On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 01:29:40 +, lobo wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 23:08:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/25/2015 7:52 AM, wobbles wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 12:21:32 UTC, Martin Krejcirik wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 12:01:15 UTC, wobbles wrote:
The DOES
http://hammerprinciple.com/therighttool/statements/this-language-is-best-for-very-large-projects
--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44
On 25/03/2015 10:29 p.m., Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
http://hammerprinciple.com/therighttool/statements/this-language-is-best-for-very-large-projects
Huh, we come off pretty good. Makes me kinda question their research
techniques.
or
http://hammerprinciple.com/therighttool/statements/when-i-write-code-in-this-language-i-can-be-very-s
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 12:01:15 UTC, wobbles wrote:
The DOES POORLY AT... column is good reading here for how D
could improve ( though some of the comments are stupid. D has
an annoying syntax!?)
doeas poorly at annoying syntax = not annoying syntax
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 12:21:32 UTC, Martin Krejcirik
wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 12:01:15 UTC, wobbles wrote:
The DOES POORLY AT... column is good reading here for how D
could improve ( though some of the comments are stupid. D has
an annoying syntax!?)
doeas poorly at
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 09:29:40 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
http://hammerprinciple.com/therighttool/statements/this-language-is-best-for-very-large-projects
Nice one - I wonder what people answered to PROGRAMS WRITTEN IN
THIS LANGUAGE WILL USUALLY WORK IN FUTURE VERSIONS OF THE
Ugh, I haven't looked too closely at this, but they apparently
also ignore those that are undecided? Meaning that numbers like
90% meant X actually could be 9% meant X and 90% are undecided.
Looks like entertainment.
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 09:47:57 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 25/03/2015 10:29 p.m., Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
http://hammerprinciple.com/therighttool/statements/this-language-is-best-for-very-large-projects
Huh, we come off pretty good. Makes me kinda question their
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 09:29:40 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
http://hammerprinciple.com/therighttool/statements/this-language-is-best-for-very-large-projects
The D comparison with C++ is interesting, it sums up why I use D.
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 12:21:32 UTC, Martin Krejcirik
wrote:
doeas poorly at annoying syntax = not annoying syntax
Yea, these charts are confusing, with the double negatives and
the green up arrows next to negative aspects. A pro/con list
would be much more clear.
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 12:21:32 UTC, Martin Krejcirik
wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 12:01:15 UTC, wobbles wrote:
The DOES POORLY AT... column is good reading here for how D
could improve ( though some of the comments are stupid. D has
an annoying syntax!?)
doeas poorly at
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 19:41:38 UTC, Mengu wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 15:53:34 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
Ugh, I haven't looked too closely at this, but they apparently
also ignore those that are undecided? Meaning that numbers
like 90% meant X actually could be 9%
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 15:53:34 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Ugh, I haven't looked too closely at this, but they apparently
also ignore those that are undecided? Meaning that numbers like
90% meant X actually could be 9% meant X and 90% are undecided.
Looks like entertainment.
On 3/25/2015 7:52 AM, wobbles wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 12:21:32 UTC, Martin Krejcirik wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 12:01:15 UTC, wobbles wrote:
The DOES POORLY AT... column is good reading here for how D could improve (
though some of the comments are stupid. D has an
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 23:08:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/25/2015 7:52 AM, wobbles wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 12:21:32 UTC, Martin Krejcirik
wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 12:01:15 UTC, wobbles wrote:
The DOES POORLY AT... column is good reading here for how
D
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 09:47:24 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
or
http://hammerprinciple.com/therighttool/statements/when-i-write-code-in-this-language-i-can-be-very-s
Interesting site.
The DOES POORLY AT... column is good reading here for how D
could improve ( though some of the comments are
17 matches
Mail list logo