On Friday, 1 December 2017 at 15:51:42 UTC, Claude wrote:
On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 09:39:20 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 21:14:57 UTC, Claude wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 14:32:54 UTC, Basile B.
wrote:
Did I miss anything?
Sorry but yes, i
On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 09:39:20 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 21:14:57 UTC, Claude wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 14:32:54 UTC, Basile B.
wrote:
Did I miss anything?
Sorry but yes, i think so, the handle is indirectly accessible
with
On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 09:37:27 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 19:48:44 UTC, Nathan S. wrote:
Considering that one of those issues is that the logger
outputs garbage when given a wstring or a dstring, I would not
take this as an indication that
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 21:40:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
It was my understanding that there were still problems with its
design that Robert wanted to fix, but I don't know where any of
that stands. But certainly, I don't think that it makes sense
to push forward with trying to
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 21:14:57 UTC, Claude wrote:
...
Did I miss anything?
to write a bugzilla issue about it
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 21:14:57 UTC, Claude wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 14:32:54 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Hello, most of the changes made during the current year to the
std.experimental.logger package are related to the cosmetic
style. Isn't this a sign showing that the
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 19:48:44 UTC, Nathan S. wrote:
Considering that one of those issues is that the logger outputs
garbage when given a wstring or a dstring, I would not take
this as an indication that it's time to "graduate" the logger
from experimental.
That was fixed at
On Wednesday, November 29, 2017 14:32:54 Basile B. via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Hello, most of the changes made during the current year to the
> std.experimental.logger package are related to the cosmetic
> style. Isn't this a sign showing that the experimentation is
> achieved ?
>
>
> Facts:
> -
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 14:32:54 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Hello, most of the changes made during the current year to the
std.experimental.logger package are related to the cosmetic
style. Isn't this a sign showing that the experimentation is
achieved ?
I tried deriving FileLogger
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 14:32:54 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
- There only 4 issues for logger
Considering that one of those issues is that the logger outputs
garbage when given a wstring or a dstring, I would not take this
as an indication that it's time to "graduate" the logger from
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 14:32:54 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Hello, most of the changes made during the current year to the
std.experimental.logger package are related to the cosmetic
style. Isn't this a sign showing that the experimentation is
achieved ?
[...]
+1
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 14:32:54 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Hello, most of the changes made during the current year to the
std.experimental.logger package are related to the cosmetic
style. Isn't this a sign showing that the experimentation is
achieved ?
Facts:
- There only 4 issues
Hello, most of the changes made during the current year to the
std.experimental.logger package are related to the cosmetic
style. Isn't this a sign showing that the experimentation is
achieved ?
Facts:
- There only 4 issues for logger -
13 matches
Mail list logo
