On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 18:04:52 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 16:24:53 UTC, mogu wrote:
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 15:06:40 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 14:05:22 UTC, mogu wrote:
It's awful that I compile a little 64bit program(or
-m32mscoff)
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 16:24:53 UTC, mogu wrote:
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 15:06:40 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 14:05:22 UTC, mogu wrote:
It's awful that I compile a little 64bit program(or
-m32mscoff) in windows must have visual studio which has
tremendous
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 15:06:40 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 14:05:22 UTC, mogu wrote:
It's awful that I compile a little 64bit program(or
-m32mscoff) in windows must have visual studio which has
tremendous size installed even though I only need a linker.
It's
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 14:45:43 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 14:05:22 UTC, mogu wrote:
Today, I'm working on a private GUI tool which must be run at
linux and windows. It's awful that I compile a little 64bit
program(or -m32mscoff) in windows must have visual
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 15:06:40 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 14:05:22 UTC, mogu wrote:
It's awful that I compile a little 64bit program(or
-m32mscoff) in windows must have visual studio which has
tremendous size installed even though I only need a linker.
It's
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 15:00:07 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
Don't underestimate the value of fast compilation, it's
incredibly useful while writing code.
Sorry for my tone. After waste so much time, I've been a little
mad. :(
In fact, I'm an advocator of meta-programming.
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 14:05:22 UTC, mogu wrote:
It's awful that I compile a little 64bit program(or -m32mscoff)
in windows must have visual studio which has tremendous size
installed even though I only need a linker. It's weird that a
compiler compiles to binary targets needs another
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 14:45:29 UTC, mogu wrote:
Moreover, I wonder if D is really a cross-platform programming
language?! The official dmd only supports x86 structure. You
can never build a project with third party static library in
windows independently.
Back when DMD on windows
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 14:05:22 UTC, mogu wrote:
Today, I'm working on a private GUI tool which must be run at
linux and windows. It's awful that I compile a little 64bit
program(or -m32mscoff) in windows must have visual studio which
has tremendous size installed even though I only need a
Moreover, I wonder if D is really a cross-platform programming
language?! The official dmd only supports x86 structure. You can
never build a project with third party static library in windows
independently. And how I can build an android program? LDC2? So
what dmd is? Only for a bit faster
Today, I'm working on a private GUI tool which must be run at
linux and windows. It's awful that I compile a little 64bit
program(or -m32mscoff) in windows must have visual studio which
has tremendous size installed even though I only need a linker.
It's weird that a compiler compiles to
11 matches
Mail list logo