On 17/12/2014 17:19, Kingsley wrote:
Secondly - how active it the development of DDT - does it keep up with
the D2 releases.
Yes, it keeps up, and I plan to keep that up for the foreseeable future.
(Since language grammar changes are fairly uncommon, and easy to
implement when they happen).
On 21/12/2014 00:34, Kingsley wrote:
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 02:53:02 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 19/12/2014 10:19 a.m., Kingsley wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 21:05:05 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Thanks very much. I do have a couple of questions about DDT in
On 22/12/2014 11:44, Kingsley wrote:
Hi Bruno - would be easy to return the list of tokens included for each
node in the DeeParser?
You can create an utility method that does that, if you have a
DeeParseResult.
The DeeParseResult has a 'tokenList' member, ordered by the source
range. With
On Sunday, 21 December 2014 at 00:34:06 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 02:53:02 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 19/12/2014 10:19 a.m., Kingsley wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 21:05:05 UTC, Kingsley
wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Thanks very much. I do have a couple of
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 02:53:02 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 19/12/2014 10:19 a.m., Kingsley wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 21:05:05 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Thanks very much. I do have a couple of questions about DDT
in
relation to my plugin.
Firstly - I'm not
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 21:05:05 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Thanks very much. I do have a couple of questions about DDT in
relation to my plugin.
Firstly - I'm not too familiar with parsing/lexing but at the
moment the Psi Structure I have implemented that comes from
the
On 19/12/2014 10:19 a.m., Kingsley wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 21:05:05 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Thanks very much. I do have a couple of questions about DDT in
relation to my plugin.
Firstly - I'm not too familiar with parsing/lexing but at the moment
the Psi Structure I
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 03:03:59 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 17/12/2014 1:35 p.m., Kingsley wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 23:25:02 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:40:20 UTC, landaire wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:35:16 UTC, Jeremy Powers
On 17/12/2014 09:13, Kingsley wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 03:03:59 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 17/12/2014 1:35 p.m., Kingsley wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 23:25:02 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:40:20 UTC, landaire wrote:
On Monday, 27
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 12:31:32 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 17/12/2014 09:13, Kingsley wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 03:03:59 UTC, Rikki
Cattermole wrote:
On 17/12/2014 1:35 p.m., Kingsley wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 23:25:02 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
On Monday,
Hi Bruno,
Thanks very much. I do have a couple of questions about DDT in
relation to my plugin.
Firstly - I'm not too familiar with parsing/lexing but at the
moment the Psi Structure I have implemented that comes from the
DDT parser/lexer is not in any kind of hierarchy. All the
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:40:20 UTC, landaire wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:35:16 UTC, Jeremy Powers via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
This looks eerily familiar...
I took a stab at an Intellij plugin a long time ago, and
happened to pick
the same name:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 23:25:02 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:40:20 UTC, landaire wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:35:16 UTC, Jeremy Powers via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
This looks eerily familiar...
I took a stab at an Intellij plugin a long time ago, and
On 17/12/2014 1:35 p.m., Kingsley wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 23:25:02 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:40:20 UTC, landaire wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:35:16 UTC, Jeremy Powers via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
This looks eerily familiar...
I took a stab at
On 31/10/2014 12:02, Daniel Kozák via Digitalmars-d wrote:
You can write intellij idea plugins with JDK 7 or even JDK 8, but that
plugins will only work with IDEA running on same version of JDK. You
must use same version for IDEA SDK and for IDEA itself. Currently
IDEA and all plugins are
On 31/10/2014 12:16, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 1/11/2014 12:35 a.m., Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 27/10/2014 22:35, Jeremy Powers via Digitalmars-d wrote:
An interesting path to take for an intellij plugin would be to use his
DCD/libdparse for all the heavy lifting, with the plugin just farming
On 8/11/2014 4:16 a.m., Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 31/10/2014 12:16, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 1/11/2014 12:35 a.m., Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 27/10/2014 22:35, Jeremy Powers via Digitalmars-d wrote:
An interesting path to take for an intellij plugin would be to use his
DCD/libdparse for all
On 27/10/2014 22:53, landaire wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:43:55 UTC, Jeremy Powers via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
From my mucking about before, I think you'll get more mileage from using
libdparse directly than trying to (re)implement a parser for the plugin.
For one, you save yourself
On 27/10/2014 22:35, Jeremy Powers via Digitalmars-d wrote:
An interesting path to take for an intellij plugin would be to use his
DCD/libdparse for all the heavy lifting, with the plugin just farming
out the work to external daemon process(es). That would avoid having
yet another lexer/parser
On 27/10/2014 22:06, landaire wrote:
I'm trying to make a plugin for IntelliJ IDEA to support D
(https://github.com/landaire/intelliD is what I have now utilizing DDT's
lexer) but a lot of what's required to add advanced features like code
folding, code completion, etc. is generally
V Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:41:58 +
Bruno Medeiros via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com napsáno:
On 27/10/2014 22:06, landaire wrote:
I'm trying to make a plugin for IntelliJ IDEA to support D
(https://github.com/landaire/intelliD is what I have now utilizing
DDT's lexer) but a lot
On 1/11/2014 12:35 a.m., Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 27/10/2014 22:35, Jeremy Powers via Digitalmars-d wrote:
An interesting path to take for an intellij plugin would be to use his
DCD/libdparse for all the heavy lifting, with the plugin just farming
out the work to external daemon process(es).
There have been similar questions asked on this forum before
(most recent one in June with no result:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/cafmgiz8fyv2a+scqpqteyesfsybznfy--nsxl5rqnowwna4...@mail.gmail.com?page=1),
but I was curious if anyone happens to have a BNF grammar for D
laying around. I've
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:06:28 UTC, landaire wrote:
I've searched all over and can't seem to find anything.
There are links to my projects in that thread.
https://github.com/Hackerpilot/libdparse should help. The doc
comments for the parser tell you the grammar that they implement.
(most recent
one in June with no result: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/CAFMGiz8Fyv2A+
scqpqteyesfsybznfy--nsxl5rqnowwna4...@mail.gmail.com?page=1), but I was
curious if anyone happens to have a BNF grammar for D laying around. I've
searched all over and can't seem to find anything.
I'm trying
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:30:15 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:06:28 UTC, landaire wrote:
I've searched all over and can't seem to find anything.
There are links to my projects in that thread.
Sorry, what I meant was I couldn't find a BNF grammar :)
I must
There are links to my projects in that thread. https://github.com/
Hackerpilot/libdparse should help. The doc comments for the parser tell
you the grammar that they implement. (The DGrammar project is based on
these ddoc comments. This reminds me that I need to update it.) The
official
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:35:16 UTC, Jeremy Powers via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
This looks eerily familiar...
I took a stab at an Intellij plugin a long time ago, and
happened to pick
the same name:
https://github.com/elendel-/intelliD
Been meaning to pick back up again, but haven't had
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:43:55 UTC, Jeremy Powers via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
From my mucking about before, I think you'll get more mileage
from using
libdparse directly than trying to (re)implement a parser for
the plugin.
For one, you save yourself all the pain of fixing weird edge
Glad to see you turned up here.
I'm usually lurking around...
I agree, but integrating something external with IntelliJ's platform seems
like kind of a PITA. It looks like a lot of stuff makes heavy use of PSI
trees (see: https://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/IDEADEV/
if anyone happens to have a BNF grammar for D
laying around. I've searched all over and can't seem to find
anything.
I'm trying to make a plugin for IntelliJ IDEA to support D
(https://github.com/landaire/intelliD is what I have now
utilizing DDT's lexer) but a lot of what's required to add
advanced
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 23:17:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:06:28 UTC, landaire wrote:
I've also been playing with getting a Intellij IDEA plugin up
but it utilises DScanner. The only issue I'm having right now
is for some reason its adding two elements
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 23:17:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Not to mention getting dscanner to output the correct line
number/index ext. Fun times.
If the lexer is giving the wrong line numbers for tokens, I want
to know about it. Do you have a file that reproduces this issue?
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 23:50:22 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 23:17:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Not to mention getting dscanner to output the correct line
number/index ext. Fun times.
If the lexer is giving the wrong line numbers for tokens, I
want to know
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 23:27:20 UTC, landaire wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 23:17:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:06:28 UTC, landaire wrote:
I've also been playing with getting a Intellij IDEA plugin up
but it utilises DScanner. The only issue I'm
http://www.dsource.org/projects/visuald/wiki/GrammarComparison
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I'm pretty sure a correct D grammar is impossible in LALR(1)
a^n b^n c^n is not LALR(1). But a^n b^n c^m is---if n and m are not
dependent.
I.e.: without specifying the restrictions for the allowed semantic
checks there is no sureness for impossibilities.
-manfred
On 10/13/2012 8:02 AM, Mehrdad wrote:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/visuald/wiki/GrammarComparison
I haven't tried it for some time, but you can generate the text files
from the current documentation with the script in
http://www.dsource.org/projects/visuald/browser/grammar
Hi,
cedet is a collection of emacs dev tools. I understand that it should be
relatively easy to enhance the emacs support of D if one just provides cedet
with a BNF grammar in a Bison like format, I cite:
You should choose to use the Semantic lexer/grammer format for your language
if it has
Hi,
I can give you three options to choose from.
There's the official grammar (don't know what the form is called):
http://dlang.org/declaration.html
A Parser Expression Grammar (PEG):
https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/Pegged/blob/master/pegged/examples/dparser.d
The source code comments in
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 15:11 +0200, Aziz K. wrote:
Hi,
I can give you three options to choose from.
There's the official grammar (don't know what the form is called):
http://dlang.org/declaration.html
A Parser Expression Grammar (PEG):
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 14:41:12 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 15:11 +0200, Aziz K. wrote:
Hi,
I can give you three options to choose from.
There's the official grammar (don't know what the form is
called):
http://dlang.org/declaration.html
A Parser Expression
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:59 +0200, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
My grammar knowledge is a bit rusty, but isn't EBNF only possible
for LR(K) languages?
Mentioning EBNF turns out to be a red herring. Indeed mention of BNF is
a red herring also. What is actually needed is a Wisent grammar file.
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:16:10 +0100
Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:59 +0200, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
My grammar knowledge is a bit rusty, but isn't EBNF only possible
for LR(K) languages?
Mentioning EBNF turns out to be a red herring. Indeed mention
44 matches
Mail list logo
