On Sunday, 24 April 2016 at 11:25:46 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
There should be expand/collapse buttons for overload details so
you can compare them simultaneously.
That's not a bad idea, but I'm probably not going to do it just
because it doesn't fit well with my plan of separate pages for
e
On Sunday, 24 April 2016 at 07:56:07 UTC, default0 wrote:
Only thing I dislike about it is that the "Overload: signature>" thing of the currently selected overload vanishes
completely, instead of just changing color to suggest it is the
active one you selected.
Try it now:
http://dpldocs.info
On 04/24/2016 08:28 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
The use of hardcoded tags in ddoc output is a bit odd -- surely it
would be better to encode the list of symbols as entries in an
unnumbered list, and use CSS to style its layout as wished?
Great idea - could you please work on a PR to int
On Saturday, 23 April 2016 at 19:53:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 04/23/2016 03:50 PM, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 23.04.2016 21:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_experimental_allocator_building_blocks_affix_allocator.html#.AffixAllocator.goodAllocSize
Looks like almost
On Saturday, 23 April 2016 at 20:50:31 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I still can't get over the ridiculous grey constraints. WTF.
It's much better reading signatures than before.
But what we could do is add a margin-bottom to them if needed,
while keeping the others hugged up.
Good idea, probab
On Saturday, 23 April 2016 at 20:50:31 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 23 April 2016 at 20:06:39 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 23.04.2016 21:53, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Should we use a single ? -- Andrei
That would look better in the case you linked, but it would be
a step back with long
On 04/23/2016 04:50 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 23 April 2016 at 20:06:39 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 23.04.2016 21:53, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Should we use a single ? -- Andrei
That would look better in the case you linked, but it would be a step
back with longer signatures. E.g.
h
On 04/23/2016 04:06 PM, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 23.04.2016 21:53, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Should we use a single ? -- Andrei
That would look better in the case you linked, but it would be a step
back with longer signatures. E.g.
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm_searching.html#.endsWith
Go
On Saturday, 23 April 2016 at 20:06:39 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 23.04.2016 21:53, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Should we use a single ? -- Andrei
That would look better in the case you linked, but it would be
a step back with longer signatures. E.g.
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm_searchi
On 23.04.2016 21:53, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Should we use a single ? -- Andrei
That would look better in the case you linked, but it would be a step
back with longer signatures. E.g.
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm_searching.html#.endsWith
On 04/23/2016 03:50 PM, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 23.04.2016 21:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_experimental_allocator_building_blocks_affix_allocator.html#.AffixAllocator.goodAllocSize
Looks like almost a full line in between.
It is a full line ().
Should we use a sin
On 23.04.2016 21:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_experimental_allocator_building_blocks_affix_allocator.html#.AffixAllocator.goodAllocSize
Looks like almost a full line in between.
It is a full line ().
Isn't it too large?
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_experimental_allocator_building_blocks_affix_allocator.html#.AffixAllocator.goodAllocSize
Looks like almost a full line in between. Should be 25% of a line or so.
What do you all think?
Andrei
13 matches
Mail list logo
