On Saturday, 2 July 2016 at 09:22:48 UTC, Joakim Brännström wrote:
On Saturday, 2 July 2016 at 08:11:48 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
The Bytecode interpreter is now CTFEable :)
Good job Stefan. The PR looks really interesting.
I'll be looking into using your engine I future projects so I
hope
On Saturday, 2 July 2016 at 08:11:48 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
The Bytecode interpreter is now CTFEable :)
Good job Stefan. The PR looks really interesting.
I'll be looking into using your engine I future projects so I
hope that it will be available in some way or another :)
// Joakim
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 23:27:10 UTC, lobo wrote:
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 11:09:10 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 10:36:44 UTC, qznc wrote:
Off-topic: Is it possible/feasible/desirable to let dmd use
dub packages?
please, no. not everybody out there is dub fan.
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 11:09:10 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 10:36:44 UTC, qznc wrote:
Off-topic: Is it possible/feasible/desirable to let dmd use
dub packages?
please, no. not everybody out there is dub fan.
You can always use dub to fetch packages into
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 15:53:19 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
Also almost every dynamic language has some sort of eval
function can be used to evaluate arbitrary code at run-time.
And almost every language guideline suggest to never use it. When
people have to use it, it usually ends in a
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 15:53:19 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 14:14:41 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 10:36:44 UTC, qznc wrote:
Ok, seriously, it sounds like an awesome feat, but I don't
think it is necessary to put it into Phobos. First, a dub
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 14:14:41 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 10:36:44 UTC, qznc wrote:
Ok, seriously, it sounds like an awesome feat, but I don't
think it is necessary to put it into Phobos. First, a dub
package, please.
Agree. Does Java even have something like
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 10:36:44 UTC, qznc wrote:
Ok, seriously, it sounds like an awesome feat, but I don't
think it is necessary to put it into Phobos. First, a dub
package, please.
Agree. Does Java even have something like that? That's sort of
the exemplar for "hopelessly overdone
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 10:28:03 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi,
I recently had a breakthrough in my CTFE work.
Though because habits die hard.
I am writing the bytecode-engine in a CTFEable style.
Therefore I can be used as a quite comfortable IR for CTFE
things as well.
It should be
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 11:09:10 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 10:36:44 UTC, qznc wrote:
Off-topic: Is it possible/feasible/desirable to let dmd use
dub packages?
please, no. not everybody out there is dub fan.
Off-topic:
@ketmar: if it's on dub (d's official package
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 10:36:44 UTC, qznc wrote:
Off-topic: Is it possible/feasible/desirable to let dmd use dub
packages?
please, no. not everybody out there is dub fan.
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 10:28:03 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi,
I recently had a breakthrough in my CTFE work.
Though because habits die hard.
I am writing the bytecode-engine in a CTFEable style.
Therefore I can be used as a quite comfortable IR for CTFE
things as well.
It should be
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 at 10:28:03 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi,
I recently had a breakthrough in my CTFE work.
Though because habits die hard.
I am writing the bytecode-engine in a CTFEable style.
Therefore I can be used as a quite comfortable IR for CTFE
things as well.
It should be
Hi,
I recently had a breakthrough in my CTFE work.
Though because habits die hard.
I am writing the bytecode-engine in a CTFEable style.
Therefore I can be used as a quite comfortable IR for CTFE things
as well.
It should be fairly easy to generate a inline-asm-string from the
byteCode at
14 matches
Mail list logo
