On 19/08/2018 7:16 AM, Manu wrote:
He genuinely believes OMF+OPTLINK should be the deliberate and
preferred default that everyone should be confronted with as their
first experience. It clearly improves new users experience with D.
Has something changed?
Yes. We're adding support
On 8/18/2018 8:55 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 07:50:04 UTC, Dukc wrote:
What's HOPL?
https://hopl4.sigplan.org, presumably. —David
That's right.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17596
--- Comment #23 from Jonathan M Davis ---
And this is my PR with the binding changes that are required to get the
druntime and Phobos unit tests and the dmd test suite passing:
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/2280
(In reply to Martin Nowak
On Monday, 13 August 2018 at 01:12:16 UTC, Joe wrote:
Please Please Please Help, I am desperate!
Many Thanks in Advance for your time & attention,
-joe
I implemented multicast support in vibe.d, I hope looking at the
source can help you:
On 8/18/2018 9:59 AM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
In your mind, what defines the D language's level of success?
It no longer needs me or Andrei.
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 21:10:55 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 11:27:29 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
On 18-08-18 02:31, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 20:27:05 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Its this part that fails... always returns null
HMODULE h =
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 11:27:29 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
On 18-08-18 02:31, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 20:27:05 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Its this part that fails... always returns null
HMODULE h = cast(HMODULE) Runtime.loadLibrary(dllName);
if (h is null) {
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 16:47:35 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce LDC 1.11:
* Based on D 2.081.2.
* Prebuilt packages now using LLVM 6.0.1 and including
additional cross-compilation targets (MIPS, MSP430, RISC-V and
WebAssembly).
* Rudimentary support for compiling & linking directly
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18078
ag0aep6g changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 09:45, Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> Well from my point of view the most important outstanding Windows tasks are:
>
> - help to test, debug, and fix the experimental lld/mingw toolchain
> (https://dlang.org/changelog/2.079.0.html#lld_mingw)
>
> Once this is
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 13:33:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
A friend recommended this article:
http://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/
I found it awesome and would recommend to anyone in this
community. Worth a close read - no skimming,
On 08/18/2018 10:39 AM, Radu wrote:
> On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 08:30:31 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
>> On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 08:22:54 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
>>
>>> It's a little old, but from what I'm reading we need "reputation"
>>> with Microsoft or an EV certificate, or publish
Glad to announce LDC 1.11:
* Based on D 2.081.2.
* Prebuilt packages now using LLVM 6.0.1 and including additional
cross-compilation targets (MIPS, MSP430, RISC-V and WebAssembly).
* Rudimentary support for compiling & linking directly to
WebAssembly. See the dedicated Wiki page [1] for how to
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 07:50:04 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Thursday, 16 August 2018 at 14:11:20 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
we're working on a HOPL submission.
What's HOPL?
https://hopl4.sigplan.org, presumably. —David
On Saturday, August 18, 2018 1:01:18 AM MDT Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 22:08:16 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
> > On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 20:01:32 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> >> Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.082.0 release
> >
> >
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 08:52:53 UTC, Andrey wrote:
I mean - can I skip some arguments and set only one that I want?
Hm, Python, it seems to me, support this feature.
There's no such built-in functionality in the language or
standard library, no. As Jonathan pointed out, this has been
A friend recommended this article:
http://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/
I found it awesome and would recommend to anyone in this community.
Worth a close read - no skimming, no tl;rd etc. The question applicable
to us - where are the best
Okay, cool, thanks for the information. The main reason for
using D versus Java for me at the moment is that array slices
allow me avoid lots of intermediate buffers that Java is forcing
me to use.
Also the line count is about 2/3 of Java. Further I can directly
embed any assembly language I
On 18-08-18 02:31, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 20:27:05 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Its this part that fails... always returns null
HMODULE h = cast(HMODULE) Runtime.loadLibrary(dllName);
if (h is null) {
writeln("error loading");
return;
}
I there any way to see why
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19097
--- Comment #5 from Walter Bright ---
(In reply to Mike Franklin from comment #4)
> How does `return` apply to a function that has no `return` type?
If the return type is 'void', and the first parameter is by 'ref', the 'return'
applies to the
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 00:31:49 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 20:27:05 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Its this part that fails... always returns null
HMODULE h = cast(HMODULE) Runtime.loadLibrary(dllName);
if (h is null) {
writeln("error loading");
return;
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 08:30:31 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 08:22:54 UTC, Mike Franklin
wrote:
It's a little old, but from what I'm reading we need
"reputation" with Microsoft or an EV certificate, or publish
on the Windows Store.
I'm also reading that
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 06:36:36 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Because we have an event loop, we don't need a nursery! It
comes free of charge. It also means we don't need that with
statement... hang on that now becomes await and async! Just
without the await (auto added in scope(exit),
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 08:22:54 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
It's a little old, but from what I'm reading we need
"reputation" with Microsoft or an EV certificate, or publish on
the Windows Store.
I'm also reading that once the executable has been downloaded a
number of times from
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 08:04:41 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I'll research a little and see if I can find some more
information.
This thread was also quite informative:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12311203/how-to-pass-the-smart-screen-on-win8-when-install-a-signed-application
On 18/08/2018 8:04 PM, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 06:52:21 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 22:01:29 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 20:01:32 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Windows installer and binaries are now code-signed -
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 08:04:41 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I'll research a little and see if I can find some more
information.
Ok, so it is indeed signed: https://imgur.com/a/jGdoXSc
I found this which was disappointing:
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 08:04:41 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I get the "Windows Defender SmartScreen prevented an
unrecognized app from starting. Running this app might put
your PC at risk" message. In other words this:
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 06:52:21 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 22:01:29 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 20:01:32 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Windows installer and binaries are now code-signed -
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 07:50:04 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Thursday, 16 August 2018 at 14:11:20 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
we're working on a HOPL submission.
What's HOPL?
http://www.hopl.info/
On Thursday, 16 August 2018 at 14:11:20 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
we're working on a HOPL submission.
What's HOPL?
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 19:28:47 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Now that -m64 + LLD + MINGW works, the question is obvious.
The background idea is of course to allow the use of GDB under
Windows. At first glance the debug info API is not uniform.
This is visible if you compare dmd.backend.dwarf
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 22:08:16 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 20:01:32 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.082.0 release
According to https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18786
VirusTotal used to report a virus for the
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 22:01:29 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 20:01:32 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Windows installer and binaries are now code-signed -
https://dlang.org/changelog/2.082.0.html#signed_windows_binaries
Was this beta installer supposed to be signed?
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 06:47:36 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 04:16:11 UTC, Sean O'Connor
wrote:
What calling convention is used for assembly language in Linux
AMD64?
Normally the parameters go in fixed order into designated
registers.
import std.stdio;
//
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 04:16:11 UTC, Sean O'Connor wrote:
What calling convention is used for assembly language in Linux
AMD64?
Normally the parameters go in fixed order into designated
registers.
import std.stdio;
// Linux AMD64
float* test(float *x,ulong y){
asm{
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19097
--- Comment #4 from Mike Franklin ---
> This situation comes up repeatedly with:
> 1. constructors
> 2. property setters
> 3. put(dest, source) functions
In other words 2 and 3 are functions that return `void`. Constructors are like
`static`
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19097
--- Comment #3 from Mike Franklin ---
Example 2
-
@safe:
void betty(ref scope int* r, return scope int* p)
{
r = p; // (1) Error: scope variable `p` assigned to `r` with longer
lifetime
}
void main()
{
int* p;
int i;
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19097
Mike Franklin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slavo5...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #2 from
39 matches
Mail list logo
