On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 at 15:09:36 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
I cannot speak about small team experiences. Our projects
usually take around 30+ developers.
That it is a decent sized team to have to coordinate and it
puts emphasis on very different questions. The context I am
thinking of
Out of curiosity, what is lacking in the current commercial
offerings for hedge fund management? Why not use an existing
engine?
In the general sense, lots is lacking across the board. I
started a macro fund in 2012 with a former colleague from Citadel
in partnership with another company,
On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 at 06:08:34 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
There was also this one from 1998 that was very small
http://www.javaworld.com/article/2076641/learn-java/an-introduction-to-the-java-ring.html
Java has some history running on small devices.
Cheers,
uri
Indeed, and I
On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 at 19:27:43 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
One of the things that was striking was the very limited set of
choices available for a portfolio management system. Macro
involves trading potentially any liquid product in any
developed (and sometimes less developed) market,
I cannot speak about small team experiences. Our projects
usually take around 30+ developers.
That it is a decent sized team to have to coordinate and it puts
emphasis on very different questions. The context I am thinking
of is much leaner - more like special forces than the regular
army
On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 at 13:02:06 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 at 02:39:03 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Which language today does something that's not done by any
other language?
INTERCAL has politeness. But what are you actually trying to
say with this statement?
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 22:05:55 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
I don't know F#. I know what you mean, but I don't think the
competition to D consists of crappy languages - there are some
very smart and creative people with large resources working on
them (putting aside the question of the
On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 at 13:02:06 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 22:05:55 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
I don't know F#. I know what you mean, but I don't think the
competition to D consists of crappy languages - there are some
very smart and creative people with large
On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 at 15:09:36 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
I cannot speak about small team experiences. Our projects
usually take around 30+ developers.
That it is a decent sized team to have to coordinate and it
puts emphasis on very different questions. The context I am
thinking of
On Sunday, 25 January 2015 at 21:50:53 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
And beyond slower execution speed of Java, the memory bloat
makes a big difference given how cloud pricing works (its
peanuts to get a machine with a gig of ram, but 64 gig is not
so cheap, and quickly gets very expensive - and
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 18:53:45 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Sunday, 25 January 2015 at 21:50:53 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
And beyond slower execution speed of Java, the memory bloat
makes a big difference given how cloud pricing works (its
peanuts to get a machine with a gig of
If Java consumes 15% more power doing it, does
it matter on a PC? Most people don't dare. Does it matter for
small-scale server environments? Maybe not. Does it matter
when you deploy Hadoop on a 10,000 node cluster, and the
holistic inefficiency (multiple things running concurrently)
goes
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 20:55:14 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 20:19:09 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Does Rust have the productivity of D? And it doesn't have the
maturity, as I understand it.
This brings up something that's been bugging me. D has a pitch
for users
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 20:19:09 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Does Rust have the productivity of D? And it doesn't have the
maturity, as I understand it.
This brings up something that's been bugging me. D has a pitch
for users of a lot of crappy languages, but what do we say when
the
There was also this one from 1998 that was very small
http://www.javaworld.com/article/2076641/learn-java/an-introduction-to-the-java-ring.html
Java has some history running on small devices.
Cheers,
uri
Indeed, and I remember that well.
However I was less interested in embedded devices
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 22:53:15 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 22:12:24 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
If Java consumes 15% more power doing it, does
it matter on a PC? Most people don't dare. Does it matter
for small-scale server environments? Maybe not. Does it
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 20:55:14 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 20:19:09 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Does Rust have the productivity of D? And it doesn't have the
maturity, as I understand it.
This brings up something that's been bugging me. D has a pitch
for users
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 04:50 +, uri via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Java has some history running on small devices.
And, after all, Java (née Oak) was invented for programming white goods
operating systems. Also set top boxes. The first tablet, Star7, appeared
long before iPad.
FTR JavaCard has
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 22:12:24 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
If Java consumes 15% more power doing it, does
it matter on a PC? Most people don't dare. Does it matter for
small-scale server environments? Maybe not. Does it matter
when you deploy Hadoop on a 10,000 node cluster, and the
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 20:55:14 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 20:19:09 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Does Rust have the productivity of D? And it doesn't have the
maturity, as I understand it.
This brings up something that's been bugging me. D has a pitch
for users
Yup, most people like to shit on Java, but quite frankly, the
ecosystem is way ahead of what exists on most platform.
It is even fairly common to get a Java program up and running +
tweaking of the JVM is less time and with better performance than
what you would have in C++.
Obviously,
On Sunday, 25 January 2015 at 21:50:53 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
The author talks about C++ performance but D can match it
whilst bringing scripting language style programmer
productivity, and arguably higher quality code (because you can
understand the code base as a coherent whole).
The author talks about C++ performance but D can match it whilst
bringing scripting language style programmer productivity, and
arguably higher quality code (because you can understand the code
base as a coherent whole). Integration with C++ libraries is
really the last missing piece, and it
23 matches
Mail list logo
