On Saturday, 23 January 2016 at 18:58:21 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 01/23/16 02:11, ronaldmc via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Linux development works because Linus is right often enough. It
really is that simple.
But I also think Linus weighs different solutions (and
implementations and
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 at 00:30:17 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
got this strange notion from. Walter is the one who invented
this language, and he has been generous enough to let the rest
of us participate in its development.
Yes, I agree with this. If anything, bringing too much democracy
On 22.01.2016 00:46, anonymous wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/eJaKFtx.png
[...]
For dlang.org, I'd choose the version with the wide background arc. I
think it looks nice on the menu bar, and it puts a little more emphasis
there than just the core shape. But just the core shape looks fine, too.
I
On Sunday, 24 January 2016 at 13:03:36 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Meritocracy is not a horrible concept though.
Err, type. I meant to say that is a horrible concept. It is
better than seniority, but makes no sense outside a hierarchical
power structure IMO.
On 2016-01-22 00:46, anonymous wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/eJaKFtx.png
The first one is the current logo. The last one shows just the core
shape (D + moons), of course.
I vote the last one as the official out of context logo. I vote the
third one for the web site.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 at 01:23:20 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
This is not the governance of a country. If you don't like the
way the decisions are being made, you always have the freedom
to take the source code (except for the proprietary backend),
fork it, and build your own community.
I always wanted it to be a gif so the planet would appear to be subtly rotating
and the edge of Deimos might twinkle slightly :-)
On 01/23/16 02:11, ronaldmc via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
> What happens if a technical feature is vetoed by someone is charge even if it
> has merit?
Every wrong decision affects the project negatively.
> Linux Foundation has a board members to approve or not new features or
> changes, and
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 at 08:25:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I always wanted it to be a gif so the planet would appear to be
subtly rotating and the edge of Deimos might twinkle slightly
:-)
If it was meant to be a git then it makes more sense why it was
as it is originally (but
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 20:28:57 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 22.01.2016 20:53, ronaldmc wrote:
I don't want to start a war, but this isn't community? I mean
aren't we
trying to make things better, because the way you said it
seems like a
dictatorship.
It's dictatorship insofar as Walter
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 at 01:23:20 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
...
And besides, calling something a "dictatorship" is again
confusing the development of a programming language with
running a government. I still fail to see the connection
between the two.
Because maybe you don't read too
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 at 15:41:43 UTC, ronaldmc wrote:
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 at 01:23:20 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
Because maybe you don't read too much (outside programming),
you can easily find the term being used on open source. i.e:
On 1/23/2016 11:47 AM, karabuta wrote:
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 at 08:25:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I always wanted it to be a gif so the planet would appear to be subtly
rotating and the edge of Deimos might twinkle slightly :-)
If it was meant to be a git then it makes more sense why
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 00:04:33 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:49:39 UTC, cym13 wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:46:26 UTC, anonymous wrote:
The logo is repeatedly being called out as a weak spot of the
D brand. But so far Walter has been adamant about
On 22.01.2016 20:53, ronaldmc wrote:
I don't want to start a war, but this isn't community? I mean aren't we
trying to make things better, because the way you said it seems like a
dictatorship.
It's dictatorship insofar as Walter and Andrei have veto power. If they
don't want something in, it
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 20:28:57 UTC, anonymous wrote:
And of all things, the logo wouldn't be a good reason to divide
over, in my opinion.
No, of course not. But I've saw something like this with features
to be added on the language, like for example 300+ discussion
thread with
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 20:28:57 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 22.01.2016 20:53, ronaldmc wrote:
I don't want to start a war, but this isn't community? I mean
aren't we
trying to make things better, because the way you said it
seems like a
dictatorship.
It's dictatorship insofar as Walter
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 19:53:32 UTC, ronaldmc wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:46:26 UTC, anonymous wrote:
The logo is repeatedly being called out as a weak spot of the
D brand. But so far Walter has been adamant about keeping it
the way it is.
I don't want to start a war,
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 20:28:57 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 22.01.2016 20:53, ronaldmc wrote:
I don't want to start a war, but this isn't community? I mean
aren't we
trying to make things better, because the way you said it
seems like a
dictatorship.
It's dictatorship insofar as Walter
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:46:26 UTC, anonymous wrote:
The logo is repeatedly being called out as a weak spot of the D
brand. But so far Walter has been adamant about keeping it the
way it is.
I don't want to start a war, but this isn't community? I mean
aren't we trying to make
On 22.01.2016 16:48, WebFreak001 wrote:
(First I have fixed these weird curves on the D's bottom left and top
left corner.)
What's weird about them? As far as I see, you made the corners more
pointed, though it's hard to tell at that size. I'm not sure if that's
an improvement.
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 19:00:41 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 22.01.2016 16:48, WebFreak001 wrote:
(First I have fixed these weird curves on the D's bottom left
and top
left corner.)
What's weird about them? As far as I see, you made the corners
more pointed, though it's hard to tell at
On 22.01.2016 20:08, WebFreak001 wrote:
Original: https://i.imgur.com/6M1Eoy2.png
Fixed: https://i.imgur.com/uLuUgJY.png
:D
Yeah, uhm, that's totally an improvement, of course.
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:46:26 UTC, anonymous wrote:
The logo is repeatedly being called out as a weak spot of the D
brand. But so far Walter has been adamant about keeping it the
way it is.
I certainly agree the logo is weak, to me the planets look more
like a bad lens flare
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:46:26 UTC, anonymous wrote:
For dlang.org, I'd choose the version with the wide background
arc. I think it looks nice on the menu bar, and it puts a
little more emphasis there than just the core shape. But just
the core shape looks fine, too.
For me its a
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 09:26:12PM +, ronaldmc via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 20:28:57 UTC, anonymous wrote:
> >And of all things, the logo wouldn't be a good reason to divide over,
> >in my opinion.
>
> No, of course not. But I've saw something like this with
On 22.01.2016 20:08, WebFreak001 wrote:
Original: https://i.imgur.com/6M1Eoy2.png
Fixed: https://i.imgur.com/uLuUgJY.png
Can you post the fixed SVG code, so that I can update my stuff?
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 15:48:04 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 15:25:25 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Here's the SVG. Go crazy.
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/421e80748f1c885f7620
(First I have fixed these weird curves on the D's bottom left
and top left corner.)
For the website, definitely number 3. As a standalone version,
the fourth one can be used. Or if we insist on the "horizon" arc,
maybe a version can be made that fades out the arc much closer to
the "D", so that the entire logo fits into a nearly-square
rectangle.
On 22.01.2016 15:44, WebFreak001 wrote:
However I dont have an SVG for that and I basically just used the logo
from the imgur screenshot, cut of a rounded rectangle (5px border
radius) and added a simple box shadow (0px 1px 3px rgba(0,0,0,0.3))
Here's the SVG. Go crazy.
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:46:26 UTC, anonymous wrote:
The logo is repeatedly being called out as a weak spot of the D
brand. But so far Walter has been adamant about keeping it the
way it is.
I agree with him that changing it to a completely different one
would probably not be a
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 15:25:25 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Here's the SVG. Go crazy.
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/421e80748f1c885f7620
(First I have fixed these weird curves on the D's bottom left and
top left corner.)
OK I have cropped it now and also tried to add a slight box
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 14:26:21 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
For the website, definitely number 3. As a standalone version,
the fourth one can be used. Or if we insist on the "horizon"
arc, maybe a version can be made that fades out the arc much
closer to the "D", so that the entire logo
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 00:04:33 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:49:39 UTC, cym13 wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:46:26 UTC, anonymous wrote:
The logo is repeatedly being called out as a weak spot of the
D brand. But so far Walter has been adamant about
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 at 00:30:17 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
... What ought to rule in a programming language is technical
merit, not popularity.
What happens if a technical feature is vetoed by someone is
charge even if it has merit?
And you're comparing Apples vs Oranges with the rest
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 01:11:20AM +, ronaldmc via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Saturday, 23 January 2016 at 00:30:17 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >... What ought to rule in a programming language is technical merit,
> >not popularity.
>
> What happens if a technical feature is vetoed by someone is
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:46:26 UTC, anonymous wrote:
The logo is repeatedly being called out as a weak spot of the D
brand. But so far Walter has been adamant about keeping it the
way it is.
[...]
I love the third one from the top, it is close enough from the
official logo to
The logo is repeatedly being called out as a weak spot of the D brand.
But so far Walter has been adamant about keeping it the way it is.
I agree with him that changing it to a completely different one would
probably not be a good move, losing whatever brand recognition we have.
But I think
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:49:39 UTC, cym13 wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:46:26 UTC, anonymous wrote:
The logo is repeatedly being called out as a weak spot of the
D brand. But so far Walter has been adamant about keeping it
the way it is.
[...]
I love the third one
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:46:26 UTC, anonymous wrote:
...
For me the last one. It's simple and clear. I really don't think
the currently Logo is good for the new layout, I really dislike
the black border.
I don't know what the big deal with changing the Logo, since any
big
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 23:46:26 UTC, anonymous wrote:
...
bottom two are the best.
mixing matte and glossy is just *ugly*
41 matches
Mail list logo
