Re: [OT] Re: Introducing Nullable Reference Types in C#. Is there hope for D, too?

2017-11-24 Thread Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 25 November 2017 at 01:23:03 UTC, codephantom wrote: And thankyou. This a much more constructive option for users that disagree with something I say. i.e. Now they can just hide me, instead of attacking me. Dont worry, both Walter and Andrei have done far worse in these fora

Re: [OT] Re: Introducing Nullable Reference Types in C#. Is there hope for D, too?

2017-11-24 Thread codephantom via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 25 November 2017 at 01:00:43 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: Given that it can be accomplished on the client side, it is actually easy to not display posts from specific users. Civility returns. Horray... And thankyou. This a much more constructive option for users that disagree with

Re: [OT] Re: Introducing Nullable Reference Types in C#. Is there hope for D, too?

2017-11-24 Thread Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
On 24.11.2017 13:10, Nick Treleaven wrote: On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 06:35:17 UTC, codephantom wrote: ... not being able to edit posts. ... It's not as much of a problem as not being able to hide all posts by a user ... Given that it can be accomplished on the client side, it is

Re: [OT] Re: Introducing Nullable Reference Types in C#. Is there hope for D, too?

2017-11-24 Thread codephantom via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 12:10:28 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote: On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 06:35:17 UTC, codephantom wrote: I love not being able to edit posts. It's so convenient. It's not as much of a problem as not being able to hide all posts by a user who repeats arguments,

Re: [OT] Re: Introducing Nullable Reference Types in C#. Is there hope for D, too?

2017-11-24 Thread codephantom via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 23:36:08 UTC, Bobb wrote: On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 20:29:23 UTC, codephantom wrote: On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 12:10:28 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote: On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 06:35:17 UTC, codephantom wrote: I love not being able to edit posts.

Re: [OT] Re: Introducing Nullable Reference Types in C#. Is there hope for D, too?

2017-11-24 Thread codephantom via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 23:55:58 UTC, lobo wrote: On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 23:36:08 UTC, Bobb wrote: On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 20:29:23 UTC, codephantom wrote: On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 12:10:28 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote: On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 06:35:17 UTC,

Re: [OT] Re: Introducing Nullable Reference Types in C#. Is there hope for D, too?

2017-11-24 Thread codephantom via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 23:01:04 UTC, Meta wrote: On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 20:29:23 UTC, codephantom wrote: On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 12:10:28 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote: On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 06:35:17 UTC, codephantom wrote: I love not being able to edit posts.

Re: [OT] Re: Introducing Nullable Reference Types in C#. Is there hope for D, too?

2017-11-24 Thread lobo via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 23:36:08 UTC, Bobb wrote: On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 20:29:23 UTC, codephantom wrote: On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 12:10:28 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote: On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 06:35:17 UTC, codephantom wrote: I love not being able to edit posts.

Re: [OT] Re: Introducing Nullable Reference Types in C#. Is there hope for D, too?

2017-11-24 Thread Bobb via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 20:29:23 UTC, codephantom wrote: On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 12:10:28 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote: On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 06:35:17 UTC, codephantom wrote: I love not being able to edit posts. It's so convenient. It's not as much of a problem as not

Re: [OT] Re: Introducing Nullable Reference Types in C#. Is there hope for D, too?

2017-11-24 Thread Meta via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 20:29:23 UTC, codephantom wrote: On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 12:10:28 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote: On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 06:35:17 UTC, codephantom wrote: I love not being able to edit posts. It's so convenient. It's not as much of a problem as not

Re: [OT] Re: Introducing Nullable Reference Types in C#. Is there hope for D, too?

2017-11-24 Thread codephantom via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 12:10:28 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote: On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 06:35:17 UTC, codephantom wrote: I love not being able to edit posts. It's so convenient. It's not as much of a problem as not being able to hide all posts by a user who repeats arguments,

Re: [OT] Re: Introducing Nullable Reference Types in C#. Is there hope for D, too?

2017-11-24 Thread codephantom via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 12:10:28 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote: On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 06:35:17 UTC, codephantom wrote: I love not being able to edit posts. It's so convenient. It's not as much of a problem as not being able to hide all posts by a user who repeats arguments,

[OT] Re: Introducing Nullable Reference Types in C#. Is there hope for D, too?

2017-11-24 Thread Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 06:35:17 UTC, codephantom wrote: I love not being able to edit posts. It's so convenient. It's not as much of a problem as not being able to hide all posts by a user who repeats arguments, derails the conversation onto irrelevant side discussions and judges