Re: Status of Deimos bindings

2015-05-26 Thread Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
On 2015-05-25 23:33, FreeSlave wrote: What's the current status of Deimos? I don't think that this kind of bindings is useless, since not everyone always wants dynamic bindings. E.g. for the sake of simplicity or static linking. Actually Walter even fixes issues in these bindings time by time,

Re: Status of Deimos bindings

2015-05-26 Thread Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
On 26/05/2015 7:24 p.m., ketmar wrote: On Tue, 26 May 2015 15:51:20 +1200, Rikki Cattermole wrote: Really what needs to happen is getting Derelict-Util into phobos. And some CTFE magic to create static bindings from those (if wanted). From there its just port the derelict libraries and

Re: Status of Deimos bindings

2015-05-26 Thread ketmar via Digitalmars-d
On Tue, 26 May 2015 15:51:20 +1200, Rikki Cattermole wrote: Really what needs to happen is getting Derelict-Util into phobos. And some CTFE magic to create static bindings from those (if wanted). From there its just port the derelict libraries and deimos ones to it and PR for phobos.

Re: Status of Deimos bindings

2015-05-26 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 04:09:09 UTC, weaselcat wrote: Please no, derelict bindings are incredibly heavyweight. I cut my application's size from ~6mb to 200kb by using glad openGL loader over derelict GL3. One of my goals for the current iteration of DerelictGL was to keep the size down,

Re: Status of Deimos bindings

2015-05-25 Thread Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 25 May 2015 at 21:43:18 UTC, rsw0x wrote: On Monday, 25 May 2015 at 21:33:15 UTC, FreeSlave wrote: What's the current status of Deimos? I don't think that this kind of bindings is useless, since not everyone always wants dynamic bindings. E.g. for the sake of simplicity or static

Status of Deimos bindings

2015-05-25 Thread FreeSlave via Digitalmars-d
What's the current status of Deimos? I don't think that this kind of bindings is useless, since not everyone always wants dynamic bindings. E.g. for the sake of simplicity or static linking. Actually Walter even fixes issues in these bindings time by time, so I guess the idea is still alive.

Re: Status of Deimos bindings

2015-05-25 Thread lobo via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 25 May 2015 at 21:33:15 UTC, FreeSlave wrote: What's the current status of Deimos? I don't think that this kind of bindings is useless, since not everyone always wants dynamic bindings. E.g. for the sake of simplicity or static linking. Actually Walter even fixes issues in these

Re: Status of Deimos bindings

2015-05-25 Thread rsw0x via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 25 May 2015 at 21:33:15 UTC, FreeSlave wrote: What's the current status of Deimos? I don't think that this kind of bindings is useless, since not everyone always wants dynamic bindings. E.g. for the sake of simplicity or static linking. Actually Walter even fixes issues in these

Re: Status of Deimos bindings

2015-05-25 Thread Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
And some CTFE magic to create static bindings from those (if wanted).

Re: Status of Deimos bindings

2015-05-25 Thread Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
On 26/05/2015 9:33 a.m., FreeSlave wrote: What's the current status of Deimos? I don't think that this kind of bindings is useless, since not everyone always wants dynamic bindings. E.g. for the sake of simplicity or static linking. Actually Walter even fixes issues in these bindings time by

Re: Status of Deimos bindings

2015-05-25 Thread weaselcat via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 03:51:22 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote: On 26/05/2015 9:33 a.m., FreeSlave wrote: What's the current status of Deimos? I don't think that this kind of bindings is useless, since not everyone always wants dynamic bindings. E.g. for the sake of simplicity or static