On 2/26/2017 1:15 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Indeed, the routines in core.checkedint are everything needed (in addition to
some inline code for comparisons) if the purpose is to check operations
individually.
The purpose of core.checkedint is to provide the smallest possible building
On 2/26/17 4:53 AM, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 26 February 2017 at 09:41:46 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Saturday, 25 February 2017 at 15:21:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 02/25/2017 10:17 AM, rumbu wrote:
A lot of bloat code for something extremely basic.
If you can do it with less code, I'm all
On Sunday, 26 February 2017 at 10:34:07 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Sunday, 26 February 2017 at 09:53:42 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 26 February 2017 at 09:41:46 UTC, rumbu wrote:
[...]
If you want a module with a lot less features, the low-level
core.checkedint might be interesting for
On Sunday, 26 February 2017 at 09:53:42 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 26 February 2017 at 09:41:46 UTC, rumbu wrote:
[...]
If you want a module with a lot less features, the low-level
core.checkedint might be interesting for you:
http://dlang.org/phobos/core_checkedint.html
[...]
It is
On Sunday, 26 February 2017 at 09:41:46 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Saturday, 25 February 2017 at 15:21:10 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 02/25/2017 10:17 AM, rumbu wrote:
A lot of bloat code for something extremely basic.
If you can do it with less code, I'm all ears. Thanks! --
Andrei
This
On Saturday, 25 February 2017 at 15:21:10 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 02/25/2017 10:17 AM, rumbu wrote:
A lot of bloat code for something extremely basic.
If you can do it with less code, I'm all ears. Thanks! -- Andrei
This was not about coding skills, was about usability. The
On 2/25/17 11:00 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Saturday, 25 February 2017 at 15:21:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 02/25/2017 10:17 AM, rumbu wrote:
A lot of bloat code for something extremely basic.
If you can do it with less code, I'm all ears. Thanks! -- Andrei
Perhaps a
On Saturday, 25 February 2017 at 15:21:10 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 02/25/2017 10:17 AM, rumbu wrote:
A lot of bloat code for something extremely basic.
If you can do it with less code, I'm all ears. Thanks! -- Andrei
Perhaps a simpler example for the most basic use case could be
On 02/25/2017 10:17 AM, rumbu wrote:
A lot of bloat code for something extremely basic.
If you can do it with less code, I'm all ears. Thanks! -- Andrei
On Friday, 24 February 2017 at 20:37:28 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 2/24/17 4:20 PM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
checkedint got voted in. With 2 Yes and 2 yes with remarks.
Remarkably unpopular vote we have here.
If I read it right it implies that
nobody cares for checked integers.
A
On Friday, 24 February 2017 at 20:37:28 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 2/24/17 4:20 PM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
checkedint got voted in. With 2 Yes and 2 yes with remarks.
Remarkably unpopular vote we have here.
If I read it right it implies that
nobody cares for checked integers.
It
On Friday, 24 February 2017 at 20:37:28 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
If I read it right it implies that nobody cares for checked
integers.
I guess you can say I don't personally care about them because I
have no personal use case for them. But, as I said in my remarks,
I understand why we
On 2/24/17 4:20 PM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
checkedint got voted in. With 2 Yes and 2 yes with remarks.
Remarkably unpopular vote we have here.
If I read it right it implies that
nobody cares for checked integers.
I will set the autotester to merge.
Thank you @andralex for the hard
checkedint got voted in. With 2 Yes and 2 yes with remarks.
I will set the autotester to merge.
Thank you @andralex for the hard work.
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 12:39:38 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
wrote:
This is the voting thread to decide if the proposed addition to
Phobos, std.experimental.checkedint, should be accepted.
To vote, please respond to this post. You have three options:
* Yes
* Yes with a single condition
*
On Tuesday, 17 January 2017 at 11:53:16 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Same here.
Atila
No interest either. Have zilch problems with integers.
Alright some feedback.
It is rather disappointing that Warn and Abort only write to
stderr. Being able to specify the sink would be great. i may want
to log the issue or something.
There is option to throw on error.
Checked!(Checked!(int, ProperCompare), WithNaN) is rather
inelegent. Why
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:39:38 +, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
> This is the voting thread to decide if the proposed addition to Phobos,
> std.experimental.checkedint, should be accepted.
>
> To vote, please respond to this post. You have three options:
>
> * Yes * Yes with a single condition
On Monday, 16 January 2017 at 19:51:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, January 14, 2017 20:54:11 Jack Stouffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 12:39:38 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek
wrote:
> ...
Overall, the code looks good and the design looks solid.
However,
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 13:25:10 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 12:49:53 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Is the doc available somewhere in a readable form ?
CyberShadow/DAutoTest build the docs, you can find the link at
the end of the PR under checks
Readers
Yes
On Saturday, January 14, 2017 20:54:11 Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 12:39:38 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
>
> wrote:
> > ...
>
> Overall, the code looks good and the design looks solid. However,
> I have no personal use for such a module, so I can't really
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 12:39:38 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
wrote:
...
Overall, the code looks good and the design looks solid. However,
I have no personal use for such a module, so I can't really
comment on it's design with any authority.
Abstain.
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 12:49:53 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Is the doc available somewhere in a readable form ?
CyberShadow/DAutoTest build the docs, you can find the link at
the end of the PR under checks
Is the doc available somewhere in a readable form ?
http://forum.dlang.org/post/wgsguzbgrcejptuxf...@forum.dlang.org
This is the voting thread to decide if the proposed addition to
Phobos, std.experimental.checkedint, should be accepted.
To vote, please respond to this post. You have three options:
* Yes
* Yes with a single condition
* No
If you vote "yes" you can still mention something you'd like
27 matches
Mail list logo
