On Sunday, 7 August 2016 at 21:04:40 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Sunday, 7 August 2016 at 20:08:48 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Sunday, 7 August 2016 at 20:03:45 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
BTW, dlang-bot got a logo and it's own home page today.
[Dlang-Bot](http://dlang-bot.herokuapp.com/)
Also since
On Sunday, 7 August 2016 at 20:08:48 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Sunday, 7 August 2016 at 20:03:45 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
BTW, dlang-bot got a logo and it's own home page today.
[Dlang-Bot](http://dlang-bot.herokuapp.com/)
Also since yesterday it cancels outdated Travis-CI builds to
reduce
On Sunday, 7 August 2016 at 20:03:45 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
BTW, dlang-bot got a logo and it's own home page today.
[Dlang-Bot](http://dlang-bot.herokuapp.com/)
Also since yesterday it cancels outdated Travis-CI builds to
reduce our test load.
On Sunday, 7 August 2016 at 20:03:45 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
That is actually the syntax for github's Bugzilla integration
that we're using, and I don't plan on replacing that. We also
rely on that for our changelog.
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 14:27:22 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Can we please have dlang-bot recognize the GitHub syntax as
well?
That is actually the syntax for github's Bugzilla integration
that we're using, and I don't plan on replacing that. We also
rely on that for our changelog.
As
On 19/05/2016 3:06 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-05-18 17:05, Daniel Murphy wrote:
No, because #99 is a github pull request reference.
GitHub uses the same syntax to refer to issues and pull requests. If the
syntax works for GitHub I don't see why it can't work for us. No point
in
On 2016-05-18 17:05, Daniel Murphy wrote:
No, because #99 is a github pull request reference.
GitHub uses the same syntax to refer to issues and pull requests. If the
syntax works for GitHub I don't see why it can't work for us. No point
in inventing a new syntax when a lot of developers
On 2016-05-18 17:32, David Nadlinger wrote:
dlang-bot is not related to the Bugzilla integration proper. Martin
wrote it to have links back to the respective issues automatically
available somewhere on the PR page, but it's a separate tool.
I suspected that, not sure how is relevant though.
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 at 14:27:22 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Apparently dlang-bot doesn't recognize the GitHub
syntax/conventions [1] to link and close issues from pull
requests. Instead one have to use "Fix issue ...". I don't see
a point in inventing new conventions for this.
Can we
On 19/05/2016 12:27 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Apparently dlang-bot doesn't recognize the GitHub syntax/conventions [1]
to link and close issues from pull requests. Instead one have to use
"Fix issue ...". I don't see a point in inventing new conventions for this.
Can we please have dlang-bot
Apparently dlang-bot doesn't recognize the GitHub syntax/conventions [1]
to link and close issues from pull requests. Instead one have to use
"Fix issue ...". I don't see a point in inventing new conventions for this.
Can we please have dlang-bot recognize the GitHub syntax as well?
[1]
11 matches
Mail list logo
