Re: Step into in debugging.

2017-02-25 Thread drug via Digitalmars-d
hmm.. I didn't change my nickname. It was my answer.

Re: Step into in debugging.

2017-02-25 Thread digitalmars via Digitalmars-d
Of course no. When I have some problem I google a solution and often I find it. I'm sure that sharing your solution may be useful for somebody else. But very often people that have solved theirs problem do not share solution - they think something like who cares and so on. You didn't shy to

Re: Step into in debugging.

2017-02-24 Thread ANtlord via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 22 February 2017 at 14:35:14 UTC, drug wrote: Thank you for sharing this! Sarcasm?

Re: Step into in debugging.

2017-02-22 Thread drug via Digitalmars-d
22.02.2017 17:32, ANtlord пишет: On Wednesday, 22 February 2017 at 14:23:02 UTC, ANtlord wrote: My bad again. It appears I have a smaller knowledge that I think. I'm ended up in typecons because `allocator` is made by template `scoped` returns instance of internal static struct `Scoped` and it

Re: Step into in debugging.

2017-02-22 Thread ANtlord via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 22 February 2017 at 14:23:02 UTC, ANtlord wrote: My bad again. It appears I have a smaller knowledge that I think. I'm ended up in typecons because `allocator` is made by template `scoped` returns instance of internal static struct `Scoped` and it has alias is asigned to method

Re: Step into in debugging.

2017-02-22 Thread ANtlord via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 20 February 2017 at 13:55:57 UTC, ANtlord wrote: Hello! I care for project DCD. I've wanted to fix some issue in it very long time ago. But when I get a little bit of free time I encounter one big problem for me. I can't debug it using GDB. I can't go through call stack because I

Re: Step into in debugging.

2017-02-20 Thread ANtlord via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 20 February 2017 at 13:55:57 UTC, ANtlord wrote: Hello! I care for project DCD. I've wanted to fix some issue in it very long time ago. But when I get a little bit of free time I encounter one big problem for me. I can't debug it using GDB. I can't go through call stack because I

Step into in debugging.

2017-02-20 Thread ANtlord via Digitalmars-d
Hello! I care for project DCD. I've wanted to fix some issue in it very long time ago. But when I get a little bit of free time I encounter one big problem for me. I can't debug it using GDB. I can't go through call stack because I get a number of issues. Long story short I've decided to

[Issue 11437] [Mago] No source for step-by-step debugging, only raw assembler.

2014-04-12 Thread d-bugmail
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11437 Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 11437] [Mago] No source for step-by-step debugging, only raw assembler.

2014-01-03 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11437 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2014-01-03 03:16:59 PST --- While I have added a workaround in mago for the test case, it is actually an instance of issue 7634. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 11437] [Mago] No source for step-by-step debugging, only raw assembler.

2014-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11437 --- Comment #4 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2014-01-02 17:31:28 MSK --- (In reply to comment #3) should be fixed by mago 0.9 in https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/visuald/releases/tag/v0.3.38beta1 Original

[Issue 11437] [Mago] No source for step-by-step debugging, only raw assembler.

2013-11-29 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11437 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2013-11-29 02:39:58 PST --- should be fixed by mago 0.9 in https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/visuald/releases/tag/v0.3.38beta1 -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 11437] [Mago] No source for step-by-step debugging, only raw assembler.

2013-11-06 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11437 Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 11437] New: [Mago] No source for step-by-step debugging, only raw assembler.

2013-11-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11437 Summary: [Mago] No source for step-by-step debugging, only raw assembler. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity

[Issue 11437] [Mago] No source for step-by-step debugging, only raw assembler.

2013-11-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11437 --- Comment #1 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2013-11-04 18:02:48 MSK --- Workaround: Play with the order libraries are passed to the linker. I.e. change the order, press Step into (F11), repeat if you still see raw