On 06/05/2015 07:31, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-05-06 01:38, Walter Bright wrote:
I haven't read the Tango source code, but the performance of it's xml
was supposedly because it did not use the GC, it used slices.
That's only true for the pull parser (not sure about the SAX parser).
The
On 05/05/2015 11:41, Mario =?UTF-8?B?S3LDtnBsaW4i?=
linkr...@github.com wrote:
Recently, I compared DOM parsers for an XML files of 100 MByte:
15.8 s tango.text.xml (SiegeLord/Tango-D2)
13.4 s ae.utils.xml (CyberShadow/ae)
8.5 s xml.etree (Python)
Either the Tango DOM parser is slow
