On Sunday, 29 January 2017 at 20:07:50 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
I started by trying to snap LDC, mainly because the cmake build
system made for a very easy integration with the snapcraft
package-build system. The LDC developers have been kind enough
to accept this as an official
On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 08:51:38 UTC, qznc wrote:
I just tried FlatPak and Snap. Snap is actually useable.
One of the first things that struck me about snap packaging was
the ease of its syntax and how straightforward it was to get
things working. I actually started creating snap
On Monday, 30 January 2017 at 16:53:34 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Snap packaging started as something Ubuntu were developing for
their use-case, but started gaining cross-distro interest last
year (probably because AFAICT its feature-set and simplicity of
use is quite a bit ahead of
On Tuesday, 31 January 2017 at 05:41:38 UTC, Joakim wrote:
He can't read every forum thread, you should email him. That's
what I did when I got his permission to put dmd in FreeBSD
ports.
Yes, I understand that, and I was going to do so anyway. But I
was interested in any case in some more
On Monday, 30 January 2017 at 23:47:50 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Monday, 30 January 2017 at 19:07:03 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
I don't understand where people keep getting that idea. It
very clearly states that all you need is to ask permission.
It's always been that way, and no
On Monday, 30 January 2017 at 19:07:03 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I don't understand where people keep getting that idea. It very
clearly states that all you need is to ask permission. It's
always been that way, and no reasonable request (or any at all
to my knowledge) has ever been denied.
On Monday, 30 January 2017 at 19:28:58 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Monday, 30 January 2017 at 16:53:34 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Yea, I'm a little sad to see the apparent lack of
feedback/interest :-\
I have interest, but as I've never heard of Snap before, I have
no comments. Others
On Monday, 30 January 2017 at 16:53:34 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Yea, I'm a little sad to see the apparent lack of
feedback/interest :-\
I have interest, but as I've never heard of Snap before, I have
no comments. Others may be in the same boat. Installation of D
compilers is
On 01/30/2017 09:40 AM, qznc wrote:
Is it legally possible to distribute DMD this way? Afaik only dlang.org
is allowed to distribute it publically due to the backend licence issue.
I don't understand where people keep getting that idea. It very clearly
states that all you need is to ask
On Monday, 30 January 2017 at 14:40:13 UTC, qznc wrote:
No comments? Well, there seems to be no downside (apart from
the work).
Yea, I'm a little sad to see the apparent lack of
feedback/interest :-\ I had quite a lot of fun creating these
packages and was hoping for a bit more curiosity.
On Sunday, 29 January 2017 at 20:07:50 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
The question is, (i) is this a welcome proposal? and (ii) if it
is welcome, what do people see as the best way to go about this?
No comments? Well, there seems to be no downside (apart from the
work).
So far, I
Hello all,
I thought it might be time to share more generally something I've
been working on for a little while: snap packages for some of the
core D projects.
For those who don't know, snap packages are a new format
developed by Ubuntu to facilitate upstreams being able to provide
the
12 matches
Mail list logo
