[Issue 20338] dmd, phobos, and druntime build systems should be updated

2022-12-17 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20338 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P4 --

[Issue 20338] dmd, phobos, and druntime build systems should be updated

2019-10-30 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
for dmd and phobos on the assumption that the phobos build/test system has the same issue. CMake provides a powerful environment (for example, dependencies between tests) to solve such parallel build issues. Also, to expand on my remarks about different build systems for Posix (where you currently

[Issue 20338] dmd, phobos, and druntime build systems should be updated

2019-10-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
|build systems should be |build systems should be |modernized |updated --- Comment #1 from alan.w.irwin1...@gmail.com --- I have recently cleaned, rebuilt, reinstalled, and tested dmd, phobos, and the druntime components needed by phobos

[Issue 20338] New: dmd, phobos, and druntime build systems should be modernized

2019-10-29 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20338 Issue ID: 20338 Summary: dmd, phobos, and druntime build systems should be modernized Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW

Re: What is the current status of D build systems?

2015-07-31 Thread lobo via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 23:59:07 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote: On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 22:40:25 UTC, Trent Forkert wrote: On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 00:13:42 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote: [...] Oh hey, that's me! [...] I've got a handful of work-in-progress changes I've yet to push publicly,

Re: What is the current status of D build systems?

2015-07-31 Thread Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 00:13:42 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote: Hi, I'm working on a project that mixes both C and D code, and does code generation as well. [...] I'll get that bug fixed soon. I planned on doing it today but ran out of time. Atila

Re: What is the current status of D build systems?

2015-07-31 Thread Steven Dwy via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 00:13:42 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote: I have come across cmake-d and a modified version of cmake (https://github.com/trentforkert/cmake). I haven't tested them yet, because neither of them is updated recently, and I don't know if I should invest time in them. I'm not

Re: What is the current status of D build systems?

2015-07-31 Thread Trent Forkert via Digitalmars-d
in them. I've got a handful of work-in-progress changes I've yet to push publicly, and even more I've yet to commit. (Yes, I have weird work habits.) So I want to know what is the current status of those build systems? I'm still around, and I fix bugs when they get in my way or someone

Re: What is the current status of D build systems?

2015-07-31 Thread Manu via Digitalmars-d
On 31 July 2015 at 13:20, Yuxuan Shui via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote: On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 02:00:41 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 00:13:42 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote: are there any other build systems I should look into? Premake [1] supports

Re: What is the current status of D build systems?

2015-07-31 Thread Yuxuan Shui via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 22:40:25 UTC, Trent Forkert wrote: On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 00:13:42 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote: [...] Oh hey, that's me! [...] I've got a handful of work-in-progress changes I've yet to push publicly, and even more I've yet to commit. (Yes, I have weird work

What is the current status of D build systems?

2015-07-30 Thread Yuxuan Shui via Digitalmars-d
, and I don't know if I should invest time in them. So I want to know what is the current status of those build systems? Are they abandoned or still actively developed? And are there any other build systems I should look into? Thanks. --- Regards, Yuxuan Shui

Re: What is the current status of D build systems?

2015-07-30 Thread Yuxuan Shui via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 02:00:41 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 00:13:42 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote: are there any other build systems I should look into? Premake [1] supports mixing languages in the same build script. It's not a build tool itself, but can generate

Re: What is the current status of D build systems?

2015-07-30 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 00:13:42 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote: are there any other build systems I should look into? Premake [1] supports mixing languages in the same build script. It's not a build tool itself, but can generate makefiles and IDE projects. Manu [2] maintains extensions for D

Re: Build Systems

2015-02-04 Thread Fool via Digitalmars-d
I had a look at different build systems, recently. Tup certainly has some progressive ideas. What I don't like is that it patronizes its users. I don't believe that tracking all file reads and writes is always a good choice. It might be a good default, though. Some other interesting build

Build systems and D

2011-12-10 Thread Russel Winder
I wonder if we should get a small number of projects and do CMake, premake, SCons, Waf, and other builds for them so that direct comparisons can be made and people can comment on comparing apples with apples? (Even though there may be oranges in there as well ;-) -- Russel.

Re: Build systems with D support [was: Response files]

2009-03-24 Thread Nick Sabalausky
Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com wrote in message news:20090323192000.ga23...@burns.springfield.home... Leandro Lucarella, el 23 de marzo a las 13:31 me escribiste: And guess what? It even support D =) http://waf.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/demos/d/ It looks like AAP support D too =)

Build systems with D support [was: Response files]

2009-03-23 Thread Leandro Lucarella
Leandro Lucarella, el 23 de marzo a las 13:31 me escribiste: And guess what? It even support D =) http://waf.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/demos/d/ It looks like AAP support D too =) http://www.a-a-p.org/exec/ref-modules.html#id2686506 It's nice new build system support D. It seems that the

Re: Build systems with D support [was: Response files]

2009-03-23 Thread Walter Bright
Leandro Lucarella wrote: Leandro Lucarella, el 23 de marzo a las 13:31 me escribiste: And guess what? It even support D =) http://waf.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/demos/d/ It looks like AAP support D too =) http://www.a-a-p.org/exec/ref-modules.html#id2686506 It's nice new build system support

Re: Build systems with D support [was: Response files]

2009-03-23 Thread Jarrett Billingsley
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote: Leandro Lucarella wrote: Leandro Lucarella, el 23 de marzo a las 13:31 me escribiste: And guess what? It even support D =) http://waf.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/demos/d/ It looks like AAP support D too =)

Re: Build systems with D support [was: Response files]

2009-03-23 Thread Walter Bright
Jarrett Billingsley wrote: For what it's worth, most of the D wiki is incredibly out-of-date too. I just don't think there's enough manpower to go around to maintain it. Anyone can update it!

Re: Build systems with D support [was: Response files]

2009-03-23 Thread Jarrett Billingsley
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote: Jarrett Billingsley wrote: For what it's worth, most of the D wiki is incredibly out-of-date too.  I just don't think there's enough manpower to go around to maintain it. Anyone can update it! You noticed my

Re: Build systems with D support [was: Response files]

2009-03-23 Thread Walter Bright
Jarrett Billingsley wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote: Jarrett Billingsley wrote: For what it's worth, most of the D wiki is incredibly out-of-date too. I just don't think there's enough manpower to go around to maintain it. Anyone can