Re: Moving back to .NET

2015-09-30 Thread learn via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 30 September 2015 at 17:12:37 UTC, Mengu wrote: On Wednesday, 30 September 2015 at 15:45:02 UTC, learn wrote: working as advertised libucrtd.lib is still sought and not found after another new release. you guys should get your shit together, otherwise more people that try D

Re: Moving back to .NET

2015-09-30 Thread learn via Digitalmars-d
working as advertised libucrtd.lib is still sought and not found after another new release. you guys should get your shit together, otherwise more people that try D will "Moving back to .NET" and not tell you about it. well i guess i leave now too, since i don't have the time and

new release doesn't work as advertised

2015-08-13 Thread learn via Digitalmars-d
trying to compile the minimal console application generated by visuald: Building Debug\ConsoleApp1.exe... LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libucrtd.lib' Building Debug\ConsoleApp1.exe failed! win10 - vs2015

vs2015 linker error

2015-08-13 Thread learn via Digitalmars-d-learn
trying to comile the minimal console application generated by visuald: Building Debug\ConsoleApp1.exe... LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libucrtd.lib' Building Debug\ConsoleApp1.exe failed!

complete win headers for 32/64 bit

2015-08-13 Thread learn via Digitalmars-d-learn
unfortunately i can't find a complete set of windows header files. maybe one should add a link for those headers if they exist - life is not linux or osx only.

Re: new release doesn't work as advertised

2015-08-13 Thread learn via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 10:44:06 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote: On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 10:40:08 UTC, learn wrote: trying to compile the minimal console application generated by visuald: Building Debug\ConsoleApp1.exe... LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libucrtd.lib'

Re: complete win headers for 32/64 bit

2015-08-13 Thread learn via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 17:04:54 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 16:28:15 UTC, learn wrote: I'm slowly working on getting them into the standard library. I'm probably one or two more weekends away from getting it to work (it is harder than I thought because the

Re: new release doesn't work as advertised

2015-08-13 Thread learn via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 16:44:09 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote: On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 16:30:59 UTC, learn wrote: On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 11:04:21 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote: It was posted there. It's a known issue. Currently no fix for VS2015. However it is being worked

Re: new release doesn't work as advertised

2015-08-13 Thread learn via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 11:04:21 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote: On 13/08/2015 10:44 p.m., Gary Willoughby wrote: On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 10:40:08 UTC, learn wrote: trying to compile the minimal console application generated by visuald: Building Debug\ConsoleApp1.exe... LINK :

Re: new release doesn't work as advertised

2015-08-13 Thread learn via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 18:32:31 UTC, kinke wrote: First of all, the RTM has been released about 3 weeks ago, so how come you expect an entirely community-driven compiler to support it within such a short time frame? Especially as Win64 is not considered a primary target. Secondly,

Re: new release doesn't work as advertised

2015-08-13 Thread learn via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 21:04:53 UTC, bachmeier wrote: My comment was about the limited resources of this community. If there are false statements about VS 2015 support, then they should be corrected. And if you feel that VS 2015 support is a must, then it is entirely reasonable to not

Re: new release doesn't work as advertised

2015-08-13 Thread learn via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 22:15:47 UTC, rumbu wrote: On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 20:30:35 UTC, learn wrote: btw - i still want to use D in VS 2015 only. You can use D in VS 2015 for building standard 32 bit executables. Trying to build mscoff executables (32 or 64 bit) will lead to

Re: new release doesn't work as advertised

2015-08-13 Thread learn via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 20:13:59 UTC, bachmeier wrote: D is not for everyone. This user needs to be using a commercial compiler with commercial tools, and a special support contract. You can complain about how things should be, but this is reality. Unless you are willing to dump a few