On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 11:48:26 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 15/04/2015 11:44 p.m., Chris wrote:
My garbage collected app starts with ~10 MB in memory, however
with
every execution of code it grows by at least 0.2 MB (or more
depending
on the input). Although I can see memory being
On 16/04/2015 12:03 a.m., Chris wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 11:48:26 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 15/04/2015 11:44 p.m., Chris wrote:
My garbage collected app starts with ~10 MB in memory, however with
every execution of code it grows by at least 0.2 MB (or more depending
on the
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 13:18:55 UTC, Panke wrote:
There will always be a better solution in the future than the
implementation included in the standard library today. However
that is no argument against the kitchen sink.
That's dodging the foundational issue which is that different
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 21:35 +, weaselcat via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
For the amount of complaining about make, there sure has been
little process in making a better make.
Isn't that the whole point, something better than make is not make, it
is something else.
--
Russel.
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 12:36:16 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Nope. Good API isn't good enough. For things like window
creation, image library ext. If they ain't in phobos, it ain't
gonna get used.
That's my experience with Devisualization anyway.
Go, Dart, Python and Javascript are
On 16/04/2015 12:00 a.m., Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 11:45:37 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
I understand such a library collection would have many holes right
now, but movement also creates its own momentum. I just think
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 13:06:26 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
See: python, many people actively avoid using the standard
library in favor of third party libraries that accomplish the
same task.
Some third party libaries are considered defacto standard and are
shipped with distributions or
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 13:40:36 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 13:18:55 UTC, Panke wrote:
There will always be a better solution in the future than the
implementation included in the standard library today. However
that is no argument against the kitchen
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 13:19:32 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 13:06:26 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
See: python, many people actively avoid using the standard
library in favor of third party libraries that accomplish the
same task.
Some third party libaries
On 4/15/15 8:35 AM, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 11:18:03 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
immutable blocksize = GByte.sizeof * x_block_size * y_block_size;
auto buffer = malloc(blocksize)[0..blocksize];
Also, you don't need to cast pointers to void *. Should be able
Exactly, and with the overlapping efforts the result is less than
the division among the parts, because none of them reach critical
mass.
But this has already been kind of done in the past regarding
Tango vs. Phobos. I think it would be good to extend the same
guidance to a gradually growing
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 08:32:10 UTC, wobbles wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 07:27:51 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 16:17:37 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
EMSI is hiring for an Engineer II to work on D codebases:
https://
emsi.bamboohr.com/jobs/view.php?id=30
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14436
--- Comment #4 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com ---
By empty array do you mean empty array literal?
eg assert(x != []);
--
On 15/04/2015 11:44 p.m., Chris wrote:
My garbage collected app starts with ~10 MB in memory, however with
every execution of code it grows by at least 0.2 MB (or more depending
on the input). Although I can see memory being freed (say it goes up to
32 MB and drops to 14 MB), it keeps on growing
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 12:00:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
clip
Yes, there is a lot of overlap in the D community: 4 D compiler
projects, a bunch of IDE projects, a bunch of GUI library
projects, a bunch of (basic) game engine projects... All rather
large in scope if you want
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:01:54 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
That list is small compared to the whole of available Python
libraries, but what you can do with it is already enormously
more than you can do with Phobos or CRT+STL. If D had half of
it people would be using it...
Yes, it is the
On 4/15/15 9:15 AM, rcorre wrote:
For those who don't know, ycmd (https://github.com/Valloric/ycmd) is an
editor-agnostic completion engine that aims to reduce a lot of the
duplicate code written for handling autocompletions in different
language/editor combinations.
A long time ago, there was
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 11:45:37 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
I understand such a library collection would have many holes
right now, but movement also creates its own momentum. I just
think it would be good that dlang.org provided some more
guidance.
Yes, there is a lot of overlap in the D
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 09:57:29 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 09:39:09 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
Nowadays a standard library should include classes or
functions, not only for data structures, algorithms etc., but
also for: GUI cross-platform creation, graphics,
For those who don't know, ycmd (https://github.com/Valloric/ycmd)
is an editor-agnostic completion engine that aims to reduce a lot
of the duplicate code written for handling autocompletions in
different language/editor combinations.
A long time ago, there was a request to get D support
The problem with a kitchen sink approach is that you have to
make sure the libraries stay up to date - and phobos already
has a few rotting modules.
Which modules do you mean? There are some modules that are
considered to have a bad design or lacking implementation, but
none that do not
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14436
Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
I understand such a library collection would have many holes
right now, but movement also creates its own momentum. I just
think it would be good that dlang.org provided some more guidance.
I don't know, I hope to get some time on lazy Sundays to finally
read Alexandrescu's book which I
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 08:01 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
Sadly I can't make it because newborn. -- Andrei
Of course. Pete Goodliffe has stepped into the breach.
--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 11:18:03 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/15/15 12:47 AM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 04:43:39 UTC, Daniel Kozák
wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 04:24:20 +
Craig Dillabaugh via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 11:18:03 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
clip
Depends on what GByte is. If it doesn't contain pointers (I'm
assuming its probably ubyte?), then it won't be scanned.
clip
-Steve
Yes, GByte is an alias for ubyte.
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 15:12:00 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/15/15 10:47 AM, weaselcat wrote:
DCD has been usable from vim for a looong time, when was the
last time
you tried?
Dconf 2014.
I'm sure with more elbow grease I could get it to work. But I
shouldn't have to ;)
On 4/15/15 10:47 AM, weaselcat wrote:
DCD has been usable from vim for a looong time, when was the last time
you tried?
Dconf 2014.
I'm sure with more elbow grease I could get it to work. But I shouldn't
have to ;) Give me a dmg that I can drag or script that I can run, I'm good.
-Steve
On 4/15/15 11:13 AM, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 15:12:00 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 4/15/15 10:47 AM, weaselcat wrote:
DCD has been usable from vim for a looong time, when was the last time
you tried?
Dconf 2014.
I'm sure with more elbow grease I could get it
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:46:40 -0400, ketmar ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:20:38 -0400, bitwise wrote:
i believe that you can't do what you want in a way you want, 'cause UFCS
is not working for template args. but you can do this:
alias base(alias CC) =
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:47:46 UTC, armando sano wrote:
Reviving old topic... It is possible to force stdout to write
in binary mode on Windows, see
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/tw4k6df8.aspx
In C, the solution is:
-
#include stdio.h
#include
On 4/15/15 10:44 AM, Idan Arye wrote:
import std.stdio;
struct Foo {
bool registered = false;
void register(int x) {
writeln(Registering , x);
register = true;
}
}
void main() {
Foo foo;
foo.register(10);
}
Easy, the bug is in DMD improperly
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 05:31:24 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
It needs to be possible to set and get a value of an instance variable
based on it's name, through runtime reflection. It also needs to bypass
protection, i.e. private.
Right now, this is the def:
/**
* Array of
Reviving old topic... It is possible to force stdout to write in
binary mode on Windows, see
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/tw4k6df8.aspx
In C, the solution is:
-
#include stdio.h
#include fcntl.h
#include io.h
/*...*/
int result = _setmode( _fileno(
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:44:48 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
register = true;
Easy, you assigned to the wrong variable, that'd quickly be
obvious at runtime too with a stack overflow.
I think it sucks that true and false will implicitly convert to
int though, that bites people
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:05:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/15/15 9:15 AM, rcorre wrote:
For those who don't know, ycmd
(https://github.com/Valloric/ycmd) is an
editor-agnostic completion engine that aims to reduce a lot of
the
duplicate code written for handling
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:46:56 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:44:48 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
register = true;
Easy, you assigned to the wrong variable, that'd quickly be
obvious at runtime too with a stack overflow.
I think it sucks that true and
On 4/15/15 10:47 AM, armando sano wrote:
Reviving old topic... It is possible to force stdout to write in binary
mode on Windows, see https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/tw4k6df8.aspx
In C, the solution is:
-
#include stdio.h
#include fcntl.h
#include io.h
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:44:48 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
import std.stdio;
struct Foo {
bool registered = false;
void register(int x) {
writeln(Registering , x);
register = true;
}
}
void main() {
Foo foo;
foo.register(10);
}
register = true
So many good ideas and points posted. Something should come out
after this discussion...
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:07:11 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I think maybe a modular approach is better, to have different
profiles:
1. foundational libraries (basic types)
2. architecture
import std.stdio;
struct Foo {
bool registered = false;
void register(int x) {
writeln(Registering , x);
register = true;
}
}
void main() {
Foo foo;
foo.register(10);
}
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:52:19 -0400, anonymous anonym...@example.com
wrote:
abstract class Refl {
@property abstract string name() const;
immutable(Refl) base() const;
}
class ClassRefl(T) : Refl {
@property override string name() const {
return T.stringof;
}
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:03:13 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
No. We were talking about parts of e.g. the python standard
library that have been completely superseded by third party
solutions at least for new projects.
Well, that has not happend. What has happend is that people use a
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 15:22:27 UTC, Chris wrote:
I get the following message from dub when using
--build=release:
Linking...
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 15:36:44 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
That looks like good architecture. I'm not sure if 2 and 3
wouldn't be at the same level of (non-) dependency? Or maybe
it's the image processing example you've used. In any case 2
would have more priority because of practical
BTW, if I remove USE_OPENGL works fine :)
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:02:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/15/15 8:35 AM, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 11:18:03 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
immutable blocksize = GByte.sizeof * x_block_size *
y_block_size;
auto buffer =
On 4/15/15 11:02 AM, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
Nice. Thanks. I didn't realize you can slice a bare pointer like that.
Does druntime have any way of making sure that is safe, or are you on
your own?
No, druntime cannot know what the pointer actually points at. This would
not work in @safe
At
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/typecons_ex.d#L143
I can't figure out how to make the call to
mixin genOps!I;
expand to, for instance,
mixin genOps!Index
in the case when I = Index.
Help please.
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 15:49:10 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 15:36:44 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
That looks like good architecture. I'm not sure if 2 and 3
wouldn't be at the same level of (non-) dependency? Or maybe
it's the image processing example you've
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 07:27:49 +, Abdulhaq wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 16:17:37 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
EMSI is hiring for an Engineer II to work on D codebases:
https://
emsi.bamboohr.com/jobs/view.php?id=30
When it said Moscow I was thinking mmmh lots of traffic, a bit
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 12:30:08 UTC, Baz wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 08:32:10 UTC, wobbles wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 07:27:51 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 16:17:37 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
EMSI is hiring for an Engineer II to work on D
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12603
Clement Courbet c...@somebod.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@somebod.com
---
i was watching an interesting PyCon talk on Rust Python and I
wanted to share it here since i know there are people using PyD.
you can watch the talk at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CwJ0MH-4MA. it looks really nice
and easy.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14450
Issue ID: 14450
Summary: Incorrect overloading of immutable constructor for
template struct
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status:
Hello everyone!
I managed to find time to handle the proofreads and translations I got
these last months.
I updated the book at http://dlang-fr.org/cours/programmer-en-d/
Four new chapter are available and chapter 1 to 31 (Tableaux
associatifs) have been proofread.
proofreads and another
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:44:48 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
import std.stdio;
struct Foo {
bool registered = false;
void register(int x) {
writeln(Registering , x);
register = true;
}
}
void main() {
Foo foo;
foo.register(10);
}
Property assignment
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 15:17:27 UTC, Jürgen Reichmann
wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:47:46 UTC, armando sano wrote:
Reviving old topic... It is possible to force stdout to write
in binary mode on Windows, see
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/tw4k6df8.aspx
In C, the
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 17:28:01 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:44:48 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
import std.stdio;
struct Foo {
bool registered = false;
void register(int x) {
writeln(Registering , x);
register = true;
}
}
void main() {
On 04/15/2015 10:50 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
pragma(msg) has been added to Programming in D but it is not available
online yet:
Sorry for the spam :( but apparently it is already online:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/templates.html#ix_templates.pragma
Ali
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:52:19 -0400, anonymous anonym...@example.com
wrote:
Parting thoughts:
I don't know where you're heading with this. But so far I don't see what
it would buy you over std.traits and TypeInfo/TypeInfo_Class.
Forgot to mention support for runtime reflection.
See here:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 08:32:10 UTC, wobbles wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 07:27:51 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 16:17:37 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
EMSI is hiring for an Engineer II to work on D codebases:
https://
emsi.bamboohr.com/jobs/view.php?id=30
On 4/15/15 1:44 PM, Caspar wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 17:28:01 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:44:48 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
import std.stdio;
struct Foo {
bool registered = false;
void register(int x) {
writeln(Registering , x);
Hello everyone!
I managed to find time to handle the proofreads and translations I got
these last months.
I updated the book at http://dlang-fr.org/cours/programmer-en-d/
Four new chapter are available and chapter 1 to 31 (Tableaux
associatifs) have been proofread.
proofreads and another
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:26:48 -0400, bitwise bitwise@gmail.com wrote:
But AFAIK, this is NOT ok in C++ because of the way inheritance works..
is this safe in D?
To clarify, I'm talking about doing doing things by Object pointer or void
pointer, which seems to work fine:
class Test {
On 04/13/2015 07:44 AM, matovitch wrote:
Thanks for the tip ! I was looking at something like this.
pragma(msg) has been added to Programming in D but it is not available
online yet:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:53:05 +, Andrea Fontana wrote:
My 2 cents. If I remember correctly, @ prefix in @safe, @trusted,
@system, etc was added just to avoid keywords pollution, right?
Now UDA uses the same prefix: if some new keywords/properties/attributes
will be added to D, the same
On 04/15/2015 09:21 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
At
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/typecons_ex.d#L143
I can't figure out how to make the call to
mixin genOps!I;
expand to, for instance,
mixin genOps!Index
This seems to work:
mixin genOps!(mixin(I));
in the case when
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 15:17:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Easy, the bug is in DMD improperly accepting property
assignment without @property annotation :P
We've found the winner!
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 16:19:07 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
For Satellite image processing at least GDAL can take care of
most of the memory/image handling stuff. I have some D Bindings
(largely untested).
Maybe a good idea would be to collect bindings for a single
domain (like image
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 15:17:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/15/15 10:44 AM, Idan Arye wrote:
import std.stdio;
struct Foo {
bool registered = false;
void register(int x) {
writeln(Registering , x);
register = true;
}
}
void main() {
Foo foo;
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 19:16:55 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/15/15 3:09 PM, =?UTF-8?B?Ik3DoXJjaW8=?= Martins\
marcio...@gmail.com\ wrote:
Hi!
I use Appender a lot, and find it ugly to write this all the
time to
efficiently construct strings:
app.put(foo);
app.put(var);
On 04/15/2015 12:09 PM, =?UTF-8?B?Ik3DoXJjaW8=?= Martins\
marcio...@gmail.com\ wrote:
Hi!
I use Appender a lot, and find it ugly to write this all the time to
efficiently construct strings:
app.put(foo);
app.put(var);
app.put(bar);
How about this instead?
app.put(foo, var, bar);
Agreed.
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 19:41:13 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
Appender will take a range, so you can also do:
app.put([foo, var, bar]);
or
app.put(chain(foo, var, bar));
But yes, a variadic put would be convenient so long as it wasn't
ambiguous in some way.
I guess chain could work in
On 04/15/2015 02:40 PM, Mengu wrote:
i was watching an interesting PyCon talk on Rust Python and I wanted to
share it here since i know there are people using PyD.
you can watch the talk at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CwJ0MH-4MA. it
looks really nice and easy.
I'm now regretting
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 19:09:42 UTC, Márcio Martins wrote:
Hi!
I use Appender a lot, and find it ugly to write this all the
time to efficiently construct strings:
app.put(foo);
app.put(var);
app.put(bar);
Sidetracking a bit, but when I started using Appender I was
surprised to
Appender will take a range, so you can also do:
app.put([foo, var, bar]);
or
app.put(chain(foo, var, bar));
But yes, a variadic put would be convenient so long as it wasn't
ambiguous in some way.
On 2015-04-15 17:26, bitwise wrote:
Right now, this is the def:
/**
* Array of pairs giving the offset and type information for each
* member in an aggregate.
*/
struct OffsetTypeInfo
{
size_t offset;/// Offset of member from start of object
TypeInfo ti;///
On 04/15/2015 12:19 PM, Nordlöw wrote:
I'm using DMD 2.067.
Mee too. The following is the minimum amount of code I used, which compiles:
import std.traits;
import std.range;
struct Index(T = size_t) if (isUnsigned!T)
{
this(T ix) { this._ix = ix; }
T opCast(U : T)() const { return
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 19:49:10 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:44:00 +, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
Yes, isn't it weird how regimes put little versions of their
capitals in
other countries? Is it a planned exile strategy in case of a
new
revolution?
Moscow,
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 19:15:36 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
errors
typecons_ex.d(135,5): Error: mixin
typecons_ex.IndexedBy!(int[3], I).IndexedBy.genOps!I does
not match template declaration genOps(T)
typecons_ex.d(152,12): Error: template instance
typecons_ex.IndexedBy!(int[3], I) error
On 4/15/15 3:09 PM, =?UTF-8?B?Ik3DoXJjaW8=?= Martins\
marcio...@gmail.com\ wrote:
Hi!
I use Appender a lot, and find it ugly to write this all the time to
efficiently construct strings:
app.put(foo);
app.put(var);
app.put(bar);
How about this instead?
app.put(foo, var, bar);
This would be
I'm using DMD 2.067.
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 17:03:36 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
This seems to work:
mixin genOps!(mixin(I));
I'm afraid not:
mixin genOps!(mixin(I));
errors
typecons_ex.d(135,5): Error: mixin typecons_ex.IndexedBy!(int[3],
I).IndexedBy.genOps!I does not match template declaration
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 18:25:33 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 15:17:32 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 4/15/15 10:44 AM, Idan Arye wrote:
import std.stdio;
struct Foo {
bool registered = false;
void register(int x) {
writeln(Registering , x);
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 20:12:27 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Ali
I cracked it:
Reason: I hade a failing unittest using it as
auto xs = x.indexedBy!I;
which I changed to
auto xs = x.indexedBy!Ix;
For some reason the mixin magic becomes confused when I equals
I.
Do you have
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:48:28 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2015-04-15 17:26, bitwise wrote:
Right now, this is the def:
/**
* Array of pairs giving the offset and type information for each
* member in an aggregate.
*/
struct OffsetTypeInfo
{
size_t offset;///
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:11:39 +, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
That fact puts Orwell's writings in a new light.
Oooh, an Animal Farm reference; spooky.
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:32:52 +, Kapps wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 12:08:54 UTC, D Denizen since a year wrote:
A friend has been invited to be a consultant for an investment bank
that would like to build a set of analytics for fixed income products.
The team is currently quite
One more thing.
I had to add a virtual destructor to A to get this to work:
class A {
public: int a; virtual ~A(){}
};
//
A *d2 = (A*)d;
cout boolalpha (typeid(*d2) == typeid(D)) endl;
C *d3 = (C*)d;
cout boolalpha (typeid(*d3) == typeid(D)) endl;
Output is now:
true
false
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 20:59:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
with(app)
{
put(var);
put(bar);
put(more);
put(stuff);
}
-Steve
Awesome.
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 20:44:07 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/15/2015 12:09 PM, =?UTF-8?B?Ik3DoXJjaW8=?= Martins\
marcio...@gmail.com\ wrote:
Hi!
I use Appender a lot, and find it ugly to write this all the
time to
efficiently construct strings:
app.put(foo);
app.put(var);
At any rate I believe this modular / one domain at a time and
layered approach would be the correct one, and setting
priorities. Then we'd have to eventually start sooner than later
filling out implementations, because the optimal previous design
time is sadly always less than infinite. :o)
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 12:08:54 UTC, D Denizen since a year
wrote:
A friend has been invited to be a consultant for an investment
bank that would like to build a set of analytics for fixed
income products. The team is currently quite small - about 5
C++ developers - and the idea is to
On 4/15/15 6:42 PM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 20:12:27 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Ali
I cracked it:
Reason: I hade a failing unittest using it as
auto xs = x.indexedBy!I;
which I changed to
auto xs = x.indexedBy!Ix;
For some reason the mixin magic becomes
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 17:53:24 UTC, Jürgen Reichmann
wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 15:17:27 UTC, Jürgen Reichmann
wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:47:46 UTC, armando sano
wrote:
Reviving old topic... It is possible to force stdout to write
in binary mode on Windows,
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 13:15:31 UTC, rcorre wrote:
For those who don't know, ycmd
(https://github.com/Valloric/ycmd) is an editor-agnostic
completion engine that aims to reduce a lot of the duplicate
code written for handling autocompletions in different
language/editor combinations.
On 04/15/2015 03:42 PM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 20:12:27 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Ali
I cracked it:
Reason: I hade a failing unittest using it as
auto xs = x.indexedBy!I;
which I changed to
auto xs = x.indexedBy!Ix;
For some reason the mixin magic
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 22:32:53 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 12:08:54 UTC, D Denizen since a
year wrote:
A friend has been invited to be a consultant for an investment
bank that would like to build a set of analytics for fixed
income products. The team is currently
On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 05:07:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Of course, you can go to all the trouble of coming up with a
list of action items and nobody outside the core group may
still contribute, as I said from the beginning. But if you
don't make it easier for new or non-core contributors,
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
