On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:00 AM, dia-list-requ...@gnome.org wrote:
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 15:34:25 -0500
From: Dan Katz dpkatz...@gmail.com
Yes of course. I think it's a bit easier with names because you can
introspect
on them in the python REPL using 'dir' and 'help' and such, but looking
Since you understand your need and desire for documentation better than
anyone, perhaps you are the best one to add the explanation?
M
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Dan Katz dpkatz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Hans Breuer wrote:
But I don't see why you could not use
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 7:00 AM, dia-list-requ...@gnome.org wrote:
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:07:02 -0500
From: Dan Katz dpkatz...@gmail.com
A bit of context: I'm writing a Python plug-in for Dia which
translates a data-flow diagram to code in a home-grown legacy
job-control language. The
to have named connection points and that they were removed in 2009
(https://mail.gnome.org/archives/commits-list/2009-August/msg00148.html).
I guess I have two questions: could we bring back named connection
points,
Not without a convincing use case. As my removal comment says they were
unused
At 17.02.2012 19:24, Ron Wilson wrote:
[...]
The check-in comment removing named CPs claimed lack of use in
the core objects and some memory savings as the rationale for deleting
them. My use case, though, involves custom objects rather than core
objects, and I'm not sure that the memory savings
. I actually got so far as beginning to hack
the C code to add this capability when I found that Dia actually used
to have named connection points and that they were removed in 2009
(https://mail.gnome.org/archives/commits-list/2009-August/msg00148.html).
I guess I have two questions: could we
