On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 17:20:14 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they develop in D)? The question occurred to me
somehow while browsing some D posts
On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 13:19:47 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 12:29:48 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 4/24/17 1:43 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
"Dashing, awesome, ultra-attractive programmer with an
impeccably fine
taste in languages."
It's a bit long
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 12:29:48 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/24/17 1:43 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
"Dashing, awesome, ultra-attractive programmer with an
impeccably fine
taste in languages."
It's a bit long and doesn't include the letter D
FIFY
-Steve
On 4/24/17 1:43 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
"Dashing, awesome, ultra-attractive programmer with an impeccably fine
taste in languages."
It's a bit long and doesn't include the letter D
FIFY
-Steve
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 17:20:14 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they develop in D)? The question occurred to me
somehow while browsing some D posts
On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 at 15:38:16 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 17:20:14 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
[snip]
DLanger? DLangist? D'er? Doer? :)
Martian.
These seem to be all Dlighted programmers :D
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 17:20:14 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
[snip]
DLanger? DLangist? D'er? Doer? :)
Martian.
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 17:20:14 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they develop in D)? The question occurred to me
somehow while browsing some D posts
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 17:20:14 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they develop in D)? The question occurred to me
somehow while browsing some D posts
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 17:20:14 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they develop in D)? The question occurred to me
somehow while browsing some D posts
On Saturday, 22 April 2017 at 17:17:46 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
On Saturday, 22 April 2017 at 08:30:03 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 17:20 +, Vasudev Ram via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means:
On 04/21/2017 01:20 PM, Vasudev Ram wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject. If not, it
means: what are D developers generally called (to indicate that they
develop in D)?
"Suave, awesome, ultra-attractive programmer with an impeccably fine
taste in
On Saturday, 22 April 2017 at 08:30:03 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Terms such as Pythonista, Rubyist, Rustacean, Gopher, etc. are
terms of tribalism and exclusion. They are attempts to ensure
people claiming membership of the tribe reject being polyglot
by pressuring them to eschew all other
On 04/23/2017 07:55 AM, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Saturday, 22 April 2017 at 08:30:03 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Terms such as Pythonista, Rubyist, Rustacean, Gopher, etc. are terms
of tribalism and exclusion. They are attempts to ensure people
claiming membership of the tribe reject being
On Saturday, 22 April 2017 at 08:30:03 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Terms such as Pythonista, Rubyist, Rustacean, Gopher, etc. are
terms of tribalism and exclusion. They are attempts to ensure
people claiming membership of the tribe reject being polyglot
by pressuring them to eschew all other
On Saturday, 22 April 2017 at 08:30:03 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Terms such as Pythonista, Rubyist, Rustacean, Gopher, etc. are
terms of tribalism and exclusion. They are attempts to ensure
people claiming membership of the tribe reject being polyglot
by pressuring them to eschew all other
On Saturday, 22 April 2017 at 17:37:13 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
I actually worked years ago, for a while, on a legacy banking
software product written in C
In fact, that one was in Microsoft C for DOS 3.0 ... !!! :)
I actually also worked some years later on another product in C,
which had
On Saturday, 22 April 2017 at 08:33:04 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 21:20 -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
I've never heard of anyone doing anything like this in any
language.
Normally, you'd just say that someone is a D programmer or a
C++
programmer
On Saturday, 22 April 2017 at 08:30:03 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 17:20 +, Vasudev Ram via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they
On Saturday, 22 April 2017 at 04:20:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, April 21, 2017 17:20:14 Vasudev Ram via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 22:11:19 UTC, Namespace wrote:
nuDist - in D you can program as free as you want. ;)
void main()
body
{
asm
{
naked;
}
}
On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 21:20 -0700, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
[…]
> I've never heard of anyone doing anything like this in any language.
> Normally, you'd just say that someone is a D programmer or a C++
> programmer
> or a Java Programmer, etc. But then again, I come from a C++
On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 17:20 +, Vasudev Ram via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject. If
> not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
> indicate that they develop in D)? The question occurred to me
> somehow while
On Friday, April 21, 2017 17:20:14 Vasudev Ram via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject. If
> not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
> indicate that they develop in D)? The question occurred to me
> somehow while
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 21:33:59 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 19:26:34 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
Duh.
Deity. Disciples. Denizens. Dastards. Demons. Deliverers.
Dreamers.
Dis thread seems to be doing well, wonder what de devil it will
be like in hell.
De D
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 17:20:14 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they develop in D)? The question occurred to me
somehow while browsing some D posts on the
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 17:20:14 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they develop in D)? The question occurred to me
somehow while browsing some D posts
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 19:26:34 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 17:20:14 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they develop in D)?
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 17:20:14 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they develop in D)? The question occurred to me
somehow while browsing some D posts
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 17:20:14 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they develop in D)? The question occurred to me
somehow while browsing some D posts
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 18:26:30 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 18:16:55 UTC, Meta wrote:
I prefer the term Deity.
Talk about D'lusions of granD're ;)
Disciples
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 18:16:55 UTC, Meta wrote:
I prefer the term Deity.
Talk about D'lusions of granD're ;)
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 17:20:14 UTC, Vasudev Ram wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they develop in D)? The question occurred to me
somehow while browsing some D posts
On Friday, 21 April 2017 at 17:29:37 UTC, ketmar wrote:
Vasudev Ram wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject.
If not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they develop in D)? The question occurred to me
somehow while
Vasudev Ram wrote:
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject. If not, it
means: what are D developers generally called (to indicate that they
develop in D)? The question occurred to me somehow while browsing some D
posts on the forums just now.
DLanger?
Hi list,
I hope the question is self-evident from the message subject. If
not, it means: what are D developers generally called (to
indicate that they develop in D)? The question occurred to me
somehow while browsing some D posts on the forums just now.
DLanger? DLangist? D'er? Doer? :)
I
36 matches
Mail list logo
