Congratulations!!!
Am 21.02.2015 um 15:02 schrieb Daniel Murphy:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first time, an
unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build druntime and
phobos and pass all the test suites.
Hopefully in the next
On 2/22/15, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
2 years ago, I had this discussion with Andrej
Nope. Andrei. :p
On Saturday, 21 February 2015 at 16:17:03 UTC, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
almost works now, except I recently put all the source into a
'ddmd' package and now rdmd can't find it as it's not in a
'ddmd' directory.
-I.. should fix that, I think
Benjamin Thaut:
Are there any performance comparisons? E.g. how long das DDMD
take to compile phobos vs regular DMD?
Yes, there are several performance comparisons I'm curious about,
like binary size, compilation speed, compilation speed of the
compiler, max memory to compile Phobos without
On 2/21/15 7:09 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Jeremy DeHaan wrote in message
news:wsowtbjrocqkdpnhf...@forum.dlang.org...
This is awesome! Does that mean we're going to see a DDMD release for
2.067?
It's possible if someone wants to update the release scripts and
coordinate with Martin.
I
On 2/22/15 7:16 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Benjamin Thaut wrote in message news:mcco2v$1bpg$1...@digitalmars.com...
Are there any performance comparisons? E.g. how long das DDMD take to
compile phobos vs regular DMD?
Some numbers can easily be gathered from looking at the autotester times.
Benjamin Thaut wrote in message news:mcco2v$1bpg$1...@digitalmars.com...
Are there any performance comparisons? E.g. how long das DDMD take to
compile phobos vs regular DMD?
Some numbers can easily be gathered from looking at the autotester times.
On Sunday, 22 February 2015 at 14:18:31 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Benjamin Thaut:
Are there any performance comparisons? E.g. how long das DDMD
take to compile phobos vs regular DMD?
Yes, there are several performance comparisons I'm curious
about, like binary size, compilation speed,
Vladimir Panteleev wrote in message
news:ueqnmyfvntkjybclh...@forum.dlang.org...
-I.. should fix that, I think
It would if the package was called 'src'.
On Sunday, 22 February 2015 at 03:32:38 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
The next step is probably to get
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3970 in, and
force everybody to get their host D toolchain configured.
I'm all for doing that once the 2.067-related dust has settled
down.
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message
news:mccu03$1ger$1...@digitalmars.com...
I think we should target 2.068 at the earliest. -- Andrei
Oh yeah, certainly not as the default. But we could provide an experimental
zip that lets people try out ddmd with their projects.
Joakim wrote in message news:tyyiuqdewulqpikhi...@forum.dlang.org...
I hope it goes through more quickly from now on.
Haha we'll see.
Second, this would be a great opportunity to benchmark ddmd with some of
the comparisons bearophile asked for and write something up with the
results. It
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 02:09:49 +1100, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote in message
news:ueqnmyfvntkjybclh...@forum.dlang.org...
-I.. should fix that, I think
It would if the package was called 'src'.
isn't it time to introduce a new cli flag: directory alias? something
like
Suliman wrote in message news:daeyakftojagfwtes...@forum.dlang.org...
Does it's mean that next release of DMD would have name DDMD?
Or it would be two branch at first time DMD and DDMD?
Or DDMD would be renamed to DMD?
Currently they're in two different branches, soon work will start to move
Jeremy DeHaan wrote in message
news:wsowtbjrocqkdpnhf...@forum.dlang.org...
This is awesome! Does that mean we're going to see a DDMD release for
2.067?
It's possible if someone wants to update the release scripts and coordinate
with Martin.
On Saturday, 21 February 2015 at 14:02:41 UTC, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first
time, an unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build
druntime and phobos and pass all the test suites.
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message
news:mcb28b$2iab$1...@digitalmars.com...
Fantastic. Thanks for hacking at this for so long. I assume going forward
things will be easier because we won't accept pulls that break ddmd?
Yes, once everything has been moved into master the autotester will
Shammah Chancellor wrote in message news:mcb4nf$2kd5$1...@digitalmars.com...
Awesome! Now those of us who don't want to work in C++ can start helping?
Possibly?
It will still be a while before development switches to D, at the moment all
patches still need to be against the C++ source.
On Saturday, 21 February 2015 at 14:02:41 UTC, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first
time, an unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build
druntime and phobos and pass all the test suites.
On 2015-02-21 14:02:47 +, Daniel Murphy said:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first time, an
unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build druntime and
phobos and pass all the test suites.
Hopefully in the
On 2/21/15 6:02 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first time, an
unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build druntime and
phobos and pass all the test suites.
Hopefully in the next couple
safety0ff wrote in message news:shcmppjlvivoybbyn...@forum.dlang.org...
Congrats!
Does version=GC need any additional work?
Yes, version=GC is still broken. It should be enough to hook C++ new/delete
and fix a few malloc vs rmem.malloc issues.
All of the frontend and root (except
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 01:02:47AM +1100, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first time,
an unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build druntime and
phobos and pass all the
On Saturday, 21 February 2015 at 14:02:41 UTC, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first
time, an unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build
druntime and phobos and pass all the test suites.
On Saturday, 21 February 2015 at 14:02:41 UTC, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first
time, an unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build
druntime and phobos and pass all the test suites.
On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 01:02:47 +1100, Daniel Murphy wrote:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first time, an
unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build druntime and
phobos and pass all the test suites.
On Saturday, 21 February 2015 at 14:02:41 UTC, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first
time, an unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build
druntime and phobos and pass all the test suites.
Does it's mean that next release of DMD would have name DDMD?
Or it would be two branch at first time DMD and DDMD?
Or DDMD would be renamed to DMD?
On 21/02/15 15:02, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first time, an
unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build druntime and phobos and
pass all the test suites.
That's
2015-02-21 15:02 GMT+01:00 Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first time, an
unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build druntime and phobos
and pass
On Saturday, 21 February 2015 at 14:02:41 UTC, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first
time, an unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build
druntime and phobos and pass all the test suites.
Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.7024.1424528844.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
I can't wait for the day the only command necessary to build DMD is going
to be:
$ rdmd src/main.d
:)
Something like
rdmd mars.d -J.. -d glue.lib backend.lib
almost works
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first time, an
unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build druntime and phobos
and pass all the test suites.
Hopefully in the next couple of weeks the remaining minor issues
On Saturday, 21 February 2015 at 14:02:41 UTC, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
Nice!
On 2/21/15, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/?projectid=10
This is a pretty big milestone for the project. For the first time, an
unpatched dmd can build ddmd, and that ddmd can build druntime and phobos
and pass all the
36 matches
Mail list logo
