A late reply (sorry!) to Alejandro.
From: Alejandro Imass aim...@yabarana.com
We are not UML experts by any means, being a small and dynamic shop so
we only use about 5/6 artifacts in most of our work:
1) Use Cases: extensively used during requirements phases and also
internally to
From: Michael Ross michael.e.r...@gmail.com
Other than to write my own shapes This is the only way any shapes arise.
Someone has to do it.
Michael: fair enough, I phrased the question badly. I guess I should have
asked Does anyone know of any attempts to facilitate UML 2 for Dia (either
Stuart,
I am probably extending your last question outside the UML universe and you
intention...
where (if at all) do you need to use shapes outside the UML set?
I do all my work outside the UML set, and the beauty of Dia is its
flexibility at a low level. I always need shapes outside the UML
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Stuart Rossiter
stuart.p.rossi...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
From: Alejandro Imass aim...@yabarana.com
What exactly are you missing for UML 2? We use the UML 2 standard with
DIA (albeit not religiously a la OMG/Rational) but we are very fluent
in V2 and we
From: Michael Ross michael.e.r...@gmail.com
I am probably extending your last question outside the UML universe and you
intention...
Uh, yes but that's OK :-)
where (if at all) do you need to use shapes outside the UML set?
I do all my work outside the UML set, and the beauty of Dia is
I'm sure this has been asked before, but the archive Search box is broken
and I didn't see anything in the FAQ or via some Web search.
The currently include UML shapes in Dia (which I use all the time) are for
UML 1.x (not sure exactly which variant). Is there any intention to provide
updates for
Hi Stuart,
Other than to write my own shapes This is the only way any shapes arise.
Someone has to do it.
Any shapes that are not present simply have not had a volunteer author. It
is probably good to tell someone if you intend to work on a set, so there
is no duplication while it is a work
