On Thursday, 4 May 2017 at 06:35:39 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Saturday, 29 April 2017 at 20:46:06 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
The last bit of news I've received is they will be streamed on
youtube this time.
Is there any update on this? (Preferably in the form of a URL)
Yeah, hopefully the
On Saturday, 29 April 2017 at 20:46:06 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
The last bit of news I've received is they will be streamed on
youtube this time.
Is there any update on this? (Preferably in the form of a URL)
On 5/3/17 5:05 PM, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 14:38:41 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 13:36:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I am at the Ludwig van Beethoven hotel. Just had a 2 hour nap,
couldn't sleep on the plane. So a few beers will do me w
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 19:41:58 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On Saturday, 29 April 2017 at 23:57:07 UTC, Carl Sturtivant
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 05:41:43 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
Even better, with alias for embedded aliased-to-this structs
made working usefully, name management can be do
On Saturday, 29 April 2017 at 23:57:07 UTC, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 05:41:43 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
Even better, with alias for embedded aliased-to-this structs
made working usefully, name management can be done before
embedding the features, by having another layer
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 15:09:03 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 12:58:17 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
The trick is that your child class need to have defined at
least 1 constructor before the alias.
This should work:
this() {}
alias __ctor = super.__ctor;
This will give t
Am Wed, 03 May 2017 01:02:38 +
schrieb Moritz Maxeiner :
> On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 23:27:28 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> > Am Tue, 02 May 2017 20:53:50 +
> > schrieb Moritz Maxeiner :
> >
> >> On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 19:34:44 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I see what you're doi
On 05/03/2017 05:09 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 12:58:17 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
The trick is that your child class need to have defined at least 1
constructor before the alias.
This should work:
this() {}
alias __ctor = super.__ctor;
This will give the error message y
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 15:42:18 UTC, Nemanja Boric wrote:
I might be wrong, but it's 6 stops for the Bus/Tram drive, and
only three for the
U/S Bahn drive:
Einzelfahrausweise für Kurzstrecken gelten im Tarifbereich
Berlin (AB,BC,ABC) für bis zu drei Stationen mit der S-Bahn,
U-Bahn oder
On 5/3/17 5:42 PM, Nemanja Boric wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 15:05:02 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 14:38:41 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 13:36:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I am at the Ludwig van Beethoven hotel. Just had a 2 ho
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 15:05:02 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 14:38:41 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 13:36:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I am at the Ludwig van Beethoven hotel. Just had a 2 hour
nap, couldn't sleep on the plane. So a
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 15:05:02 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 14:38:41 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 13:36:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I am at the Ludwig van Beethoven hotel. Just had a 2 hour
nap, couldn't sleep on the plane. So a
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 12:58:17 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
The trick is that your child class need to have defined at
least 1 constructor before the alias.
This should work:
this() {}
alias __ctor = super.__ctor;
This will give the error message you saw:
alias __ctor = super.__ctor;
this() {}
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 14:38:41 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 13:36:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I am at the Ludwig van Beethoven hotel. Just had a 2 hour nap,
couldn't sleep on the plane. So a few beers will do me well
(first of which I'm having now ;). Wh
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 13:36:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I am at the Ludwig van Beethoven hotel. Just had a 2 hour nap,
couldn't sleep on the plane. So a few beers will do me well
(first of which I'm having now ;). Where were you thinking to
meet?
-Steve
Are you still at the ho
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 13:28:50 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 07:42:51 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
Can anyone get me a phillips screwdriver? Seriously. I'll be
at the official hotel or you can lend me one tomorrow morning
at the conference.
I have asked Shai Tayeb h
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 13:50:53 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 13:36:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
(first of which I'm having now ;). Where were you thinking to
meet?
If there's beer where you are, I can get to you. 20 min.
I'm also staying at the Beethov
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 13:36:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
(first of which I'm having now ;). Where were you thinking to
meet?
If there's beer where you are, I can get to you. 20 min.
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 07:42:51 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 20:19:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi, I am very happy to see you soon at dconf.
And I apologize in advance for my nearly slideless talk.
Hope this time there is dmd on the machine!
Cheers Stefan
Well, I h
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 13:14:01 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 07:29:27 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 06:45:05 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 20:19:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi, I am very happy to see you soon at dconf.
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 07:42:51 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
Can anyone get me a phillips screwdriver? Seriously. I'll be at
the official hotel or you can lend me one tomorrow morning at
the conference.
I have asked Shai Tayeb here, Event Manager, and he will bring
one tomorrow.
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 07:29:27 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 06:45:05 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 20:19:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi, I am very happy to see you soon at dconf.
Likewise! I am at the airport as I type.
Bastiaan.
are you i
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 12:16:30 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Actually there is a special syntax that is also used for
shebang style
scripts: `dub app.d arg1 arg2` is equivalent to `dub --quiet
--temp-build --single app.d -- arg1 arg2`. It seems like the
command
line help wasn't really upd
On Sunday, 30 April 2017 at 19:52:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 01:26:09PM +, Stefan Koch via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2017 at 21:05:51 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
> [ ... ]
Big news!
The first step to include debug info has been done.
Yes this means y
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 09:04:31 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I'm guessing everyone will be converging on the conference
hotel as the day goes on?
I imagine I'll wander by there. I'm not staying there, but it is
a quick walk to my accommodation. I land at 20.45 though, so I
hope it's still goi
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 23:09:54 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 21:00:36 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02.05.2017 22:42, MysticZach wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 13:44:03 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
for (;;) {
if (P(a[i]))
return i;
++count;
if (count
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 12:46:19 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 09:13:54 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
However I oppose the other part of the DIP since it's already
possible today.
class FileException : Exception
{
this(ErrorCode error_code, string file = __FILE__, uint
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 09:13:54 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
However I oppose the other part of the DIP since it's already
possible today.
class FileException : Exception
{
this(ErrorCode error_code, string file = __FILE__, uint
line = __LINE__ )
{
super("FileNotFound", file, lin
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 07:35:56 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 06:10:22 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
So you're going to reinvent TCP in your debugging protocol?
No. there is no need for a full blown recovery mechanism.
For the typical usecase a lossless orderd connecti
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 07:35:56 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
For the typical usecase a lossless orderd connection can be
assumed.
- udp is not connection oriented, i.e. there is no connection
- udp is not lossless and pretending it is means setting yourself
up for a headache down the road
- ud
On 03/05/2017 1:13 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 03.05.2017 um 12:54 schrieb Andre Pany:
Hi,
it would be great if we can position D as replacement of Node scripts.
With the --single argument of Dub we have almost everything we need in
this scenario.
But one thing is very odd. If you want to execu
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 04:22:00 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
[...]
I think any ordering should be done explicitly at the debugging
protocol level.
for example when sending sourceline messages the order is given
by the line number and ordering can be done by the application.
It's the same for b
Am 03.05.2017 um 12:54 schrieb Andre Pany:
Hi,
it would be great if we can position D as replacement of Node scripts.
With the --single argument of Dub we have almost everything we need in
this scenario.
But one thing is very odd. If you want to execute the app.d source file
with dub you have t
Hi,
it would be great if we can position D as replacement of Node
scripts. With the --single argument of Dub we have almost
everything we need in this scenario.
But one thing is very odd. If you want to execute the app.d
source file with dub you have to write: dub --single app.d
- You have
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 09:04:31 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 20:19:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi, I am very happy to see you soon at dconf.
And I apologize in advance for my nearly slideless talk.
Hope this time there is dmd on the machine!
Cheers Stefan
I'm guessi
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 08:23:54 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 07:35:56 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 06:10:22 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
So you're going to reinvent TCP in your debugging protocol?
No. there is no need for a full blown recovery mech
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 18:02:15 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 09:03:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
100% in favor of the constructor behavior change in case no
constructor is in the derived class.
I agree.
So do I.
However I oppose the other part of the DIP since it's alre
An article about LLVM jit:
https://webkit.org/blog/5852/introducing-the-b3-jit-compiler/
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 20:19:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi, I am very happy to see you soon at dconf.
And I apologize in advance for my nearly slideless talk.
Hope this time there is dmd on the machine!
Cheers Stefan
I'm guessing everyone will be converging on the conference hotel
as the
On Sunday, 30 April 2017 at 13:26:09 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2017 at 21:05:51 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
[ ... ]
Big news!
The first step to include debug info has been done.
Yes this means you will be able to step through ctfe code while
the compiler executes it.
Thi
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 07:35:56 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 06:10:22 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
So you're going to reinvent TCP in your debugging protocol?
No. there is no need for a full blown recovery mechanism.
For the typical usecase a lossless orderd connecti
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 20:19:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi, I am very happy to see you soon at dconf.
And I apologize in advance for my nearly slideless talk.
Hope this time there is dmd on the machine!
Cheers Stefan
Well, I have too many. Want some?
Can anyone get me a phillips screwdri
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 06:10:22 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
So you're going to reinvent TCP in your debugging protocol?
No. there is no need for a full blown recovery mechanism.
For the typical usecase a lossless orderd connection can be
assumed.
And most things are not order dependent
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 00:05 +0200, Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
[…]
> I've come to like SCons for my C++ projects. Way more so than say
> CMake.
> It would be awesome to have full-fledged support for D there esp. in
> mixed C++ with D setup.
I had been using SCons, SConsolidator,
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 06:45:05 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 20:19:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi, I am very happy to see you soon at dconf.
Likewise! I am at the airport as I type.
Bastiaan.
are you in Berlin already ?
I am going to arrive near 19:00.
Anyone up
On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 15:39 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
[…]
> However, I have to confess that I found Russel's D tooling (the last
> time I tried it anyway, which was a while back) not quite up to what
> I'd
> like it to do. As a result, in my recent projects I've resorted
> simp
46 matches
Mail list logo
