> University of Oslo
> Skype: larshelgeoverland
> l...@dhis2.org
> http://www.dhis2.org 
>
>
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
> Post to : dhis2-d...@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp