On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 22:44:32 UTC, Freddy wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP67
Abstraction over the build-in associative array(one type of
range
for containers and another type for dynamic generators).
Plese criticize.
Any examples of what this actually accomplishes? Maybe an example
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 at 00:04:18 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
... opIndex and opBinaryRight are already container ...
Correction: opBinaryRight!in
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 at 00:04:18 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 22:44:32 UTC, Freddy wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP67
Abstraction over the build-in associative array(one type of
range
for containers and another type for dynamic generators).
Plese criticize.
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 12:04:16AM +, Jakob Ovrum via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 22:44:32 UTC, Freddy wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP67
Abstraction over the build-in associative array(one type of range
for containers and another type for dynamic generators).
Brad Anderson:
you rarely want
to iterate through an associative array without having both the
key and the value on hand.
This is very false. I have tons of cases where you only iterate
on values or keys. On the other hand I have suggested several
times that I'd like a byPairs (that yields
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 06:59:09 UTC, bearophile wrote:
This is very false. I have tons of cases where you only iterate
on values or keys. On the other hand I have suggested several
times that I'd like a byPairs (that yields keys-values tuple
pairs).
It happens to me too but it's
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:23:07PM +, Brad Anderson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 06:59:09 UTC, bearophile wrote:
This is very false. I have tons of cases where you only iterate on
values or keys. On the other hand I have suggested several times that
I'd like a
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 17:36:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:23:07PM +, Brad Anderson via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 06:59:09 UTC, bearophile
wrote:
This is very false. I have tons of cases where you only
iterate
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 18:04:30 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 17:36:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:23:07PM +, Brad Anderson via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 06:59:09 UTC, bearophile
wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 18:40:51 UTC, Freddy wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 18:04:30 UTC, John Colvin
wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 17:36:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:23:07PM +, Brad Anderson via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 06:40:50PM +, Freddy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 18:04:30 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 17:36:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
I've submitted a PR for byPair before, but it was roadblocked by
H. S. Teoh:
And how would it be implemented in a way that is stable across
AA implementations?
Adding tuples as first-class entities in the language, and
deprecating std.typecons.Tuple :-)
Bye,
bearophile
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 19:55:14 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 06:40:50PM +, Freddy via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 18:04:30 UTC, John Colvin
wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 17:36:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 22:44:32 UTC, Freddy wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP67
Abstraction over the build-in associative array(one type of
range
for containers and another type for dynamic generators).
Plese criticize.
Does any one now a better way to implement lazy associative
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:33:53PM +, Freddy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 19:55:14 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
And how would it be implemented in a way that is stable across AA
implementations?
--T
in std.range
auto
On Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 00:10:47 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:33:53PM +, Freddy via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 19:55:14 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
And how would it be implemented in a way that is
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP67
Abstraction over the build-in associative array(one type of range
for containers and another type for dynamic generators).
Plese criticize.
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 22:44:32 UTC, Freddy wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP67
Abstraction over the build-in associative array(one type of
range
for containers and another type for dynamic generators).
Plese criticize.
It's kind of a weird proposal to be honest. Ranges primitives are
18 matches
Mail list logo
