On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 16:35:39 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
As far as I am aware SWT is only used in Eclipse.
Eclipse can be used to create light-weight RCP apps which include
SWT.
For example, at work we've used swt-xy-graph in some light-weight
apps. There is also a light-weight
Am Mon, 05 Oct 2015 14:21:55 -0400
schrieb Nick Sabalausky :
> > Lots of us use GNOME and are proud to do so.
> >
>
> GNOME3? I'm surprised to hear that. My (perhaps inaccurate)
> understanding was that it landed with quite a thud and alienated a
> lot of
Am Tue, 06 Oct 2015 13:41:48 +
schrieb Jonathan M Davis :
> On Tuesday, 6 October 2015 at 13:38:28 UTC, Gerald wrote:
> > My limited experience with gtkd has been very positive, while
> > the documentation is primarily reference material it's not very
> > difficult to
On 10/06/2015 02:21 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 14:21 -0400, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
GNOME3? I'm surprised to hear that. My (perhaps inaccurate)
understanding was that it landed with quite a thud and alienated a
lot
of its userbase
On 10/06/2015 02:53 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 October 2015 at 18:40:17 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Well that's good to hear. KDE4 went through the same path. After
spending time with KDE4, I found it to be it a terrible blunder of an
upgrade even after, several point releases
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 13:38:04 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 4 October 2015 at 23:24, karabuta via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
For some time now I have been trying various GUIs options in
D. I came to settle on gtkd and dlangui(stability is not my
current priority).
In
On 10/06/2015 11:33 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
As of 2015, critical reception is much more positive.[48] Debian, a
Linux distribution that had historically used GNOME 2, switched to Xfce
when GNOME 3 was released. However, Debian readopted GNOME 3 in time
for the release of Debian 8
On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 21:05 +, bachmeier via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
[…]
> This was one of the more extreme cases though:
>
> - GNOME 3 was very different from GNOME 2. It had no appeal to
> their existing users.
Because they hadn't tried the new way, they just wanted the old way. I
was in
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 18:21:55 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 10/05/2015 12:35 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 18:28 -0400, Nick Sabalausky via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
I absolutely, positively cannot stand software that uses GTK
for GUIs
(including
On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 14:21 -0400, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
[…]
> GNOME3? I'm surprised to hear that. My (perhaps inaccurate)
> understanding was that it landed with quite a thud and alienated a
> lot
> of its userbase (and even many of it's developers), moreso than the
>
On Tuesday, 6 October 2015 at 19:23:40 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 10/06/2015 02:53 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 October 2015 at 18:40:17 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Well that's good to hear. KDE4 went through the same path.
After
spending time with KDE4, I found it to be it a
On Tuesday, 6 October 2015 at 18:40:17 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Well that's good to hear. KDE4 went through the same path.
After spending time with KDE4, I found it to be it a terrible
blunder of an upgrade even after, several point releases in,
people were saying it had finally been fixed.
On Tuesday, 6 October 2015 at 13:38:28 UTC, Gerald wrote:
My limited experience with gtkd has been very positive, while
the documentation is primarily reference material it's not very
difficult to figure out how things work with GTK based on
examples from C or pyGTK. I do use Linix and Gnome
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 13:24:23 UTC, karabuta wrote:
In YHO, what keeps you from using any of those fully(mostly)?
Gtkd first, followed by dlangui. I need to know what I am
signing up for.
I'm working on a search utility using gtkd, it's essentially a
GUI for grep. I was using a
On 10/05/2015 12:35 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 18:28 -0400, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
I absolutely, positively cannot stand software that uses GTK for GUIs
(including Unity and GNOME...not that anybody actually uses GNOME
anymore)
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 18:21:55 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
GNOME3? I'm surprised to hear that. My (perhaps inaccurate)
understanding was that it landed with quite a thud and
alienated a lot of its userbase (and even many of it's
developers), moreso than the early days of KDE4 did. And
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 22:28:59 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
(including Unity and GNOME...not that anybody actually uses
GNOME anymore)
I can't resist but to post this
https://www.archlinux.de/?page=FunStatistics :P
On topic : I don't use gtkd simply because I never do GUI.
Otherwise
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 13:24:23 UTC, karabuta wrote:
For some time now I have been trying various GUIs options in D.
I came to settle on gtkd and dlangui(stability is not my
current priority).
In YHO, what keeps you from using any of those fully(mostly)?
Gtkd first, followed by
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 21:05:11 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
This was one of the more extreme cases though:
- GNOME 3 was very different from GNOME 2. It had no appeal to
their existing users.
- GNOME users were told that GNOME 2 was dead so they had to
"upgrade".
- There was little advance
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 19:48:58 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
As it usually happens, perception can be easily misguided by
the fact that most unhappy users tend to also be most vocal -
while the satisfied ones simply mind their own business. The
link above shows that at least in Arch Linux KDE
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 21:35:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 21:05:11 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
This was one of the more extreme cases though:
- GNOME 3 was very different from GNOME 2. It had no appeal to
their existing users.
- GNOME users were told that GNOME 2 was
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 13:24:23 UTC, karabuta wrote:
For some time now I have been trying various GUIs options in D.
I came to settle on gtkd and dlangui(stability is not my
current priority).
In YHO, what keeps you from using any of those fully(mostly)?
Gtkd first, followed by
GTK is horrid on OSX, and I've had performance issues with it.
I was interested in dlangui, it has promise, but I don't really
want to rely on a library designed by one person that reinvents
everything. It's guaranteed that that one person will want to
move on at some point, and I don't want
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 14:53:57 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 14:16 +, Suliman via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> Qt is the defacto portable standard
+1
I agree that for cross-platform, Qt is increasingly the right
choice again.
This thread is perfect. I am happy to
On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 19:29 +, Zekereth via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 14:48:57 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> > Go only has QML bindings not a complete Qt5 binding. This turns
> > out to be more than enough for good cross-platform
> > applications. I suspect if there
On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 18:28 -0400, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
[…]
> I absolutely, positively cannot stand software that uses GTK for GUIs
> (including Unity and GNOME...not that anybody actually uses GNOME
> anymore) regardless of whether I'm running on Windows or Linux. So I
>
For some time now I have been trying various GUIs options in D. I
came to settle on gtkd and dlangui(stability is not my current
priority).
In YHO, what keeps you from using any of those fully(mostly)?
Gtkd first, followed by dlangui. I need to know what I am
signing up for.
On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 14:16 +, Suliman via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > Qt is the defacto portable standard
> +1
I agree that for cross-platform, Qt is increasingly the right choice
again.
wx was the best choice for a while but it seems to have gone. Qt was
good then lost focus (Nokia's fault)
On 4 October 2015 at 23:24, karabuta via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> For some time now I have been trying various GUIs options in D. I came to
> settle on gtkd and dlangui(stability is not my current priority).
>
> In YHO, what keeps you from using any of those
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 13:24:23 UTC, karabuta wrote:
For some time now I have been trying various GUIs options in D.
I came to settle on gtkd and dlangui(stability is not my
current priority).
In YHO, what keeps you from using any of those fully(mostly)?
Gtkd first, followed by
On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 13:24 +, karabuta via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> For some time now I have been trying various GUIs options in D. I
> came to settle on gtkd and dlangui(stability is not my current
> priority).
>
> In YHO, what keeps you from using any of those fully(mostly)?
> Gtkd first,
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 14:50:10 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
GTK is entirely fine and dandy when using GNOME.
I don't like GNOME either.
I suspect you are trying to use it in OSX or Windows.
Well, I myself am on Linux on the desktop, but yeah, I do
sometimes use my programs on my
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 14:48:11 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Uninformed opinion: isn't there a C binding for Qt?
No, it is a pure C++ lib.
D's C++ interop is getting to the point where it is good enough
to get started with Qt though, but Qt is also a big library with
a lot of other meta
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 15:19:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 14:48:11 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Uninformed opinion: isn't there a C binding for Qt?
No, it is a pure C++ lib.
D's C++ interop is getting to the point where it is good enough
to get started with
Qt is the defacto portable standard
+1
GTK is crap, and dlangui is single-man project, and also look not
very native.
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 14:49:18 UTC, karabuta wrote:
By the way, I can draw icons. Tell me when you need icons for
minigui. At least, I can drawn better than those used in gtk :)
Cool, though I'm trying to use native ones wherever I can both to
get the native look and the keep the size
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 13:24:23 UTC, karabuta wrote:
In YHO, what keeps you from using any of those fully(mostly)?
Gtkd first, followed by dlangui. I need to know what I am
signing up for.
I don't like gtk as an end user, so I don't use it as a developer
either. I've never tried
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 13:41:56 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 13:24:23 UTC, karabuta wrote:
In YHO, what keeps you from using any of those fully(mostly)?
Gtkd first, followed by dlangui. I need to know what I am
signing up for.
I don't like gtk as an end
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 13:38:04 UTC, Manu wrote:
Qt is the defacto portable standard, including mobile devices.
Sadly, there is no substitute, so as far as I'm concerned, D
waits for a Qt5 binding.
Uninformed opinion: isn't there a C binding for Qt? Why can't you
just tie into that?
On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 13:41 +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
[…]
> I don't like gtk as an end user, so I don't use it as a developer
> either. I've never tried dlangui, it came out after I started
> writing my own.
>
> What irks me about gtk as a user is that I have to install
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 14:48:57 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Go only has QML bindings not a complete Qt5 binding. This turns
out to be more than enough for good cross-platform
applications. I suspect if there was a D/QML binding, this
would be a good place to be.
Have you seen this?
On 10/04/2015 09:24 AM, karabuta wrote:
For some time now I have been trying various GUIs options in D. I came
to settle on gtkd and dlangui(stability is not my current priority).
In YHO, what keeps you from using any of those fully(mostly)? Gtkd
first, followed by dlangui. I need to know
On 10/04/2015 10:53 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 14:16 +, Suliman via Digitalmars-d wrote:
GTK is crap, and dlangui is single-man project, and also look not
very native.
GTK is perfect, definitely not crap. If you are using GNOME or one of
the other UI
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 22:28:59 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I absolutely, positively cannot stand software that uses GTK
for GUIs (including Unity and GNOME...not that anybody actually
uses GNOME anymore) regardless of whether I'm running on
Windows or Linux. So I definitely won't write
44 matches
Mail list logo