On Tuesday, 30 November 2021 at 09:01:38 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Monday, 29 November 2021 at 14:48:21 UTC, Luís Ferreira
wrote:
[...]
Indeed, gdb assumes calling convention is same as default for
target (actually its been years since I last looked, but are
calling conventions tags in
I've started a thread on this problem on #Learn:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/nmbmvzymsawzywpbt...@forum.dlang.org
Your (the Debuggers community) input would be much appreciated.
I'm referring the original post on the forum, as I'm hoping to
keep all the answers in one place.
This will help
Hello,
I'm trying to use `gdb` to debug D binaries, but I'm having
trouble accessing the methods of a struct or class. It seems that
`gdb` doesn't see them.
Given the following simple example
```
// test.d
struct S
{
int x;
void myPrint() { writefln("x is %s\n", x); }
}
void
On Sunday, 21 November 2021 at 20:48:30 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
[…]
Thank you everyone for an amazing dconf and for your talks.
Looking forward to next year!
Thank you Mike for MC-ing and for taking care of all the aspects
surrounding the event.
Thanks the DLF for the prizes!
On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 at 09:15:57 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
[...]
it will give me a range violation at runtime and not init it
for me at all.
There is `aa.require("a", Foo.init) += 4;` now which solves
this, but I would prefer having the small simple syntax well
defined for all types
On Tuesday, 10 September 2019 at 19:56:20 UTC, Ernesto
Castellotti wrote:
On Monday, 9 September 2019 at 20:26:48 UTC, matheus wrote:
On Thursday, 5 September 2019 at 08:13:14 UTC, Ernesto
Castellotti wrote:
I created a group on Telegram for DLang users, currently it
is composed of about 10
On Monday, 26 August 2019 at 01:06:55 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
The documentation for std.experimental.allocator is a little
dense and I wanted to make sure I am understanding composition
correctly.
[...]
Yes, you are correct.
Edi
On Tuesday, 20 August 2019 at 09:40:06 UTC, Björn Lindström wrote:
Hello,
I've recently decided to pick up D, and have started doing some
exercises on
https://exercism.io/ (a non-profit programming exercise
platform), which I think is an excellent way to pick up the
basics in a new language.
On Monday, 29 July 2019 at 17:32:58 UTC, Matt wrote:
I've noticed that for some ranges in Phobos empty is marked
const (e.g. iota) but for other ranges (e.g. multiwayMerge) it
is not const. Is there a reason why? Isn't empty guaranteed not
to alter the data of the range and so should be const?
Cheers, everybody
I'm working on this as part of my GSoC project [0].
I'm working on building gdc with the auto-generated `frontend.h`
[1], but I'm having some issues
There are functions in dmd that don't have an `extern (C)` or
`extern (C++)` but they are used by gdc (are exposed in `.h`
On Wednesday, 17 July 2019 at 18:35:21 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2019 at 13:56:38 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
[...]
That's awesome! Did the students earn actual credit hours for
this bootcamp, or was it more interest-based?
The summer school was interest-based.
There are quite a few
On Wednesday, 17 July 2019 at 16:36:56 UTC, M.M. wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 July 2019 at 13:56:38 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
Hello,
Edi and myself are glad to announce that the first edition of
the D Summer School that we organized for the students at the
University Politehnica of Bucharest has just
Hello
According to the spec[0], D supports zero length arrays [1].
I have given this a shot at https://run.dlang.io/is/PwbPxJ
Attempting to use the zero-length array results in a compiler
error
`a.contents[2]` -> Error: array index 2 is out of bounds
(*a).contents[0 .. 0]
The way I've
On Friday, 8 February 2019 at 06:55:15 UTC, Jerry wrote:
On Friday, 8 February 2019 at 04:51:08 UTC, Sudhi wrote:
On Friday, 8 February 2019 at 04:30:23 UTC, Arun
Chandrasekaran wrote:
On Friday, 8 February 2019 at 04:13:39 UTC, Sudhi wrote:
[...]
Works fine for me with DMD64 D Compiler
On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 at 19:12:43 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
However, even when allowing (pseudo)duplicates, this means the
distinct intervals with same start but different end
coordinates are not deterministically placed/sorted within the
tree, because they are not sortable with the
On Monday, 4 February 2019 at 22:54:01 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
I tried to implement an interval tree backed by
std.container.rbtree today and fell flat.
A standard way to make an interval tree is to make an augmented
tree; I supposed since rbtree was a generic container and
because I could
On Monday, 26 November 2018 at 09:28:37 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Monday, 26 November 2018 at 09:04:25 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Why is there no
- __traits(isArray, T)
alongside
- __traits(isStaticArray, T) and
- __traits(isAssociativeArray, T)
when dmd already has `ENUMTY.Tarray` alongside
-
On Sunday, 18 November 2018 at 11:29:51 UTC, John Chapman wrote:
On Saturday, 17 November 2018 at 21:11:38 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Saturday, 17 November 2018 at 17:58:54 UTC, John Chapman
wrote:
Has anyone had a similar need and come up with a solution?
You might be able to just pass it
On Thursday, 25 October 2018 at 21:00:46 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 25 October 2018 at 19:56:18 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
The current behavior of the compiler is quite the opposite of
those "same as" above.
Yeah, I guess I am maybe selectively reading the spec in light
of the
On Thursday, 25 October 2018 at 12:55:38 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 25 October 2018 at 12:25:37 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu
wrote:
IMHO, this is a bug. The code should lower to calls to
opAssing for types that define opAssign.
The spec doesn't exactly say it uses memset, but it does
On Thursday, 25 October 2018 at 13:01:06 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu
wrote:
On Thursday, 25 October 2018 at 12:38:44 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Thursday, 25 October 2018 at 12:25:37 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu
wrote:
As I wrote in the comments above, I was expecting `a[] = b[]`
to iterate the slices and
On Thursday, 25 October 2018 at 12:38:44 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Thursday, 25 October 2018 at 12:25:37 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu
wrote:
As I wrote in the comments above, I was expecting `a[] = b[]`
to iterate the slices and assign the elements of b into a.
What really happens is a memcpy: as
Hello, everyone!
I have a question regarding the expected behaviour of the
built-in array's opSliceAssign.
Given the following code:
```
import std.stdio;
struct A
{
int x;
ref A opAssign(A rhs)
{
writefln("slice_bug.opAssign: begin");
return this;
}
}
Hello, everyone!
We, at UPB, have initiated D's participation to ROSEdu Summer of
Code, see http://soc.rosedu.org/2018/.
I will be mentoring a student over the summer and I was wondering
if you have
any suggestions for a project. If there is a library or feature
that you would like
just
On Thursday, 12 April 2018 at 17:09:22 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 12/04/18 18:42, Uknown wrote:
On Thursday, 12 April 2018 at 12:16:53 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
[...]
The problem seems to be that cast is happening at compile
time, as opposed to run time, as you might have already
On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 14:51:24 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 13:51:47 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Well, you know the type, because make returned it no? The
contract is, you call obj = make!X(args), then you have to
call dispose(obj), where obj is of the type X.
On Friday, 6 April 2018 at 21:49:37 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 April 2018 at 09:14:28 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu
wrote:
So, say `reg` is your allocator, your workflow would be
auto obj = reg.make!Type(args);
/* do stuff */
reg.dispose(obj); // If Type has a __dtor, it will call
On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 21:32:47 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/2/18 5:16 PM, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 20:43:01 UTC, Alexandru Jercaianu
wrote:
I am not completely sure how to solve this, but maybe we can
find some clues here [1].
It seems like we should use
On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 10:26:32 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
Hi all,
Let's say we have this code:
struct B
{
int a;
this(int a) immutable
{
this.a = 7;
}
this(int a)
{
this.a = 10;
}
}
void main()
{
B a = immutable B(2);
writeln(a.a);
a.a =
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 at 18:27:49 UTC, Jiyan wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 at 18:23:04 UTC, Jiyan wrote:
Hey,
i thought i had understood postblit, but in my Code the
following is happening (simplified):
struct C
{
this(this){/*Do sth*/}
list!C;
void opAssign(const C c)
{
On Saturday, 17 February 2018 at 12:33:25 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
I'm struggling with making
https://github.com/nordlow/phobos-next/blob/master/src/pure_mallocator.d
callable in pure functions such as here
https://github.com/nordlow/phobos-next/blob/master/src/pure_mallocator.d#L84
Shouldn't a
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 14:26:34 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Have anybody used allocators to construct class instances?
I might be wrong, but I think you are looking for
std.experimental.allocator.make [0]
[0] -
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_experimental_allocator.html#make
On Thursday, 12 October 2017 at 07:17:15 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2017-10-11 21:57, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Hello,
I've hit the following problem on this PR [0]:
The Windows 32bit build fails with the error: "more than 32767
symbols in object file" [1].
After taking a look in
On Wednesday, 11 October 2017 at 09:39:04 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 October 2017 at 09:27:49 UTC, John Burton
wrote:
[...]
I therefore feel like I ought to not use assert and should
instead validate my assumptions with an if statement and a
throw or exit or something.
Yes,
Hello,
I've hit the following problem on this PR [0]:
The Windows 32bit build fails with the error: "more than 32767
symbols in object file" [1].
After taking a look in `win32.mak`, I've seen that we are
bundling multiple source files into a single object (which is the
issue here), instead
On Monday, 9 October 2017 at 13:38:18 UTC, lithium iodate wrote:
On Monday, 9 October 2017 at 00:24:02 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[…]
Thanks for the tip!
You might also want to use automatic word wrapping [0] for 120
chars.
Cheers,
Eduard
[0] -
On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 09:43:10 UTC, Anders S wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a middleware application that reads array of
data from a POSIX pipe and insert data into the db if any
position in the array has changed.
This is where my problem lays, in order not to duplicate data I
want to
On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 13:56:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 12:57:36 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 11:48:48 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu
wrote:
Hi guys,
I've just build druntime on Windows and we are displaying the
following deprecation message:
Hi guys,
I've just build druntime on Windows and we are displaying the
following deprecation message:
src\core\sys\windows\odbcinst.d(157): Deprecation: function
core.sys.windows.odbcinst.SQLInstallTranslatorW is deprecated.
I believe that we should also state with what should the
On Saturday, 20 May 2017 at 10:48:54 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Looks like you would want to use emplace [0] here.
public this(int n)
{
this._data = (cast(Foo*) calloc(n, Foo.sizeof))[0 .. n];
foreach(ref element; this._data)
{
On Friday, 14 October 2016 at 16:33:51 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
What I miss is s.th. to get the child Pids of a parent Pid.
Again I can use OS dependent functionality to retrieve the
processIDs of the children, but how to convert these processIDs
to Pids for usage with kill/wait functions?
On
On Friday, 9 December 2016 at 17:53:30 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
Hi!
This issue should be fixed since LDC 1:1.1.0-2, which Xenial
doesn't have.
Ideally, fetch a newer version from Debian or a PPA to solve
this issue.
Cheers,
Matthias
Hi!
Thank you for your answer.
For future
On Friday, 9 December 2016 at 17:34:35 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Friday, 9 December 2016 at 17:34:35 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
No thats all wrong, dmd a gdc could not use same include
directory that is not possible. GDC use
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/include/d/
Yes and no.. as you
Hello, everyone.
So I have found that installing ldc will break gdc.
The setup:
I have a VM running a 64bit Ubuntu 16.04, as you can see from the
output of uname -a:
Linux ubuntu-xenial 4.4.0-51-generic #72-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 24
18:29:54 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I have
44 matches
Mail list logo
