Re: Game development

2015-01-11 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 02:32:00 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Sun, 11 Jan 2015 01:45:25 + dajones via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote: *almost* :-) ah, so that was trolling? You keep taking the bait. sure. just be sure to keep it fun enough for me, so

Re: Game development

2015-01-10 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 10 January 2015 at 15:44:32 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:17:17 + dajones via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote: On Friday, 9 January 2015 at 06:17:28 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 22:27:53 +0100 Joseph

Re: Game development

2015-01-10 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 9 January 2015 at 06:17:28 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 22:27:53 +0100 Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d if he is intelligent enough, he will understand that nobody can talk for the whole community, so in the worst case he will ignore myself

Re: Game development

2015-01-10 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 00:44:00 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 23:13:28 + dajones via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote: On Saturday, 10 January 2015 at 20:59:20 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 16:03:22 +

Re: Game development

2015-01-10 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 10 January 2015 at 20:59:20 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 16:03:22 + dajones via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote: You are **proud** to draw the attention of nerdy middle aged men... ah, sure. it's always funny to see some old jerk

Re: Lost a new commercial user this week :(

2015-01-03 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 3 January 2015 at 02:22:32 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Fri, 02 Jan 2015 16:35:15 + dajones via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote: On Friday, 2 January 2015 at 13:46:00 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Fri, 02 Jan 2015 13:29:45 + dajones

Re: Lost a new commercial user this week :(

2015-01-03 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 2 January 2015 at 19:24:59 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote: Reading this thread, one gets the impression that Dconf 2015 is better off taking place in an octagon-shaped cage than a university lecture hall... Nerd cage fighting... now there's a reality TV show I would watch.

Re: Lost a new commercial user this week :(

2015-01-02 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 2 January 2015 at 10:44:44 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Fri, 02 Jan 2015 10:36:14 + dajones via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote: On Friday, 2 January 2015 at 01:17:32 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Thu, 01 Jan 2015 12:55:28 + Gary

Re: Lost a new commercial user this week :(

2015-01-02 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 2 January 2015 at 13:46:00 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Fri, 02 Jan 2015 13:29:45 + dajones via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote: Jeez I feel old. then you'd better don't know how old i am... There I was trying to excuse you for being full

Re: Lost a new commercial user this week :(

2015-01-02 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 2 January 2015 at 01:17:32 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Thu, 01 Jan 2015 12:55:28 + Gary Willoughby via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote: Just because you contribute to D it doesn't give you any authority to get angry at users or: that's really great.

Re: Lost a new commercial user this week :(

2015-01-01 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 1 January 2015 at 13:20:46 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote: On Thursday, 1 January 2015 at 12:55:29 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote: Just because you contribute to D it doesn't give you any authority to get angry at users or: He does not need any permission to get angry. Don't forget that

Re: Lost a new commercial user this week :(

2014-12-27 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d
docs... SortedRange!(Range, less) sort(alias less = a b, SwapStrategy ss = SwapStrategy.unstable, Range)(Range r) if ((ss == SwapStrategy.unstable (hasSwappableElements!Range || hasAssignableElements!Range) || ss != SwapStrategy.unstable hasAssignableElements!Range) isRandomAccessRange!Range

Re: string, char[], overloaded functions.

2014-11-02 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d-learn
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message news:xxnfghisussknbqzv...@forum.dlang.org... On Friday, 31 October 2014 at 23:59:54 UTC, dajones wrote: So shouldnt char[] implicity convert to string Nope, char[] casting to string is generally a bad thing that should be avoided

Re: string, char[], overloaded functions.

2014-11-02 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d-learn
Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote in message news:lccftxangprboitrt...@forum.dlang.org... On Friday, 31 October 2014 at 23:59:54 UTC, dajones wrote: is there a better way than doing... cast(string)(buf~hoo) to get it to pick the correct overload? text(buf,hoo) Thanks! chris

Re: string, char[], overloaded functions.

2014-11-02 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d-learn
Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote in message news:mailman.1363.1414801299.9932.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com... On Friday, October 31, 2014 23:58:43 dajones via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: Ok, void Foo(string name, string value); void Foo

string, char[], overloaded functions.

2014-10-31 Thread dajones via Digitalmars-d-learn
Ok, void Foo(string name, string value); void Foo(string name, int value); then... char[] buf = woo.dup; Foo(bar,woohoo); // works ok Foo(bar,buf~hoo); // fails, error says cant match params (string, int) So shouldnt char[] implicity convert to string, and hence match the (string,string)