On 4/25/14, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Recently, I observed a conversation happening on the github pull request
system.
Another case of hijacking is the std.conv.text function. I've seen two
people so far that have accidentally called the global
On Friday, 25 April 2014 at 07:52:20 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Another case of hijacking is the std.conv.text function. I've
seen two
people so far that have accidentally called the global text
function
by mistake, e.g.:
Make that three. The ability to call non-@property
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:58:51 -0400, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
If it doesn't work to override a free function with a member
function, I honestly don't see much point to UFCS. The whole idea
behind it is to make it so that you don't have to care
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 03:52:09 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 4/25/14, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Recently, I observed a conversation happening on the github pull request
system.
Another case of
On Friday, 25 April 2014 at 12:21:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I think this really comes down to a poorly named function.
textOf, toText, textify even, are better names that wouldn't
cause this problem.
-Steve
Well, in this case, yes, because it's a noun. For all functions
that are
Recently, I observed a conversation happening on the github pull request
system.
In phobos, we have the notion of output ranges. One is allowed to output
to an output range by calling the function 'put'.
Here is the implementation of put:
void put(R, E)(ref R r, E e)
{
static
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:21:32 -0400
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
Recently, I observed a conversation happening on the github pull
request system.
In phobos, we have the notion of output ranges. One is allowed to
output to an output range by
On Friday, 25 April 2014 at 02:21:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
A relevant bug report (where I actually advocate for adding
more of this horrible behavior):
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12583
-Steve
See also: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9074
Appender!string x;