On 28/06/15 00:25, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I thought that 10.6 was the one that we dropped support for because it
didn't support TLS or something like that.
That's true, only 10.7 and later supports TLS. But we're still using
emulated TLS, so it doesn't matter. LDC, which is using native
On 27/06/2015 4:09 a.m., Dicebot wrote:
Judging purely by feature set, Win 10 looks first Windows ever which
will actually be usable for work. At least it will have multiple
desktops
Fun fact: WinAPI has pretty much always supported multiple desktops. The
UI just didn't support changing
On 26 June 2015 at 09:29, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org wrote:
On 26 Jun 2015 09:28, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org wrote:
On 25 Jun 2015 12:16, ponce via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 16:10:44 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Saturday, 27 June 2015 at 06:39:18 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Also, does cv2pdb support converting D specific CV symbols?
Ping, is there any program that understands these symbols?
http://dlang.org/abi.html#codeview
Ddbg is a dead link, and all I can find is a dead 'Ddbg
successor' on
On 27/06/15 03:35, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
And even then, we might support fewer versions (e.g. IIRC, we
don't support all of the versions of Mac OS X that Apple does due to
issues with what the OS itself supported).
I'm not exactly sure which version we officially support but I'm pretty
On Saturday, 27 June 2015 at 20:35:02 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 27/06/15 03:35, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
And even then, we might support fewer versions (e.g. IIRC, we
don't support all of the versions of Mac OS X that Apple does
due to
issues with what the OS itself supported).
I'm not
On 25 Jun 2015 12:16, ponce via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 16:10:44 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/products/windows-server-2003/
Which means that (strictly speaking), in 3 weeks time, there will be
*no*
On 26 Jun 2015 09:28, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org wrote:
On 25 Jun 2015 12:16, ponce via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 16:10:44 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/products/windows-server-2003/
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 20:10:30 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 25-Jun-2015 23:06, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 6/25/15 3:58 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 25/06/15 18:46, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Heh, that's awesome actually :) Got a source for that?
Windows 8 was a big failure.
On 26-Jun-2015 10:35, rsw0x wrote:
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 20:10:30 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 25-Jun-2015 23:06, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 6/25/15 3:58 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 25/06/15 18:46, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Heh, that's awesome actually :) Got a source for that?
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 10:40:25 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
I do not know about others, but I am using XP, and have no plan
to move to something else any time soon. However, I am using it
rarely, in a VM, whenever I need to test something on Windows.
I have no plan of buying a newer Windows. I
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 19:58:14 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 25/06/15 18:46, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Heh, that's awesome actually :) Got a source for that?
Windows 8 was a big failure. Windows 10 is looking much better,
I think it will get a much higher adaption rate.
Off-topic,
On 06/25/2015 04:06 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 6/25/15 3:58 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 25/06/15 18:46, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Heh, that's awesome actually :) Got a source for that?
Windows 8 was a big failure. Windows 10 is looking much better, I think
it will get a much higher
Judging purely by feature set, Win 10 looks first Windows ever
which will actually be usable for work. At least it will have
multiple desktops and primitive package management. And no,
Windows XP was not usable by any means.
It isn't a good enough reason to switch back to Windows though :)
On 06/26/2015 07:26 AM, weaselcat wrote:
Might as well just use wine, it's pretty darn good nowadays.
Relatively speaking. I'm definitely glad to have it, but I still have
occasional problems with it, with various programs. For example, I had
to give up my favorite code editor because of
On 06/26/2015 07:31 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Well, be aware that we don't officially support XP and haven't for a
while. Odds are, it'll work in most cases, but there may be
functionality in druntime or Phobos which relies on system calls added
to Windows in Vista. So, while you're obviously
On 06/26/2015 07:34 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 26-Jun-2015 10:35, rsw0x wrote:
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 20:10:30 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
AFAIK they found that way too many apps do checks like:
if(windowsVersion.startsWith(Windows 9){
// use crappy legacy-compatible code
}
else{
On 06/26/2015 12:09 PM, Dicebot wrote:
Judging purely by feature set, Win 10 looks first Windows ever which
will actually be usable for work.
It'll still look like unicorn vomit, though. And they don't let you
change that anymore. And MS doesn't let you reconfigure much these days,
so you
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 16:10:44 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
[...]
Win Xp, 7, 8, 10, ...
ReactOS - This Is The Future! :-)
http://reactos.org
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 16:45:45 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 06/26/2015 07:31 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Well, be aware that we don't officially support XP and haven't
for a
while. Odds are, it'll work in most cases, but there may be
functionality in druntime or Phobos which relies on
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 16:10:44 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/products/windows-server-2003/
Which means that (strictly speaking), in 3 weeks time, there
will be *no* operating system that supports CodeView debugging.
This is an elongated way of
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 10:40:25 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 16:10:44 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
[...]
I do not know about others, but I am using XP, and have no plan
to move to something else any time soon. However, I am using it
rarely, in a VM, whenever I need
On 25/06/15 18:46, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Heh, that's awesome actually :) Got a source for that?
Windows 8 was a big failure. Windows 10 is looking much better, I think
it will get a much higher adaption rate.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 6/24/15 12:10 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/products/windows-server-2003/
Which means that (strictly speaking), in 3 weeks time, there will be
*no* operating system that supports CodeView debugging.
This is an elongated way of asking
Can I remove -gc
On 6/25/15 3:58 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 25/06/15 18:46, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Heh, that's awesome actually :) Got a source for that?
Windows 8 was a big failure. Windows 10 is looking much better, I think
it will get a much higher adaption rate.
With their track record of every
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 16:10:44 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/products/windows-server-2003/
Which means that (strictly speaking), in 3 weeks time, there
will be *no* operating system that supports CodeView debugging.
This is an elongated way of
On 25-Jun-2015 23:06, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 6/25/15 3:58 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 25/06/15 18:46, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Heh, that's awesome actually :) Got a source for that?
Windows 8 was a big failure. Windows 10 is looking much better, I think
it will get a much higher
On 6/25/15 4:10 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 25-Jun-2015 23:06, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 6/25/15 3:58 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 25/06/15 18:46, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Heh, that's awesome actually :) Got a source for that?
Windows 8 was a big failure. Windows 10 is looking much
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 13:53:40 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
And server OS migration moves much slower usually.
Is it so? Do you mean windows server OS specifically?
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 13:53:40 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/24/15 12:10 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/products/windows-server-2003/
Which means that (strictly speaking), in 3 weeks time, there
will be
*no* operating system that supports
On 06/25/2015 09:53 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
XP still has more market share right now than Windows 8.1, and that was
EOL in April 2014.
Heh, that's awesome actually :) Got a source for that?
On 6/25/15 12:46 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 06/25/2015 09:53 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
XP still has more market share right now than Windows 8.1, and that was
EOL in April 2014.
Heh, that's awesome actually :) Got a source for that?
http://www.quora.com/What-is-the-windows-server-market-share-by-version
Can't find any info on it.
On 6/25/15 11:27 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 13:53:40 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
And server OS migration moves much slower usually.
Is it so? Do you mean windows server OS specifically?
I mean people who are in charge of maintaining company-wide systems that
are
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 16:05:57 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I mean people who are in charge of maintaining company-wide
systems that are expensive to upgrade do not upgrade their
equipment or OS as often as those who buy desktops/laptops.
To upgrade from XP you need to upgrade
cv2pdb?
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/products/windows-server-2003/
Which means that (strictly speaking), in 3 weeks time, there will
be *no* operating system that supports CodeView debugging.
This is an elongated way of asking
Can I remove -gc yet?
But as I'm not a Windows user,
37 matches
Mail list logo
