On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:28:34 UTC, nbro wrote:
Hi!
I've been following D for at least one year. I like it and I
think it's a very good programming language, even though I do
not agree with everything it's being done.
One thing that has saddened me is seeing a lot of D's users
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 03:05:44 UTC, nbro wrote:
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:57:05 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:28:34 UTC, nbro wrote:
How could you do such a thing?
freakin' easy: just pay people to do what you want. either
that, or people will keep
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 03:26:40 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 03:05:44 UTC, nbro wrote:
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:57:05 UTC, ketmar wrote:
[...]
Serious users, to whom I'm directing this post, who really
believe in D's potential, should try to
On Tuesday, 17 January 2017 at 12:45:09 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Ironically I wrote the only (e)book on CTFE[0].
Its a bit out of date and needs some work, but if you want to
give me some feedback please email me and I'll get you a coupon
(free).
[0] https://leanpub.com/ctfe
Thanks,
On 18/01/2017 12:38 AM, strymon wrote:
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:28:34 UTC, nbro wrote:
Hi!
I've been following D for at least one year. I like it and I think
it's a very good programming language, even though I do not agree with
everything it's being done.
One thing that has
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:28:34 UTC, nbro wrote:
Hi!
I've been following D for at least one year. I like it and I
think it's a very good programming language, even though I do
not agree with everything it's being done.
One thing that has saddened me is seeing a lot of D's users
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:28:34 UTC, nbro wrote:
Hi!
I've been following D for at least one year. I like it and I
think it's a very good programming language, even though I do
not agree with everything it's being done.
One thing that has saddened me is seeing a lot of D's users
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:28:34 UTC, nbro wrote:
These could be a few starting ideas and options.
To me it sounds like we need better ways of programmers to
connect with eachother and discuss. Maybe a library subforum or
something?
On 15/01/2017 12:38 AM, nbro wrote:
Nobody has understood yet the goal of this post.
I'm not saying that everybody should work in a team or shouldn't try to
create what one needs, if there isn't a better alternative.
I'm suggesting that for a few interesting, useful and possibly valuable
Nobody has understood yet the goal of this post.
I'm not saying that everybody should work in a team or shouldn't
try to create what one needs, if there isn't a better alternative.
I'm suggesting that for a few interesting, useful and possibly
valuable projects, before they start (but
I tend to see projects in one of three states:
1. It doesn't exist.
2. It exists, but the last update was six months ago and it's broken.
3. It exists, does what I want, and I can use it with at most small
workarounds.
If it doesn't exist, I have to make it myself.
If it's broken and
On 14/01/2017 3:59 PM, nbro wrote:
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:41:00 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
The only way to get qualified to do these tasks like GUI toolkits is
by doing. Keep this in mind.
As somebody who does indeed do implement multiple libraries at one
time you're looking at
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 03:05:44 UTC, nbro wrote:
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:57:05 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:28:34 UTC, nbro wrote:
How could you do such a thing?
freakin' easy: just pay people to do what you want. either
that, or people will keep
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:57:05 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:28:34 UTC, nbro wrote:
How could you do such a thing?
freakin' easy: just pay people to do what you want. either
that, or people will keep working on the things *they* are
interested (and not
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:41:00 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
The only way to get qualified to do these tasks like GUI
toolkits is by doing. Keep this in mind.
As somebody who does indeed do implement multiple libraries at
one time you're looking at it the wrong way. I switch between
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 02:28:34 UTC, nbro wrote:
How could you do such a thing?
freakin' easy: just pay people to do what you want. either that,
or people will keep working on the things *they* are interested
(and not someone else).
The only way to get qualified to do these tasks like GUI toolkits is by
doing. Keep this in mind.
As somebody who does indeed do implement multiple libraries at one time
you're looking at it the wrong way. I switch between projects over
periods that last for years not days or weeks. The point
17 matches
Mail list logo
