Re: Using C++ everywhere D is makes things worst

2016-02-03 Thread jkpl via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 13:27:45 UTC, karabuta wrote: I understand many D programmers were formally(or still is or in-between) C++ but most explanations for certain things tells me either D is a C++ clone or I need to learn C++ first before I really understand D (kind of like C++ is a

Using C++ everywhere D is makes things worst

2016-02-03 Thread karabuta via Digitalmars-d
I understand many D programmers were formally(or still is or in-between) C++ but most explanations for certain things tells me either D is a C++ clone or I need to learn C++ first before I really understand D (kind of like C++ is a subset of D). I must say that I never coded C++ beyond "hello,

Re: Using C++ everywhere D is makes things worst

2016-02-03 Thread Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 13:27:45 UTC, karabuta wrote: I understand many D programmers were formally(or still is or in-between) C++ but most explanations for certain things tells me either D is a C++ clone or I need to learn C++ first before I really understand D (kind of like C++ is a

Re: Using C++ everywhere D is makes things worst

2016-02-03 Thread karabuta via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 15:40:08 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 13:27:45 UTC, karabuta wrote: I understand many D programmers were formally(or still is or in-between) C++ but most explanations for certain things tells me either D is a C++ clone or I need to

Re: Using C++ everywhere D is makes things worst

2016-02-03 Thread H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 05:47:56PM +, karabuta via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 15:40:08 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: > >On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 13:27:45 UTC, karabuta wrote: > >>I understand many D programmers were formally(or still is or > >>in-between) C++