Dr. Steve Eskow wrote:
>In response to Peter Lopez Taran wrote this:
>
>
>
Because I do not wish to disrupt this list with anything further, I'm
taking a break from DDN's email list. If anyone needs to contact me, my
email address is below.
--
Taran Rampersad
Presently in: San Fernando, Trinid
For those of you wondering what this is in reference to, I've asked
Taran and Steve to take a break from their debates. I've received many
emails complaining about the tone of these debates, so I've asked them
to take a break.
thanks,
ac
Taran Rampersad wrote:
Dr. Steve Eskow wrote:
In re
This looks so interesting, but the page doesn't exist - please check
URL.
Thanks,
Tanya Priber
On Oct 12, 2005, at 4:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.gdrc.org/uem/1000-village.htm
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.o
as well the brothers and sisters of Peter Lopez in the American Indian
communities. We have neglected those communities. Bonnie Bracey Sutton
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivi
In response to Peter Lopez Taran wrote this:
<>
One of the admirable things about the United States of America as it has
been historically is that many of its Ph.d's come from what people without
the degree call "disadvantaged backgrounds"One such Ph.d., who I've known
all my life, comes from a
Peter S. Lopez wrote:
>REPLY ~
>Wednesday Morning ~ I agree with you Dr. Eskow and am pleased at your common
>sense.
>
>I am not sure how many people on this DDN Discussion List are actually poor
>themselves in the economic sense. Nevertheless, we must all clearly understand
>that the ‘big fac
Steve,
While I understand your point, I think you fail to understand my point -
at least judging by your response. You see, the point is that technology
is changing while this discussion takes place, and like it or not the
'social computer', as you call it, is indeed increasingly becoming the
pers
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 10:09 AM
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion GROUP; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GROUP
Subject: RE: [DDN] A Littl' More On Bridging the Digital Divide in the US
"Dr. Steve Eskow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
< wrote:
>
And of
I struggle with this $100 dollar initiative because I know that in many
countries, onehundred US dollars is a LOT of money. There were some initiatives
that were a locational resource that served whole villages through UNESCO.
If the world were a village of 1,000 people ...
Dona Meadows
If th
gt; Steve Eskow
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Taran
> Rampersad
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 8:58 AM
> To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
> Subject: Re: [DD
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 10:09 AM
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion GROUP; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GROUP
Subject: RE: [DDN] A Littl' More On Bridging the Digital Divide in the US
"Dr. Steve Eskow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
"Dr. Steve Eskow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
< wrote:
>
And of course Ronda is joined is this conviction by Negroponte and many
others.
My own hunch is that leaping the stage of "the social computer" and moving
immediately to "the personal computer" is an invitation to failure.
Unless the compu
Network discussion group
Subject: Re: [DDN] A Littl' More On Bridging the Digital Divide in the
US
Dr. Steve Eskow wrote:
>My own hunch is that leaping the stage of "the social computer" and moving
>immediately to "the personal computer" is an invitation to fail
>
> < is obsolete— disadvantaged kids, starting at a the preschool level, need a
> computer in their home in order to have a chance at parity with their more
> affluent counterparts. Want to Improve High Schools? Put Computers in the
> Homes. is now published on the Digital Divide Network websit
Dr. Steve Eskow wrote:
>My own hunch is that leaping the stage of "the social computer" and moving
>immediately to "the personal computer" is an invitation to failure.
>
>
Well, if you think in terms of computers, I can understand that hunch.
But a network of computers is a separate thing; a 'so
< wrote:
<>
And of course Ronda is joined is this conviction by Negroponte and many
others.
My own hunch is that leaping the stage of "the social computer" and moving
immediately to "the personal computer" is an invitation to failure.
Unless the computers never need servicing, never get infe
Ronda Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The concept of computer labs as the answer for bridging the digital divide is
obsolete disadvantaged kids, starting at a the preschool level, need a
computer in their home in order to have a chance at parity with their more
affluent counterparts. Want to I
17 matches
Mail list logo
