On Thursday, 8 June 2023 at 06:22:08 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 8 June 2023 at 05:52:43 UTC, Benny wrote:
```
```
app.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
GetInterfaceInfo referenced in function _Dmain
app.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
Error: linker
On Thursday, 8 June 2023 at 05:42:20 UTC, novice2 wrote:
On Thursday, 8 June 2023 at 05:29:07 UTC, Benny wrote:
Hello,
Hi!
I'm trying to call the function GetInterfaceInfo
it would be nice to see the code
didn't work.
it would be nice to see specifics (error code, results, etc)
```
Hello,
I'm trying to call the function GetInterfaceInfo of
iphlpapi.dll/runtimes of D, and it didn't work.
I don't know how to call it, or what parameters I should put in.
I checked the Microsoft Windows APIs, the D documentation of the
function, and still, don't succeed.
Can someone please
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r15=ph=plaintext
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14=ph=json
D is finally showing up in the upper and middle parts of the
tests. In some tests Vibe-D ( with LDC ) is showing a 10 to 80
times improvement compared to Round
On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 00:08:56 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 23:50:29 UTC, Ali wrote:
But D, unlike many other languages, promotes itself as
primarily a system programming language
I think that's a mistake too. I'd rebrand it as a "general
purpose"
First of all, please do not repost this on Reddit or any other
forum. This is focused for the D community alone to help deal
with internal issues and it does not need to be ridiculed as this
is a personal opinion.
As some have seen my posting in the past week regarding D, i like
to explain
On Thursday, 1 February 2018 at 15:47:50 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
For me:
aptitude install ldc
aptitude install gdc
aptitude install dmd-bin
aptitude install dub
Seems to work fine, and no conflicts.
[…]
Please try Windows and then come back ;)
On Thursday, 1 February 2018 at 11:21:37 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
D should be proud of having a reference compiler, a GCC-based
one, and an LLVM-based one. This is a Good Thing™, let no-one
undermine this.
Nothing wrong with choice as long as that choice does not
introduces issues.
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 at 11:42:14 UTC, Seb wrote:
Here's a spoiler:
1) Andrei does an excellent job at managing his students [1]
and there work over the last couple of months has been
tremendous. As the experiment with UPB was very successful,
there will be more projects like this
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 at 10:35:06 UTC, Benny wrote:
Let me say this again
*uch* Never mind this rant. I am just fed up with the issues. I
will not post anymore as its just a wast of time for everybody
involved.
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 at 07:56:37 UTC, Andrew Benton
wrote:
If I had to pick a second issue, it's that the ecosystem story
is hard compared to other languages. New programmers aren't
certain what to choose or how to get their environment up and
running. Compared against Rust, Go, and
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 11:55:42 UTC, rjframe wrote:
- I click "Browse All Crates"; the default sort is alphabetical
- not
useful unless I'm just browsing,
Right side:
* Alphabetical
* All-Time Downloads
* Recent Downloads
even then I'd likely want to browse by category.
On Saturday, 27 January 2018 at 22:58:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I never said we should not offer good IDE support, in fact I
said that we *need* good IDE support. But that in no way
justifies the wrong claim that you can't be productive without
an IDE. In fact, I find myself *more* productive
On Saturday, 27 January 2018 at 00:08:17 UTC, Benny wrote:
* Rust: Jetbrain IntelliJ + Rust plugin.
It looks like it has become a official supported plugin by
Jetbrain. Works perfectly out of the box. Impressive results
and issue hinting.
On Friday, 26 January 2018 at 21:59:51 UTC, Dgame wrote:
You are not alone. The existing D-Tools are either really bad
or do not work propely/not out of the box. And I have more
important things to do than trying to setup the tools. Maybe
someone likes that, but not me. But I have to say that
On Friday, 26 January 2018 at 03:40:26 UTC, Rubn wrote:
You seem to be short tempered
You think after two days trying to get a series of plugins to
work?
you tried 2 plugins rather quickly, without even trying to see
if there were configurations or other options you could use to
get
On Friday, 26 January 2018 at 09:02:03 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
While this analysis of language popularity on Github is
enlightening:
http://www.benfrederickson.com/ranking-programming-languages-by-github-users/
What i found interesting is the comparison between the "newer"
languages
On Friday, 26 January 2018 at 07:08:50 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote:
Take this all with a grain of salt: I have only tested this on
Linux and OS X, I have no clue about the situation on Windows.
In general a lot of plugins tend to work better in POSIX systems
then Windows. I think its more a
On Thursday, 25 January 2018 at 21:42:33 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Even one paid developer makes a big difference. You don't need
hundreds. Making the problem harder is that many current D
users don't have an interest in those tools. Therefore you're
drawing from a small pool of part-time
On Thursday, 25 January 2018 at 19:53:39 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
If you write OOP with few templates like often done in C#,
Delphi, or more declarative style like Go or C, then DCD works
fine. Your frustration probably comes from the fact that
popular techniques in D are not supported by DCD:
After months doing a different project, i need a programming
language for a new client with specific needs. D comes to mind.
As usual that involves downloading the compiler (dmd and ldc).
So, lets install Visual Studio Code:
* Code-D Plugin:
- Syntax highlight *check*
- After saving: DMD
21 matches
Mail list logo
