On Saturday, 6 June 2015 at 20:27:12 UTC, anonymous wrote:
The seemingly obvious thing to do: Pass the source files that
need rebuilding and the object files of other modules to one
dmd invocation.
I implemented this. Preliminary pull request:
On 2015-06-06 23:24, Atila Neves wrote:
I don't think I understand. Where would these object files come from
unless you're doing per-module compilation, C-style?
What I've already implemented is variant 1 mentioned before.
If you compile multiple files with DMD without linking it will
On 2015-06-06 23:41, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Doesn't work because no separate object file per source is being
produced. -- Andrei
They're produced if you don't link.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Saturday, 6 June 2015 at 19:44:15 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/6/15 11:47 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
[...]
I mean that rdmd should compile all files that has changed
including its dependencies, no more, no less. It should
compile all
these files in one go.
Yah, that's the
On 2015-06-05 18:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
This is a self-contained and really fun project:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14654
It looks like you want to support incremental compilation. Two questions:
* Is that possible? I know there has been some problems with this in the
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 16:15:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
This is a self-contained and really fun project:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14654
It requires an understanding of how rdmd currently works
(1KLOC in a single module!) and is of huge impact.
Who'd want to get
On 6/6/15 8:51 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
My $0.02: any project large enough to care about if rdmd builds per
package or not is likely to need a real build system anyway.
Integrating the strategy within rdmd will help make it popular and
widespread. I recall Liran has had issues with build times
On Saturday, 6 June 2015 at 15:54:39 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/6/15 8:51 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
My $0.02: any project large enough to care about if rdmd
builds per
package or not is likely to need a real build system anyway.
Integrating the strategy within rdmd will help make it
On 6/6/15 6:03 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-05 18:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
This is a self-contained and really fun project:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14654
It looks like you want to support incremental compilation. Two questions:
* Is that possible? I know there
On 2015-06-06 22:27, anonymous wrote:
The seemingly obvious thing to do: Pass the source files that need
rebuilding and the object files of other modules to one dmd invocation.
That's what I've been thinking all along and trying to say.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Saturday, 6 June 2015 at 21:24:05 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I don't think I understand. Where would these object files come
from unless you're doing per-module compilation, C-style?
Huh, I somehow assumed dmd would spit out multiple object files
when given multiple source files. Since that's
On 6/6/15 1:27 PM, anonymous wrote:
The seemingly obvious thing to do: Pass the source files that need
rebuilding and the object files of other modules to one dmd invocation.
Doesn't work because no separate object file per source is being
produced. -- Andrei
On 6/6/15 2:42 PM, anonymous wrote:
But if dmd could be made to produce multiple object files ...
(I have no idea if that's doable.)
Not advantageously. -- Andrei
On Saturday, 6 June 2015 at 21:10:22 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-06 22:27, anonymous wrote:
The seemingly obvious thing to do: Pass the source files that
need
rebuilding and the object files of other modules to one dmd
invocation.
That's what I've been thinking all along and
On 6/6/15 12:15 PM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 16:15:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
This is a self-contained and really fun project:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14654
It requires an understanding of how rdmd currently works (1KLOC in a
single module!)
On 2015-06-06 17:38, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Compiling several files at once is faster. The natural boundary is one
package.
Perhaps I misunderstand something. Why compile files that has not
changed? I mean that rdmd should compile all files that has changed
including its dependencies,
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 16:15:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
This is a self-contained and really fun project:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14654
It requires an understanding of how rdmd currently works
(1KLOC in a single module!) and is of huge impact.
Who'd want to get
On 6/6/15 11:47 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-06 17:38, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Compiling several files at once is faster. The natural boundary is one
package.
Perhaps I misunderstand something. Why compile files that has not
changed? I mean that rdmd should compile all files that
This is a self-contained and really fun project:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14654
It requires an understanding of how rdmd currently works (1KLOC in a
single module!) and is of huge impact.
Who'd want to get into it? I would if I didn't already have
std.allocator to have fun
19 matches
Mail list logo
