Re: Github woes

2016-02-07 Thread Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
On 07/02/16 11:22 PM, Wobbles wrote: Just curious, is there a backup plan for D if github.com goes by the wayside? Now that there seems to be community back-lash against it (at least on reddit) maybe a contingency plan would be useful. Obviously not today or tomorrow, but you never know what's

Re: Github woes

2016-02-07 Thread ZombineDev via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 10:22:35 UTC, Wobbles wrote: Just curious, is there a backup plan for D if github.com goes by the wayside? Now that there seems to be community back-lash against it (at least on reddit) maybe a contingency plan would be useful. Obviously not today or tomorrow,

Github woes

2016-02-07 Thread Wobbles via Digitalmars-d
Just curious, is there a backup plan for D if github.com goes by the wayside? Now that there seems to be community back-lash against it (at least on reddit) maybe a contingency plan would be useful. Obviously not today or tomorrow, but you never know what's down the road.

Re: Github woes

2016-02-07 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 10:27:02 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote: On 07/02/16 11:22 PM, Wobbles wrote: Just curious, is there a backup plan for D if github.com goes by the wayside? Now that there seems to be community back-lash against it (at least on reddit) maybe a contingency plan

Re: Github woes

2016-02-07 Thread rsw0x via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 10:48:49 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 10:27:02 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote: On 07/02/16 11:22 PM, Wobbles wrote: [...] The only thing that we have hosted on Github is code. So excluding integrations, we could move over to Bitbucket without

Re: Github woes

2016-02-07 Thread Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
On 02/07/2016 05:48 AM, Joakim wrote: Unfortunately, there's a lot of valuable info in the PR comments, that would be lost if github.com went down. Since D never switched from bugzilla to github for bugs, that wouldn't be an issue. Hopefully, we could pull that github PR discussion from a