On 2017-10-27 11:06, bauss wrote:
Ahh yeah, that's true. I wasn't thinking that far
I think head const [1] is what he's looking for. Similar to "final" in Java.
[1] https://dlang.org/const-faq.html#head-const
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Friday, 27 October 2017 at 06:49:47 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-10-27 01:04, bauss wrote:
The first example would not equal the second, because you
could set bar from anywhere within the module.
Immutable will already do your behavior.
class Foo
{
immutable string bar;
On 2017-10-27 01:04, bauss wrote:
The first example would not equal the second, because you could set bar
from anywhere within the module.
Immutable will already do your behavior.
class Foo
{
immutable string bar;
this(string baz)
{
bar = baz;
}
}
That only
On Thursday, 26 October 2017 at 21:19:28 UTC, LunaticWare wrote:
Hello everyone i am new to the D community and i really enjoy
programming in D,
i haven't done anything significant so far. but being a very
lazy person,
when writing a bit of code i noticed that maybe for such a
simple
thing we
On 10/26/2017 02:19 PM, LunaticWare wrote:
> i don't know if this is the correct way to suggest enhancement to D,
Improvement proposals are handled through DIPs here:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs
> so maybe we could add syntactic sugar for "readonly" attributes.
There is the following
On Thursday, 26 October 2017 at 21:19:28 UTC, LunaticWare wrote:
[snip]
You can use string mixins.
template GenGetterSetter(string Type, string Name)
{
const char[] GenGetterSetter = "private " ~ Type ~ " " ~
Name ~ "_;\n" ~
"this(" ~ Type ~ "
Hello everyone i am new to the D community and i really enjoy
programming in D,
i haven't done anything significant so far. but being a very lazy
person,
when writing a bit of code i noticed that maybe for such a simple
thing we could have a shorter syntax.
i don't know if this is the correct
