Re: Go vs. D vs Java 8

2014-07-12 Thread Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 11:29 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 07:17:39PM +0100, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 15:47 +, Meta via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Monday, 7 July 2014 at 15:33:06 UTC, bearophile wrote: If you

Re: Go vs. D vs Java 8

2014-07-12 Thread H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 03:01:19PM +0100, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 11:29 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] That was zen; this is tao. :P Very Sifu Anthony Korahais [...]

Re: Go vs. D vs Java 8

2014-07-12 Thread Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d
On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 07:37 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 03:01:19PM +0100, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 11:29 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] That was zen; this is tao. :P Very Sifu Anthony

Re: Go vs. D vs Java 8

2014-07-12 Thread Israel Rodriguez via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 7 July 2014 at 15:33:06 UTC, bearophile wrote: Nordlöw: Done. But that author doesn't switch to dmd 2.066beta1 :-) From the blog post: However, the language itself feels a bit old and a bit too much like C++. That's not strange considering its age, but you can’t help thinking

Re: Go vs. D vs Java 8

2014-07-12 Thread Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
On 07/12/2014 05:56 PM, Israel Rodriguez wrote: On Monday, 7 July 2014 at 15:33:06 UTC, bearophile wrote: From the blog post: However, the language itself feels a bit old and a bit too much like C++. That's not strange considering its age, but you can’t help thinking that time has left D a

Re: Go vs. D vs Java 8

2014-07-12 Thread Israel Rodriguez via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 12 July 2014 at 16:11:46 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: On 07/12/2014 05:56 PM, Israel Rodriguez wrote: On Monday, 7 July 2014 at 15:33:06 UTC, bearophile wrote: From the blog post: However, the language itself feels a bit old and a bit too much like C++. That's not strange considering

Re: Go vs. D vs Java 8

2014-07-10 Thread Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 15:47 +, Meta via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Monday, 7 July 2014 at 15:33:06 UTC, bearophile wrote: If you write it like java, it looks like java. This sentence struck me as very zen for some reason. Does this mean it is time for The Zen of D or Zen and the Art of D

Re: Go vs. D vs Java 8

2014-07-10 Thread H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 07:17:39PM +0100, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 15:47 +, Meta via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Monday, 7 July 2014 at 15:33:06 UTC, bearophile wrote: If you write it like java, it looks like java. This sentence struck me as very zen

Re: Go vs. D vs Java 8

2014-07-07 Thread Nordlöw
On Monday, 7 July 2014 at 05:51:32 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: If anyone's able to login there, maybe they could post a comment mentioning that SHA-256 (along with the rest of SHA-2) *is* in D as of the v2.066 beta. Done.

Re: Go vs. D vs Java 8

2014-07-07 Thread bearophile via Digitalmars-d
Nordlöw: Done. But that author doesn't switch to dmd 2.066beta1 :-) From the blog post: However, the language itself feels a bit old and a bit too much like C++. That's not strange considering its age, but you can’t help thinking that time has left D a bit behind. This is partially

Re: Go vs. D vs Java 8

2014-07-07 Thread Meta via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 7 July 2014 at 15:33:06 UTC, bearophile wrote: If you write it like java, it looks like java. This sentence struck me as very zen for some reason.

Go vs. D vs Java 8

2014-07-06 Thread chaoskampf via Digitalmars-d
saw this over at the Go subreddit, thought you guys might be interested: http://www.larsan.net/2014/07/06/go-vs-d-vs-java8/

Re: Go vs. D vs Java 8

2014-07-06 Thread Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
On 7/6/2014 8:43 PM, chaoskampf wrote: saw this over at the Go subreddit, thought you guys might be interested: http://www.larsan.net/2014/07/06/go-vs-d-vs-java8/ If anyone's able to login there, maybe they could post a comment mentioning that SHA-256 (along with the rest of SHA-2) *is* in D